Skip navigation
Currently Being Moderated

Does anyone think this forum is an improvement?

Apr 6, 2009 11:54 AM

The previous webforum/NNTP interface had roughly 90 percent of the questions coming from the webforum, and 90 percent of the mostly correct replies coming from the NNTP newgroup users.

 

The newsgroup users are for the most part NOT going to use this web forum.

 

so for the most part- there are 50 or 100 people who tried to offer help daily, who are not "in here" and won't participate because this web forum interface is just slow and clunky and flashy. We just want TEXT. NNTP. WORDS.

 

I've been ACE and TMM longer than i can remember. Not renewing.

 
Replies 1 2 3 Previous Next
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 6, 2009 12:00 PM   in reply to the real blu

    Slow? Hell yes. Overly complicated? Ditto. Usual Adobe eye candy and gloss to replace slick and functional? Check.

     

    This is the worst "upgrade" since the last four upgrades to Illustrator. If you have sex with Adobe you'll have to be on top. They can only screw up.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 6, 2009 12:02 PM   in reply to the real blu

    Yea...but we all get to see David's picture...so its not a total loss...

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 6, 2009 12:04 PM   in reply to typomann

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 6, 2009 12:11 PM   in reply to David_Powers

    No. without the "Pros" helping us, what good is it?

     

    I think that the bigwigs in charge of Adobe were worried about job security so they needed to screw with what works, so that they'd have something to fix for the next 10 years - you know, create some job security...

     

    And the fonts in the window is too big and takes up too much room.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 6, 2009 12:28 PM   in reply to the real blu

    OK. I tried it.  I had to do that in the interest of fairness but people running businesses don't have time for this.

    Rule 1. know your customers and how they work.

    What Adobe are saying is that they don't care.  Interesting course of action in a competitive market.  Of course community forums have no impact on product choice, brand awareness and brand trust.  So that's OK.

     

    Jan

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 6, 2009 1:12 PM   in reply to David_Powers

    David: I'm concerned.  Your head seems to have lost its native aspect ratio.  Is there something we need to know?  Were you recently run over by a beer truck?

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 6, 2009 3:27 PM   in reply to MurraySummers

    Murray *ACE* wrote:

     

    Were you recently run over by a beer truck?

    No, but I might have drunk too much wine. I'm now yin and yang until my 128 x128 mug shot is approved.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 6, 2009 4:23 PM   in reply to David_Powers

    Plus, now I'm getting messages from this bloody forum in my email... What a huge waste of code this forum....

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 6, 2009 4:27 PM   in reply to the real blu

    I like the new forum, the features it provides over the previous application are great. I'm also happy the quirks the NNTP replies brought to the forum side are gone.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 6, 2009 4:28 PM   in reply to Paevo Kelley

    Just go to "Your Stuff" and "Preferences" and you can turn that off Paevo.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 6, 2009 4:32 PM   in reply to Paevo Kelley

    I was annoyed with that at first, but now instead of looking the board over, I just get notified to an addition to a post I am watching. I just set up a folder for DW Discussion and let them go there and I can go back at my leasure...

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 6, 2009 4:34 PM   in reply to JoeyD1978

    Thanks, Joey; Cheers...

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 5:36 AM   in reply to the real blu

    I agree; just waiting for the wysiwyg editor to open seems to take forever. As If I needed to specify which font to use to ask a question... This forum is much less useful as a learning tool than it was before. How long do you think it will be before people start inserting pornographic videos and bring the whole thing crashing down?

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 7:59 AM   in reply to the real blu

    Ridiculous decision to wipe out Newsgroup.Access.

    A key reason for choosing DW as a development tool is the near-instantaneous support available through the newsgroup

    It is most disheartening to watch a company make decisions like this.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 1:35 PM   in reply to Paevo Kelley

    "I agree; just waiting for the wysiwyg editor to open seems to take forever. As If I needed to specify which font to use to ask a question... This forum is much less useful as a learning tool than it was before. How long do you think it will be before people start inserting pornographic videos and bring the whole thing crashing down?" QUOTE INSERTED FOR BENEFIT OF JOEY1978

     

    All good points.  I wondered about the usefullness of file uploads, too.  Is this really necessary?  Personally, I won't open any file attachments unless I know they're from a trusted source.

     

     

    favicon.ico

    Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    Web | Graphics | Print | Media  Specialists
    www.alt-web.com/

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 1:41 PM   in reply to the real blu

    Not at all, very cumbersome and slow.

    Bewildered.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 1:45 PM   in reply to Nancy O.

    Looks like the nntp sever went down about 1 min. ago

    "Nancy O" <nancyoshea1@NOSPAMatt.net> wrote in message
    news:grg25v$i2o$1@forums.macromedia.com...
    > Sorry.  Make that April 7th not 6th, Doh.

     

    > "Nancy O" <nancyoshea1@NOSPAMatt.net> wrote in message
    > news:grg25v$i2o$1@forums.macromedia.com...
    > > Sorry.  Make that April 7th not 6th, Doh.
    >
    > I'm here!
    >

    Thierry did get the last post.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 2:16 PM   in reply to bewidered

    It appears to me that bewildered is bewidered.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 2:35 PM   in reply to MurraySummers

    Bewilderment, in itself, is not so bad

    Plastics....


    That is the future

     

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 3:50 PM   in reply to the real blu

    I am still scratching my head over some of these changes. This new forum setup seems inefficient and difficult to keep track of. My preference was the original Adobe Forum setup. It was pretty close to what I would call the perfect forum setup. Professional, user friendly, and well thought out in so many ways. I can't for the life of me understand why Adobe would change to a setup like this for professionals. On the plus side, I will be keeping track of much fewer threads this way, so I won't waste as much time using the forums.

     

    I also understand that Adobe removed the ability to use news readers. Whereas I don't use a news reader, I know that it is supposed to be a very efficient way for those who help others, such as Murray. Because I want to support our faithful Support base, I am in favor of requesting that Adobe give this feature back to it's support base.

     

    I keep trying to guess why change something that worked so well for so long was replaced. It wasn't broken; why did it need to be fixed? Now it's broken. Now it feels more like teenie bopper town than professional Adobe interaction. I guess the word is: Juvenile?

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 3:52 PM   in reply to the real blu

    One more thing…

     

    I get the feeling that Adobe needs to clean house. The captain of this ship doesn't seem to have a proper compass.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 5:08 PM   in reply to the real blu

    I'm searching but not finding... is there a way to bookmark a thread? Like the old threads, so I can easily come back to the thread I want to follow up on?

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 5:10 PM   in reply to LRK 2

    LRK, Such nautical terms. I guess that's a lot better than using other sailor language these forums deserve.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 5:15 PM   in reply to Saskatchewanobie

    Saskatchewanobie wrote:

     

    I'm searching but not finding... is there a way to bookmark a thread? Like the old threads, so I can easily come back to the thread I want to follow up on?

     

    I don't think you can currently. This would be an important addition and we should request it.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 7, 2009 6:17 PM   in reply to the real blu

    LRK, Such nautical terms.

    Sorry about that. I love nautical terms because they represent life in so many cool ways.

     

    On another note, I would like to at least make one suggestion. It would be helpful if we could set our preferences to reverse the order of each thread, to where the last post is at the top, and so forth. This would at least prevent the continuous need to find the last page to see what has been posted.

     

    As for bookmarking, at this point I guess the best we can do is use our browsers to bookmark. Not very high tech I admit but it looks like high tech has turned on it's heals and we are headed the other direction.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 8, 2009 1:25 AM   in reply to LRK 2

    It would be helpful if we could set our preferences to reverse the order of each thread, to where the last post is at the top, and so forth.

    I think that might be rather confusing. However, there is already a very convenient way to get to the most recent post. Just click XX (minutes|hours) ago above the person's name in the Last Post column of the main discussion list. That takes you directly to the last post.

     

    If you're already inside a thread, there's a "last post" link at the top of the page.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 8, 2009 2:33 AM   in reply to the real blu

    The old nntp/webforum setup did 300+ messages a day.

    In the three months prior to the switchover, this forum and the Dreamweaver Application Development forum did a combined average of 270 messages a day.

    This is not doing that. Can't see any overall stats because every link i click opens something else...

    A very crude way of estimating is to count the number of posts and replies. The first page of 30 posts contains approximately 130 replies. To get to posts that are more than one day old, you need to go back to the fourth page. Yesterday, this forum was just as busy, if not busier, than it used to be. To get an accurate count, just subscribe to the forum by email. I unsubscribed because I couldn't cope with the flood of messages.

     

    Yes, I would like to see NNTP restored, but the only way to persuade Adobe to do so is by using well thought-out arguments.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 8, 2009 9:14 AM   in reply to David_Powers

    A very crude way of estimating is to count the number of posts and replies. The first page of 30 posts contains approximately 130 replies.

     

    The value of this forum should not be measured by the number of posts and replies, rather by the number of issues that it solves.  The "crude" measure that you are suggesting is more likely to measure the amount of noise that this forum produces than its effectiveness in helping people better understand Adobe products and how to use them to their advantage.

     

    If we are looking for a good indicator of this forum's success, then we should be looking at the number of solved issues as functions of the following:

     

    1)  The total number of posts.

    2)  The total number of responses.

    3)  The average number of visits to unresolved problems.

    4)  etc.

     

    The argument that Newsgroup Users cannot see whether a problem has been resolved or not should no longer be an issue, as everyone is working in the same medium. 

    . . . the only way to persuade Adobe to do so is by using well thought-out arguments.

     

    Adobe is likely no better positioned to cut through the noise than any of its contributers.  Well-reasoned arguments are easily lost amidst mayhem.

     

    Roddy

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 8, 2009 9:24 AM   in reply to kiusau

    If we are looking for a good indicator of this forum's success, then we should be looking at the number of solved issues as functions of the following:

    1)  The total number of posts.
    2)  The total number of responses.
    3)  The average number of visits to unresolved problems.
    4)  etc.

     

    Are those mutually exclusive? If so, I choose #4.

     

    The argument that Newsgroup Users cannot see whether a problem has been resolved or not should no longer be an issue, as everyone is working in the same medium.

     

    What gives you that idea?

     

    --
    Mark A. Boyd
    Keep-On-Learnin'

     

    Message was edited by: Mark A. Boyd (added my sig)

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 8, 2009 9:35 AM   in reply to kiusau

    kiusau wrote:


    The argument that Newsgroup Users cannot see whether a problem has been resolved or not should no longer be an issue, as everyone is working in the same medium. 

     

    Completely wrong. Although NNTP access has been removed, it's perfectly possible to do everything through email or an RSS feed. I'm monitoring several forums through email, which displays no icons, avatars, or images.

     

    The question of whether an issue has been "resolved" is also moot. An inexperienced person is quite likely to mark a question as "answered", even if the answer is wrong, incomplete, or no longer represents best practice. Moreover, once a question has been marked as "answered", the setting cannot be changed. Things are not quite so clear cut as you seem to think.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 8, 2009 9:37 AM   in reply to Mark A. Boyd

    Are those mutually exclusive?

    What would give you reason to believe that they are mutually exclusive?

     

    What gives you that idea?

     

    There are only two ways to respond to questions of which I am aware.

     

    1)  Go online, enter the forum, and observe the results.

    2)  Respond to questions through email.

     

    Certainly with regard to the first you cannot help but observe, whether a questions has been checked as resolved.  Do you not receive some indication of the same through email?

     

    Roddy

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 8, 2009 9:52 AM   in reply to David_Powers

    Completely wrong. Although NNTP access has been removed, it's perfectly possible to do everything through email or an RSS feed. I'm monitoring several forums through email, which displays no icons, avatars, or images.

     

    One does not require an icon, avatar, or image to receive an indication that a topic has been resolved.  The same information could be passed through text.  Is it not?  :smile

     

    In any case this diverges from the question of measuring this forum's success.

     

    The question of whether an issue has been "resolved" is also moot. An inexperienced person is quite likely to mark a question as "answered", even if the answer is wrong, incomplete, or no longer represents best practice.

     

    The last time I posted in this regard it was in response to how one might measure success in this forum.  Within this context I would much prefer a measure of consumer satisfaction over the "crude" measure of noise that you have suggested.

     

    Moreover, once a question has been marked as "answered", the setting cannot be changed.

     

    Obviously a weakness in the system, but still a better indicator of success than your proposed measure of noise.

     

    Things are not quite so clear cut as you seem to think.

     

    If you ever knew how I thought, then communication between us would not be so difficult.  Once again, your thoughts with regard to the vertical centering of text in a floated <span> tag would be greatly appreciated.  Just do not provide them here, as this is not where I posed the original question.

     

    Roddy

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 8, 2009 9:54 AM   in reply to the real blu

    I think it is a massive step backwards

    the nntp forums worked well

    this is just clunky, slow and a hinderance

    wake up adobe and smell the coffee

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 8, 2009 10:18 AM   in reply to kiusau

    I am not aware of a "resolved" email notification, but maybe I haven't

    participated in such a thread yet.

     

    Is it your experience that threads marked as answered are accurate and

    reliable?

     

     

    --

    Mark A. Boyd

    Keep-on-learnin'

    via iPhone

     

    Message was edited by: Mark A. Boyd. Interesting. I was able to change my "on" to "in" in my emailed post from the Web interface.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 8, 2009 10:14 AM   in reply to kiusau

    2)  Respond to questions through email.

     

    Curious. My earlier email reply took almost 20 minutes to appear here. I didn't have this problem in a different thread.


    If email cannot be relied upon, I'm afraid this forum is even less useful than I had initially hoped. I'm not an RSS kind of guy, so I can't speak to that aspect.


    As for "Resolved" or "Answered", I don't think they carry much weight at all. I am under the impression that the vast majority of Web forum newbies don't bother to look at previous threads at all. "Answered" is completely useless for that majority. I know there are exceptions, but I suspect that those who actually do look for past posts are smart enough to distinguish the quality of the answers for themselves.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 8, 2009 10:38 AM   in reply to Mark A. Boyd

    Is it your experience that threads marked as answered are accurate and reliable?

     

    As there is no one to monitor the quality of posts anyway, does it matter?

     

    Important is that the Asker walks away satisfied.  If his satisfaction should prove illusionary, then he can always come back with a new question or reopen his old one.  In fact, reopening an old question should automatically require removal of the user's previous satisfaction setting.

     

    Also, important is that the so-called ACEs of this forum encourage users to make use of the setting.

     

    Roddy

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 8, 2009 10:40 AM   in reply to Mark A. Boyd

    As for "Resolved" or "Answered", I don't think they carry much weight at all. I am under the impression that the vast majority of Web forum newbies don't bother to look at previous threads at all. "Answered" is completely useless for that majority. I know there are exceptions, but I suspect that those who actually do look for past posts are smart enough to distinguish the quality of the answers for themselves.

     

    This statement appears based on the forum's past technology -- not on its current format.

     

    Roddy

     
    |
    Mark as:
1 2 3 Previous Next
Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Answers + Points = Status

  • 10 points awarded for Correct Answers
  • 5 points awarded for Helpful Answers
  • 10,000+ points
  • 1,001-10,000 points
  • 501-1,000 points
  • 5-500 points