I have a 14 page document with page spreads in InDesign CS4. Each page is 8.5"x 11". The first page (the cover) shows up by itself rather than with the last page adjacent to it (this is how those two pages will print on the press). In prepping the document for production, I need to confirm if the pages need to be layed out in that manner (1/14, 2/13, 3/12, 4/11, 5/10, 6/9, 7/8) or if InDesign will render that at the printer's via its current linear layout (spreads currently show 1, 2/3, 4/5, 6/7, 8/9, 10/11, 12/13, 14).
Can anyone confirm this?
Ask your printer.
Usually, you don't have to worry about the physical layout your document will be printed, because various printers have various sizes of paper, and one can print more pages per sheet than another. That has its repercussions on post-press, such as folding and binding, and the client is usually (mercifully) spared that amount of technical detail.
By the way, you are describing a self-cover, 2-up saddle stitch document. You can print a reliable sample from within InDesign using the Print Booklet option, but the page to the left of pg. 1 will be blank -- ID doesn't "believe" in covers, it seems.
Thanks for the response. To clarify, the printer's sheet size is not in question. The concern is in the front/back orientation of facing pages. For example, when trimmed, one 11x17 will feature physical pages 12 and 3 while its reverse side will have pages 4 and 11.
Doing the prepress orientation on my end will save time and money for our production costs. InDesign, however, shows spreads as "2/3" and "4/5" meaning the spreads are layed out in the program in opposition to how they are produced on the press.
Should I ignore the InDesign page numbering and set the spreads up as I know they will produce on the press, ...or better yet, change the document page size to 11x17 and turn off spreads completely? What's the status quo here?
There are scripts for imposing, and there is Print Booklet in the file menu if you want to impose the file yourself, but if you are going to do that, keep in mind that paper has two sides, so each 11 x 17 sheet holds 4 pages, wheter they are blank or have content. You'll need to add two blank pages to get things to impose correctly.
Peter
For a 14 page layout, the spread orientation should be as folows, on the first spread, page 4, 13, 14, 1. The second spread should be page 2, Blank page, Blank page, 3. The next spreads are pages 12 & 5, 10 & 7, 6 & 11, 8 & 9. I think the printer should set this up for you because they may be running a 16 page signature.
![]()
I would never supply a book with printers pairs, i.e, 8/1, 2/7, 6/3, 4/5, that's just asking for trouble.
Supply the file as you would read it, in readers pairs, with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Crop marks on each page and bleed where necessary.
It's up to the printer to paginate the file so that they print the right order for folding, trimming and finishing.
You are describing perfect bound sheets there. I started my graphic industry career with macro-composition (some 20 yrs ago), and for saddle stitch you can leave any of the pages blank, same (mirrored) position on both sides of the printed sheet [*]. The binder cuts up the sheet in two-page-each pieces (4 pages of text) and collects them in the right order; the blank pages are simply thrown out.
Last time I made a mock-up for a saddle stitch document, I simply moved the last page to the start of the document, changed the page numbers within ID, and used Print Booklet. Send to printer, cut, collect, fold, staple, done.
[*] Edit: no, I had to repeat two pages the same on front and back. These then came out after cutting as double the amount needed, and the binder threw half of 'em away. Yeah it's been a while.
For starters you don't say how it's getting printed, digital or offset?
Secondly you will have to talk to your printer and find out exactly how they want it, particularly if it's offset. The order of the pages is actually quite a minor point, there are a host of other things that will have to be done to get it ready for printing, usually a printer would do the pagination at the same time. If you are committed to doing the imposition yourself, and the printer can confirm with you that you are actually saving money (get a quote with the difference, it may just be a sales person suggesting something impractical?) ask for a rough sketch of the layout, a competent prepress person will be able to do it in less than a minute for a 16 pager, (remember 14 pages is impossible
).
Thanks for all the feedback and suggestions, folks. My main problem on this job was not having enough spreads (as one user indicated). I've added the two additional pages necessary to satisfy that part of production (now a total of 16 pages).
All I'm trying to avoid here is providing a document file to the printer and they print the facing pages in the wrong order. I can't see how InDesign allows the designer to layout pages so it would be easily understood by a vendor which 11x17 faces which.
Yes, I intend to provide a mockup showing correct orientation (always a wise move), but I would also like to avoid service charges associated with their staff having to rearrange the pages for production.
I figure what I'll do is make four InDesign files--one for each 11x17. Each file will have two pasteboards. Each pasteboard will have an 11x17 page area with 0.125" full bleed. Each file will be saved with the file name indicating it's placement in the finished product's order.
Would be nice if InDesign was more intuitive toward this end.
It's not really my job to be the harsh guy in these situations, but:
I would also like to avoid service charges associated with their staff having to rearrange the pages for production.
If you pay those service charges, you're paying for their imposition expertise, which you do not yet have. Good on you for trying to acquire it, though.
Would be nice if InDesign was more intuitive toward this end.
Actually, ID isn't a tool towards that end - try something like Quite Imposing if you want to do your own imposition on a regular basis.
strategicdave wrote:
I would also like to avoid service charges associated with their staff having to rearrange the pages for production.
That's what the prepress department at the printer does. You're more likely to incur extra charges if you try to second guess them and provide files they have to straighten out, or which might be useless altogether. The correct way to send any multi-page job to a competent printer is as individual pages. They have software that automates the impositon for their equipment and the size of the document.
I figure what I'll do is make four InDesign files--one for each 11x17. Each file will have two pasteboards. Each pasteboard will have an 11x17 page area with 0.125" full bleed. Each file will be saved with the file name indicating it's placement in the finished product's order.
While this probably won't cost you extra, as long as you don't put together more than two pages into any file, and you don't need or expect any "creep" to compensate for paper buildup in the binding, it's completely unnecessary and a big wast of your time. There's a reason ID is set up to show you pages the same way the reader will see them -- that's how you should be visualizing your design. How they get arranged on the press or printer is completely secondary, as everyone has tried to tell you, and usually not your concern at all.
Peter
From my personal experience (I work in prepress for a commercial printer), I would prefer a PDF in single pages (no spreads) and, if there are any bleeds, crop marks.
As others have said, you'll be making more work and possibly incurring more charges if you try to do the imposition yourself.
Again, thanks for all the feedback on this. No offense, but I think several of you are naive when it comes to trusting your printer. I've been working with printers for 14 years and in my experience (yes, mine), it's a game of C-Y-A. If you're not familiar with that acronym, you've either never realized you got burned, or it hasn't happened yet.
In my collegiate education from LSU's College of Design (many moons ago), we were encouraged to take every step possible to avoid confusion on the vendor side, even if that meant doing their job for them. After all, in the end, the only person you can trust to do the job right is yourself. And I'm not letting anyone burn me (again... yes, I have the guts to admit it has happened).
There is a sect of print designers who definitely feel "that's not my job" or "that's not my problem," but when it comes to delivering the goods and collecting the check... that's definitely when it is your problem. At that point, a designer sure as anything wishes they'd done some C-Y-A.
That's where my question originated. It's the defensive driver instinct engrained in the skill I've chosen as my profession. I want to be sure as <choice explicitive> that I've got my bases covered. No surprises. No blame game. I would encourage all print designers to be so careful.
As for my inquiry, I'll consult the vendor for their preference... but make no mistake, a poorly prepared file provided for production definitely does incur some level of charge. Maybe not today, but maybe in the next job, or in your job not getting priority when you desperately need it done.
In regards to it 'not being your job,' if a file is submitted with incorrect imposition it is far more work to break up spreads and re-impose than it is to impose a single page file in the first place.
I understand you feeling the need to CYA but if you are doing this regularly it's time to either question your workflow or find a new printer - or both.
I agree with Tony, find a new printer! I'm not naive about this, I am a printer, and I don't expect my clients to trust me blindly, I supply proofs so both of us are covered. There is no way that imposition is anything other than the printers job. How can it be when there is such a huge and vast range of ways that they need their files because of different combinations of pre press, printing and finishing machinery?
Industry standard these days is either a packaged Indesign file (preferably with a reference PDF included) or a properly prepared PDF, in single pages in numerical order. And if you're getting a print job without proofs or a very good relationship with your printer you are going to get burned. A proof is the only way to CYA.
I can respect that. Doesn't change the fact that the very real issue here is that your job is on the line every time something goes to press. If the permenance of printwork doesn't scare you, nothing will. Once it's done, there's no going back. Unless you want to cover a multi-thousand dollar job expense to make it right for the client.I, for one, am not going there.
Printers make their most money when they've got the minimum wage pressman (-kid) on the line at three in the morning checking color with a stained and faded Pantone swatchbook from ten years ago. And whoever did your prepress flunked out of an associates degree program, barely got the position he has, and was rushing out on Friday afternoon to a kegger just before he sent your stuff to the plate machine. You really want to trust your pride and joy work to that shambles, go right ahead. To think that's not happening is like trusting the rhythm method to avoid getting a chick pregnant
When you send a file to a printers the cost of the impostion is already taken into account. They expect to get pages in 1, 2,3,4,5,6,7,8 etc. order.
The reason, as stated before, is that different printers use different printing machines, some are larger than the other and take larger sheets for printing, so the imposition increases for larger sheets. As well as that, they already have imposition templates setup specific for their printing machines.
If you supply a file in printers pairs, 8/1, 2/7 etc. it's very difficult for a printer to adjust this for their particular printing press, they may then add additional cost to prepress for seperating the pages so they can imposition (which you're paying for already).
Best piece of advice, before starting the project always talk to your printer about what way they want the file supplied. What file format, what size paper to use, what type of stock, talk to them about margins and creep and things like that.
There are multi-million dollar jobs, or jobs worth thousands of pounds, but that's why you have proof readers, that's why you get the client to sign-off on the printed job. That's why you can ask the printers to be there for the first sheet off the press to examine colour, quality, etc. That's why you can ask your printing company for a mock-up of a print job, on the actual paper. Let's face it, if it's an expensive print run adding another 100 or 200 quid or so for a full mock up won't do any harm to the cost.
Always get a proof from the printers after it's gone through their system. Printers use RIPs, which can affect somethings in final files you send them. So it's important to check what's going to be printed from the printers and get the client to check them too.
You eliminate errors by having safeguards in place and making sure that the client signs off on the job. If the client is happy and then spots and error when it's printed then that is not your fault. (Unless it was a change that the client asked you to do and you didn't)
If you've been burned and feel the need to CYA, then the problem is partly on YOUR end. Every job should get a proof from the printer (and the ones I"ve worked for and with insist on making one and having the client sign off in order to CTA). It is your responsibility to check that proof and tell the printer if there are errors. Then nobody pays for an expensive reprint. If the finishe project doesn't match the signed proof, that's the printer's fault and he alone is responsible for the cost of corrections.
but make no mistake, a poorly prepared file provided for production definitely does incur some level of charge. Maybe not today, but maybe in the next job, or in your job not getting priority when you desperately need it done.
There's a big difference between a "poorly prepared" file -- I saw hundreds of them when I did prepress -- and an "over prepared" file, and make no mistake, if you do things that slow down the prepress tech you will surely pay for it on every successive quote.
strategicdave wrote:
Printers make their most money when they've got the minimum wage pressman (-kid) on the line at three in the morning checking color with a stained and faded Pantone swatchbook from ten years ago. And whoever did your prepress flunked out of an associates degree program, barely got the position he has, and was rushing out on Friday afternoon to a kegger just before he sent your stuff to the plate machine. You really want to trust your pride and joy work to that shambles, go right ahead. To think that's not happening is like trusting the rhythm method to avoid getting a chick pregnant
Smart (and profitable) printers hire experienced and reliable press operators because they know they won't be eating a lot of reprint jobs because somebody on their staff screwed up, and because they get things done correctly and efficiently, and as we all know, time is money and printing is a competitive business. The same is true for prepress. If the business is large enough, they might hire a person with less experience as a trainee, but they'd never set them loose without supervision.
I think you need to find another printer who takes some pride in his work. If you look good, he looks good, and that's good for business.
There is a sect of print designers who definitely feel "that's not my job" or "that's not my problem,"
There are some times when it's really *not* your job. You can't control everything the printer does. Relax...and check the proofs, really, really carefully. That part really is your job.
Ken
strategicdave, If you are that adamant to protect your reputation, you would be better off going to the 3:00 am press approval to inspect and insure quality from the minimum wage pressman and thoroughly examine the contract proof for errors that was provided by the pre-press flunky. Rather than pompously attempt your own printer imposition...
As I said earlier, if you do your own imposition and send it to the printers, they'll likely disassemble it and reassemble to their liking, and it will cost you more in the end.
No need to do the imposition, when you asked for a quote this was already included in the price. Save yourself the hassle, let the pros do it how they need it done, not the way you think it should be done.
Strategic Dave
I work in a prepress environment and this is a very important issue. Assuming you are sending files to a service provider, and you are not printing and cutting and folding yourself, this is what I recommend:
1. InDesign document size should match page size of book
2. Pages should be in reader sequence
3. Your finished stitched imposition proof provided by the printer should be in reader sequence. Flipping through that should follow same order as document. No confusion that way.
4. Avoid making INDD document size the spread size. Make it the page size with facing pages enabled. Then it will look like the finished product. Don't oversize the pages or add marks, it's not necessary.
Do you have folio page numbers actually printing? If so it is best if these numbers match the document page numbers. That is also an important issue. There is always a lot of confusion when someone mentions page 3, and it's page 5 of the document.
This discussion is good and a very important one to prepress folks everywhere. I have made many incorrect proofs, thinking the file is in reader's spreads when in fact it was in printer spreads. Stupid me, but it happens.
Years ago spreads had to be broken up into printer spreads in the native document layout program. So many designers think they are being helpful when they set a file up in printer spreads. But these days the pages get RIPped and trapped individually, and the pages get imposed in a separate program that automates pagination, and also makes adjustments for creep.
I am glad you brought this up it's a very important discussion.
Glad you asked. I usually change the section start at the beginning of the document, just add a prefix C. So first 2 pages, Outside front and inside front cover are C1 and C2.
Then the text, on the third page of document - new section start - NO PREFIX, START NUMBERING at 1.
The last two pages in document, one more section start- inside back, start numbering with 3, prefix C. Last page is C4.
That''s how I set up text + cover. But if the book is a selfcover you may not have to do that.
Sometimes you have i, ii, iii, etc, I just use section starts. My doc pages match my printed folios, no confusion. I always get rid of that default prefix InDesign wants to add (Sec1:) I don't like it, it's unnecessary
You will run into problems if the right hand pages are even numbers. But that's bad design and incorrect and asking for trouble
One thing I like to tell customers: please include printed page numbers. Then anyone can figure out the page order. There is nothing worse than a long book with no page numbers printed.
North America
Europe, Middle East and Africa
Asia Pacific
Copyright © 2012 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All rights reserved.
Use of this website signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use and Online Privacy Policy (updated 07-14-2009).