I urge everyone to try to keep the following in mind when posting:
1. Folks visit here because it's known as a good place to get help.
2. Some people may ask for more than their fair share of help.
3. Not everyone knows the same things nor has the same needs.
4. Some people may be more expert than others at some things.
5. We can ALL stand to learn from each other.
Frankly the level of personal confrontation is and has been FAR too high on this board, and it shouldn't be tolerated. It often even pulls others who wouldn't otherwise be negative into the wrong mode.
I ask that everyone please consider respecting everyone else's opinion and right to be here. Please think twice before sending a barb someone's way.
Let's talk about concepts, not people, shall we? There's room for everyone here.
Have a wonderful day, and most of all, have fun with Photoshop!
-Noel
Noel,
This is a somewhat similar thread, that has just been started in the Video Lounge. Obviously, that is not PS-specific, and is geared more towards the PrPro fora. However, some of the same feelings appear.
Hunt
All "arguments" can be done in a civil and respectful manner. I've been on forums where the "community" has decayed into an unmoderated mass of sarcasm, snide comments, destructive criticism and hatred. Personally, I have no desire to be a part of that type of community.
We can all have different opinions, but as long as we respect each other for their time, knowledge and experience, everything should stay on the up and up.
When someone posts on here and they steal the software: it is on. The buttheads deserve to be attacked.
This forum has really toned down since the new board software came into town. A lot of real pro's, people who eat and breathe Photoshop, left in droves never to be seen again. Other then Lawrence beating me up once in a while for my spelling errors (
) this place is really calm now. Not like the good ole days that John already pointed out.
For the most part some people have locked horns and moved on to the next subject. Nobody lost a eye and there were no animals injured.
Unfortunately, that sends an email to the offending user, letting them know they're getting under someone's skin, which is exactly the opposite of how it should be...
J,
Not quite sure that I agree with you here. If a person is being abusive, or is accused of being so, maybe a bit of a "nudge" will get their attention? It would with me.
Over the decades, I have observed many great contributors, who, for whatever reason, has limited "people skills." They did solve issues quickly, and did provide tips on how to do a particular operation, but did so in an abrasive way. Hey, that is why T/S and C/S are never invited to the Official Adobe Picnic at the same time - different jobs, requiring different skills.
Some people know the subject better than almost everyone else, while some great teachers, might not be blessed with that infinite knowledge. Who is the better? Only the poster can make that distinction.
Now, if one knows the product intimately, maybe all they need is a bit of a critique on presenting that knowledge in a most useful manner. One would never want to loose an expert, or at least they should not. OTOH, maybe the forum would be best served, if they made a few modifications in their delivery.
If I became aware that I was doing something wrong in my replies to posters, I would want to know. I would then work to make necessary changes, what ever they might be. Along those very lines, I have been contacted on a food/wine board, by some MOD's, with issues. Most are "bogus," in my eyes, but a very few have made an impression, and I have altered a few habits. I have learned a few things. Though I might not agree with every complaint, I appreciate the critique. Even when I feel 100% confident that I followed every guideline, I review all posts to that thread. Maybe I was too deeply into my evening wine tastings? ![]()
Though I might disagree with you on this particular subject, I still respect your contributions and toast your knowledge and the help that you have supplied to so many PS users. That is what it should be about.
Hunt
I do agree, regarding the civility, but have to admit that I have not seen, what you seem to be alluding to. Now, I do not hang out here, as much as I once did. I just do not see what it appears that you are talking about, but might just have missed it.
Most of the replies that I see are trying to address the OP's question, or problem. There are few riffs, by my observations. Do you have any specific instances? Like I said, maybe I am missing something.
Good luck,
Hunt
Now, you do bring up a real issue. I have not seen as much of this behavior, as I have in the past, when dozens of warez-kiddies would show up and demand that the forum regulars help them get their pirated versions up and running. Over time, I think that I have seen most of the possible excuses for justification and rationalization - "I'm a poor artist, poor student, father of 43, avowed anti-capitalist communist, paying for my dad' habit... " In the end, the answer is the same, "we all paid for our version of PS (or fill in the blank), and support Adobe."
Hope that we see fewer of these, as the years go by.
Hunt
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}dec9 wrote:
...
This forum has really toned down since the new board software came into town. A lot of real pro's, people who eat and breathe Photoshop, left in droves never to be seen again.
When I joined these forums the new board software was already in place. I actually find these forums pretty usable. What was so much better about the old software? Was it more customer-friendly, or was it just a matter of not being able to migrate threads and profiles that made people leave?
The old forum was snappier. It used simple list views and no fancies at all, which worked reasonably well within the whole Adobe site, which, as we all know, is generally a tad on the slow side. The current forum is much laggier due to al lthat JavaScript stuff bringing more overhead. As to why people leave or get removed is open to speculation and certainly not something relevant for a public user-to-user forum. There are other places for that.
Mylenium
Great thoughts, all. Thank you.
To me it seems healthy debate comes from being passionate about concepts and ideas, and the best debate attempts to separate itself as best it can from personalities.
Attempts to suppress a viewpoint, on the other hand, are just the opposite, unhealthy to the extreme.
Some years of participation on photo/art review sites have taught me that an "Oreo cookie" approach is often good. Say something nice, present your critique, then say something good again to wrap up. This builds on the theory that a person will only listen to you if they feel good about hearing from you. Of course this doesn't directly apply to many types of questions/threads.
I have to agree wholeheartedly with one point noted above: I'm not at all tolerant of people wanting help stealing software. Being stern but respectful in that case may influence some idiot into doing the right thing - or not (he must be an idiot for announcing publicly that he's stealing). I like to point out to them that people feed their families on the proceeds made from selling software, and how would they like it if we just went and stole their stuff. One day they'll grow up.
-Noel
Noel Carboni wrote:
I have to agree wholeheartedly with one point noted above: I'm not at all tolerant of people wanting help stealing software. Being stern but respectful in that case may influence some idiot into doing the right thing - or not (he must be an idiot for announcing publicly that he's stealing). I like to point out to them that people feed their families on the proceeds made from selling software, and how would they like it if we just went and stole their stuff. One day they'll grow up.
-Noel
You are much more of an optimist than I, sir.
But, good thoughts, nonetheless.
Noel, your analogy assumes that the chocolate cookie of an oreo is in some way, superior to the creme, and therefore inappropriately depicted as the positive.
I submit to you the fact that Nabisco doesn't make "Double Cookie Oreos" but instead, "Double STUFF (creme) Oreos". We all know which part of the Oreo is most delicious.
I rest my case.
....now where can I find some Oreos? ![]()
What I found a little bit vial about pirate software was that quite people were being accused before there was any proof. My concept was that eventually these individuals do say something that indicates they have pirate software and my view is too make my opposition clear at that point and refuse help. I would just prefer that people weren't putting the cart before the horse in this case.
Some people come here to be directors and not participants. Being a participant means a certain equality at a basic human level while director means I trump you because i have more___(fill in the blank). I appreciate those who truly participate because this is a group of interested and informed although on different levels and in different degrees. When the heavyweights tread lightly and with respect for the dignity of the posters, I am relieved. Their egos are not tied up in being BMOC.
I'm reminded here of a story about Albert Einstein. He was invited to address a gathering, IIRC and when he was introduced, he got up and said Thank you, I have nothing to say and sat down, to the shock and consternation of the audience. Sensing this discomfort, he rose again and said When I have something to say, Ill be glad to come back and say it. (no quote as I am running on memory here!).
That has stayed with me ever since.
Bart,
I always feel that asking a question - "is this the full-paid version, or did you buy from ____?" usually points things up quickly.
Usually, the poor poster was actually a victim of attempting to get a good price, and are surprised that they have pirated software. A very few are not surprised (guess that the key-gen gave it away?), and then go on to try and defend their use of such software. Never have heard a worthy excuse, but I'm so danged old-school, that it takes a lot of convincing.
Hunt
Your observations have a lot of merit. Going back to before the days of the Internet, when everything similar was in News Groups, there was a cute (but true) list of "the usual suspects," with descriptions of how they participated and were likely to react. I cannot find my link to that list of "characters," but if I do, will attach it. It would not have taken one long, before they found most of the players. Heck, I found myself in that list, very quickly.
Hunt
"A lot of real pro's, people who eat and breathe Photoshop, left in droves never to be seen again."
Where did they go? I heard Facebook, but no thanks to that. I miss those folks, even the occasional pissing contests. Not that 'yous guys aren't interesting or anything like that. It's just hard not to feel that the pool of knowledge around here has gotten diluted. Or is that deluded?
My spelling sucks too...
function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}TLL... wrote:
"A lot of real pro's, people who eat and breathe Photoshop, left in droves never to be seen again."
Where did they go?
And pertinently, why did they go?
-Noel
Forget the handful that were banned – it is the true industry pros, with expertise from all stages of production that are missed here.
It is interesting that they all disappeared at the time of the switch to jive or at the latest when it became obvious that hardly any of the comments on the new software would or could be acted upon.
North America
Europe, Middle East and Africa
Asia Pacific