Skip navigation
Home/Support/

Forums

1 2 Previous Next 8715 Views 55 Replies Latest reply: Apr 8, 2010 4:24 PM by Chris Cox RSS
Kingdex Calculating status... 24 posts since
Jan 12, 2006
Currently Being Moderated

Nov 13, 2008 9:24 AM

Printer Dialog Box in CS4 - Printing Grayscale Images

I hope I'm not duplicating a new topic. I thought I opened this topic yesterday but I don't seem to be able to locate it in this forum. So, I'll try again. This is a pivotal CS4 question re printer set-up for grayscale images with and without b&w profiles.

When setting up print parameters for a Grayscale image in PS CS4 I no longer have the option to select "No Color Management." It seems to be available to RGB images but not grayscale. Which leads to the question as to how I set up print parameters to print grayscale images using Advanced Black & White mode. Can you help?
Regards,
King Dexter
  • Neil_Keller User 4,173 posts since
    Jun 27, 2006
    King,

    Can you give us some details about your Mac, printer (and which desktop printer and/or if you are outputting for litho, etc.) and OS, please?

    Thanks.

    Neil
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    Currently Being Moderated
    2. Nov 13, 2008 10:26 AM (in response to Kingdex)
    Re: Printer Dialog Box in CS4 - Printing Grayscale Images
    King

    I see exactly what you mean. With my two laser printer I can select it, but with both the Epson and Canon inkjets I can not select it with grayscale images.

    Probably just another one of the big printing screwups with PSCS4. How anybody can get a accurate print from PSCS4 through the printer drivers will be interesting to find out.

    This is with 10.5.5. What it does with 10.4.11 I do not know.

    At this point I just print from PS to the Canon with their 16bit, bypassing the whole printing through the driver mess.

    Seems to me Epson needs to get on the ball and create a plugin for printing from PS.

    This whole Adobe, Apple, Printer/driver mess is way beyond ridiculous and I for one am done wasting any more time trying to figure it out.
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    Currently Being Moderated
    3. Nov 13, 2008 10:31 AM (in response to Kingdex)
    Re: Printer Dialog Box in CS4 - Printing Grayscale Images
    >Seems to me Epson needs to get on the ball and create a plugin for printing from PS.

    I guess I need to take that statement back. Epson does have a plugin for some of their printer anyway.

    http://dpnow.com/4910.html
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    Currently Being Moderated
    6. Nov 15, 2008 10:01 AM (in response to Kingdex)
    Re: Printer Dialog Box in CS4 - Printing Grayscale Images
    >What am I missing here?

    PSCS3?
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    Currently Being Moderated
    8. Nov 15, 2008 10:46 AM (in response to Kingdex)
    Re: Printer Dialog Box in CS4 - Printing Grayscale Images
    >Why the changes?

    That is a good question. Why no answers?

    This thread asks the same question.

    http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.59b6e9f5/22
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    >In 10.5 Apple has pulled back support for "No CM"

    Not when using PSCS3 or LR1.4.1. Or, just the "Print Setting" one time in LR2. Or any other app. Only in LR2 and PSCS4 is there no support? With some printer driver? That is the big question.

    >But for most current drivers Printer Manages
    color should provide identical results as No CM; with the appropriate
    driver settings.

    This is my test with the Canon driver.
    DYP, "LR2 Print bug now in PSCS4" #68, 11 Nov 2008 3:00 pm

    >You can either use Let Printer Manage color, or better I think, select Adobe RGB (1998) as the working (printer) space when using Let Photoshop Manage color. Then use ABW.

    Yes you could build a profile on top of that, then assign it in ABW.

    But the problem still arises because Adobe has chosen to control some aspects of the printer drivers. This may work for some printer/driver/OS combinations but not all.
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    Beside what does anything that Apple supposedly did have to do with your original problem? With a grayscale image In PSCS3 you could choose "No Color Management" and in PSCS4 you can't. Both using the exact same driver/OS combo.
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    >To make things more complicated OS X 10.5 has a new print dialog pane called
    Color Matching which allows you to select Colorsync vs driver based mode and ICC profiles. I
    don't know how this will affect things -- I'd leave it alone.

    This where we are getting bit with the Canon drivers. The Color Matching options are grayed out and they are defaulting to Color Colorsync when printing from LR2 and CS4.

    I am not sure what printer you are using but you might want to check if there is a PS plugin for it. The Canon iPF printers have a plugin that bypasses all this Application/OS/Printer Driver silliness.

    You might find this interesting. The Canon just released Digital Photo Professional 3.5.1 has exactly the same problem. This is the first non Adobe product that I know of that has the same issues.
  • MadManChan2000 Adobe Employee 2,707 posts since
    Apr 4, 2008
    I will likely post an article with details later, but the short answer to King's question (how to print untagged gray/RGB images for the use of profiling for the ABW driver with CS4 and Leopard) is the following:

    Take your untagged gray target and choose "Assign Profile" and assign the profile "Gray Gamma 1.8". In PS CS4's Print box, choose "Printer Manages Color" from the Color Handling menu. This makes the Rendering Intent menu active, but that does not matter; ignore it. In the Epson driver, choose your desired driver settings (enable ABW at the least, of course). Print.

    If your untagged target is in RGB mode (like mine is), do exactly the same as above but instead of choosing Gray Gamma 1.8, assign ProPhoto RGB to the image instead. (PP RGB also has a gamma encoding of 1.8.)

    The gamma of 1.8 is essential. If you try using gamma 2.2, Adobe RGB, or sRGB, you will not get the correct result.
  • Calculating status... 29 posts since
    May 28, 2006
    "If your untagged target is in RGB mode (like mine is), do exactly the same as above but instead of choosing Gray Gamma 1.8, assign ProPhoto RGB to the image instead. (PP RGB also has a gamma encoding of 1.8.)"

    If the image is in RGB mode, why wouldn't you just choose "No Color Management" as before? What does the driver see differently between "No Color Management" and "Photoshop Manages Colors"? I'm trying to understand what's going on here and why the changes.
  • MadManChan2000 Adobe Employee 2,707 posts since
    Apr 4, 2008
    Hi Stephen, good question. The issue is that, currently, if you attempt to use "No Color Management" in Photoshop CS4's Print box -- as you describe -- followed by selecting the Advanced B&W Photo mode in the Epson driver, nothing will happen. In other words, the printer simply does not print. Hence the workaround I described in Post #14.

    (Note that this workaround is only needed for the specific configuration of PS CS4 + Epson ABW + Mac OS X Leopard.)
  • User 29 posts since
    May 28, 2006
    Eric, thanks for your reply. Maybe Adobe needs to sort out the weirdness that's been going on between them and Apple over the printer driver interface, rather than doing this in such a cavalier fashion that impinges on day to day use of their product. The more I look at CS4 (I already have seven bug reports in the system, most of which are pretty obvious) the less I think it's ready for prime time.
  • Chris Cox Adobe Employee 10,429 posts since
    May 20, 2006
    Adobe HAS been working with Apple to resolve the driver issues. That's why things (mostly) improved in CS4. There are some problem drivers still out there, and some manufacturers won't update/fix their older drivers.

    What are "ABW" profiles?

    Photoshop Manages Color should be producing correct results with valid profiles and any recent printer driver (if the driver doesn't follow the rules, then Apple nor Adobe can make it do the right thing).
  • Conrad Chavez User 321 posts since
    Jul 26, 2006
    >What are "ABW" profiles?

    Chris, check with Eric Chan about these...he's got one of the most helpful pages on the Web about using Advanced Black and White mode on the Epson 3800, and he is a source of ABW profiles.
    http://people.csail.mit.edu/ericchan/dp/Epson3800/abwprofiles.html
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    >Adobe HAS been working with Apple to resolve the driver issues. That's why things (mostly) improved in CS4. There are some problem drivers still out there, and some manufacturers won't update/fix their older drivers.

    Yes but you did not have to make the choices that you did in trying to control something in the printers drivers. You don't do it in ID or IL.
  • User 29 posts since
    May 28, 2006
    "What are "ABW" profiles?"

    These are profiles invoked with "Photoshop Manages Color" intended to linearize Epson's Advanced Black & White mode. ABW does offer different tone curve settings, but it makes assumptions about the gamma of the incoming data which the ABW profiles correct for. The profiles are created by printing a step-wedge with "No Color Management" and selecting ABW in the driver and the bit fit of tone curve to the paper. The step-wedge is then measured with a spectro and a profile created (with something like QTR-Create-ICC from the QuadToneRIP package). The end result is very linear output with optimal shadow detail, especially when the input data is in a space with L* gamma. Now you know.

    This may be a naive question but what's to stop Adobe from restoring "No Color Management" to the menu, doing a null transform and presenting the data to the driver as though "Photoshop Manages Color" had been selected? I think we all appreciate that Adobe, Apple & Epson have to get their ducks in a row to make this work properly, but there has to be a better approach than the one currently adopted by Adobe.
  • Chris Cox Adobe Employee 10,429 posts since
    May 20, 2006
    Adobe and Apple have things in line.

    But apparently Epson missed some paths in their printer drivers.
  • Michael_Lenox@stream.com Calculating status... 123 posts since
    May 6, 2008
    Here's something that should work too to make use of the Epson ABW printer settings.

    In the Photoshop CS4 print window, just use "Photoshop Manages Color" and click the Print... button.

    When the Mac OS Print dialog window opens, you can then use the Pulldown Menu (where you can change Layout etc.) under the Presets to make adjustments to color management to how the printer will output the print job.
  • MadManChan2000 Adobe Employee 2,707 posts since
    Apr 4, 2008
    That's a good idea. Unfortunately, that still doesn't work correctly under Leopard. (i.e., the results from that effort will not match the results from printing under Tiger, or from printing under Windows with CS4, nor match the results from printing under Leopard with CS3).
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    Until I hear different I don't think there is any Printer/Driver combinations that actually work correctly with CS4 and Leopard.
  • Chris Cox Adobe Employee 10,429 posts since
    May 20, 2006
    DYP - most recent printers DO work correctly with CS4 and Leopard (we spent a lot of time testing them). Older printers that don't have bugs fixed in their drivers (not up to Leopard standards), and a few odd workflows (like Epson's ABW apparently) still have problems.
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    Do you have a list of what you call most recent printers that you tested?
  • Chris Cox Adobe Employee 10,429 posts since
    May 20, 2006
    I personally don't have that list, we've got dozens of them in labs and offices, plus the wide format monsters spilling out into the hallway (darnit, I had to move my bookshelves to make space for the HP Z3100).

    The short answer is: anything from HP, Canon, or Epson made within the past 3 years is probably here and well tested. We've also got a selection of lasers from Xerox and HP. But our full list is pretty bloody long. (then add the printers beta testers tried and it gets a lot longer)
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    Well I can tell you all the latest Canon printers do not work correctly with PSCS4 and Leopard. Color Matching selections in the driver dialog are grayed out and defaults to ColorSync and there is no way to turn it off (CM that is). This of course results in double profiling. With PSCS3 in this exact same environment Color Matching selections in the driver dialog are grayed out and defaults to ColorSync but in the driver No Correction is selected. In that same dialog in the driver when printing from PSCS4 ColorSync is selected. With PSCS4 other selection such as monochrome are grayed out.

    This is all with PS Manages Color.

    I can also tell you that color lasers from Xerox have the same issue with Color Matching selection in the driver dialog being grayed out.

    I will add that this is not that big of an issue with the Canon because of the PS Plugin for printing. It is an issue when printing from LR2.1.
  • Chris Cox Adobe Employee 10,429 posts since
    May 20, 2006
    Which model of Canon printer are you using?

    I didn't see that with the iPF6100 I just printed on (it's in the hall outside my office, so convenient).
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    I am using the iPF9000 Driver version 1.30

    Are you using the 1.40 driver with iPF6100?
  • Calculating status... 8 posts since
    Dec 24, 2006
    I'm having the 'images print too dark" problem using CS4 on a G5 PowerBook with OX 10.4.11. I'm printing with a custom B&W profile in ABW on an Epson 2400. The images are in ProPhoto working space, 16 bit, RGB, but using the B&W adjustment layer to make then into B&W images. They have not been converted to Grayscale mode.

    Printing with exactly the same settings in CS3 and in CS4 using ABW Fine Adj/Dark, the CS4 print is significantly darker.

    This is similar, but not the same as King's problem. I tried Eric Chan's idea of Printer Manages Color, but still get a way too dark image.

    Any other ideas?

    Marj
  • MadManChan2000 Adobe Employee 2,707 posts since
    Apr 4, 2008
    In CS4, try doing

    - Edit -> Convert to Profile. Choose your custom B&W profile. Preview image should look ok.

    - Edit -> Assign Profile. Choose Generic RGB. Preview will look bogus. Ignore it.

    - Do File -> Print. Choose Printer Manages Colors. Rendering Intent doesn't matter.

    - Set ABW driver settings as desired.
  • Ramón G Castañeda Participant 11,312 posts since
    Jul 27, 2006
    Marj,

    Did you follow the advice of making sure the printer you're printing to is the Default printer on your machine?
  • User 8 posts since
    Dec 24, 2006
    Hi Eric,

    This is really exciting.

    I followed your steps in CS4 which one change.
    1) Edit>Convert to Profile and choose my custom B&W profile, that was creating using a black & white step wedge target and ABW
    2) Edit>Assign Profile. I could not choose Generic RGB. My only choices were Generic Gray Profile, Gray Gamma 2.2, Gray Gamma 1.8, etc. No RGB choices. I choose Generic Gray Profile
    3) File>Print using Printer Manages Color
    4) Used my normal ABW print set-up.

    Not only did the print match my monitor, but it actually had a little more contrast and spark than the one I printed with CS3. And, it was no longer the dark disaster I've been fighting with CS4.

    Anyone else want to try this and report back?

    I'm going to reprint a whole bunch of images and will let you know.

    Eric - thank you!

    Note to Ramon - yes the 2400 is my default printer
  • Ramón G Castañeda Participant 11,312 posts since
    Jul 27, 2006
    Marj,

    Thank you for getting back to us. Congratulations on solving your problem.
  • User 8 posts since
    Dec 24, 2006
    Eric's procedure works! I'm using CS4, G5 PowerMac, OS 10.4.11, and Epson 2400 printer. (The only change was after converting to my custom B&W profile to edit>Assign to profile choosing Generic Gray profile.)

    I've tested using my custom B&W Epson SemiGloss profile and my custom Harman Gloss profile. I've printed 5 images - 2 dark ones, 2 light ones, and one with a wide range of tones. They look great. No more dark disaster with CS4 printing.

    Eric - could you explain why this worked? I'm really curious.
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    I believe that by choosing "Printer Manages Color" there is no forcing of the printer driver to do anything, so that nothing else is happening but what you choose in the printer driver settings.

    PS Manages Color setting forces settings in the driver (some you probably can't even see which leads to the double profiling). Some drivers work correctly and turn of CM and some don't.
  • User 8 posts since
    Dec 24, 2006
    DYP- Unfortunately just choosing Printer Manages Color in CS4 and then making selections in the Epson ABW driver produced extremely dark images on my Epson 2400. CS3 produced images that matched my monitor.

    Now that I'm following Eric Chan's work around (see Eric's and my postings of Dec 17th), the images come out great in CS4.
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    I should have mentioned converting to printer/paper profile in PS. I just assumed you would assume that is what I meant.
  • User 8 posts since
    Dec 24, 2006
    Eric & King -
    King said: "Eric's workaround is solid and works in nearly every ABW situation I've recently encountered. Although I understand exactly how and why it works it's really up to Eric to explain what is really happening "under the hood" with his workaround."

    I believe that converting the image to my custom B&W paper/ink profile before going into the print window allows for bypassing the CS4 print window profile setting. Since the CS4 print window software has been changed from CS3, the 'too dark prints' problem is thus avoided.

    But what does the assign to profile Generic Gray Profile do?
  • MadManChan2000 Adobe Employee 2,707 posts since
    Apr 4, 2008
    Glad to hear it works! And yes, choosing Generic Gray in your case is the right thing to do for that image, since you were in Grayscale mode (not RGB mode).

    In brief, what's going on is that CS4 moved to a new set of printing APIs provided by Apple (Core Graphics / Quartz). This is a requirement moving forward (e.g., I'm sure you want 64-bit support for Mac Photoshop at some point, right?). However, there is currently a glitch with the result that once you print the image from CS4, Leopard will convert the image data to Generic Gray or Generic RGB (if you're in Grayscale or RGB mode, respectively) before handing it off to the driver. This conversion messes things up because it happens __after__ the conversion using your B&W profile of choice (i.e., what you select from PS's Printer Profile popup menu in the Print box).

    The good news is that the glitch is being tackled by Adobe and Epson working together.

    In the meantime, if you use the workaround I described, then by doing the conversion "yourself" (step 1) and then assigning Generic Gray or Generic RGB (step 2), this causes Leopard's conversion to do nothing. In other words, Leopard sees the image coming from Photoshop and says, "cool, it's already generic gray/RGB, so I don't have to do anything" and then just passes it off to the driver unmodified.

    Yes, it's a little messy and unfortunate that this happened. But the good news is that ultimately it'll get worked out and in the meantime there's a pretty easy workaround (as long as you don't freak out after performing step 2 when you see how bad the image looks).
  • User 8 posts since
    Dec 24, 2006
    Eric - I'm having the same problem with Mac OS 10.4.11 Tiger on a G5 PowerMac. So the problem is not just with Leopard.

    Your workaround procedure produces great images -- finally!!!

    Will the software update Adobe & Epson are working on also fix the problem in Tiger, not just Leopard?
  • Was DYP User 1,177 posts since
    Jul 28, 2008
    Eric

    Now I see why Canon introduced Fast Graphic Process in it driver, to prevent Leopard from doing this. Funny thing is they must have already known this or did it because of Indesign. I noticed before (the drivers they just released which fixed the no CM in the driver problem) if I converted to the printer profile in PS I could not get a correct print unless I enabled Fast Graphic Process in the driver. This was with Printer Color Management set in PS.
  • MadManChan2000 Adobe Employee 2,707 posts since
    Apr 4, 2008
    Interesting point, Doyle. I am not familiar with the internal workings of the Canon printer driver but based on your description I agree that the FGP is likely aimed at avoiding this conversion.

    Marj, it is likely that the issue will also be addressed under Tiger (but I cannot say for sure since I am not personally writing the fix).
  • The_Head User 20 posts since
    May 19, 2009

    There are some interesting things being discussed here, and several of them apply to my situation.  I apologize for hijacking the thread, but it looks to be dead anyway, and at least this will force it back to the top of the list.

     

    So I had firsthand experience with the "photoshop prints nothing" problem last week while trying to print untagged and unmanaged RBG files for profiling.  I read several of the work arounds for that problem, but just wasn't convinced that some type of CM wasn't being applied and therefore defeating the purpose of the targets.  In the end, I was able to use someone's laptop with CS3 to print the targets, everything went well, profiles created, problem solved!  Or so I thought...  Now that I have the profiles created and am trying to print some 16-bit images, we have a big problem- they look terrible!  The color is over-saturated, and the prints are way too dark.  Take the exact same file(s), don't check the 16-bit box and they look great.  I have made sure to enable 16-bit in the photoshop print module as well as the epson driver, I've also tried it enabled in one and not the other.  It feels like I have tried every combination of available options, but I really hope I'm missing something... I'm on a MacPro running 10.5.7 and CS4, I've tried both ProPhoto images as well as Adobe1998.  I have the Leopard print driver, and to the best of my knowledge everything else is up to date.

     

    Any suggestions?

     

    Thanks!

1 2 Previous Next

Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)