Hi all
The audio comes & go in the time line & the video is pixelated.
Al is fine in preview monitor.
My system: CS5, Asus p7p55d, i5 quad cpu, ATI Radeon 4890, 4gig ddr3 ram. Win7 64bit.
What am I doing wrong.
Please help
Tiaan
You can change the sequence settings whenever you want. In the project window, if you drag a clip down to the New Item icon at the bottom of that window a new sequence will automatically open. That sequence will have all the right settings to match that clip. Assuming that all the clips in the project are the same you can then add the rest of those clips to the new sequence. That should take care of any concern over whether you are working with a proper sequence.
Your computer has to work pretty hard to keep up with AVCHD playback. Your GPU is not capable of using the new CUDA hardware acceleration so that might be contributing to the problem. But that usually results in jerky playback, not the sort of issue with pixelation and audio cutting in and out that your originally described.
Aside from the pixelation, is the video playback smooth from start to finish?
Is the .wav audio in the same sequence as the PCM audio? If so, the PCM audio could be messing up all of the other audio. As a test, try the .wav files in a separate sequence.
If that still doesn't work, then it's likely your CPU is the bottleneck. Not all i5 processors are quad-core. If you have an i5 600 series, it is only dual-core. AVCHD will overwhelm a dual-core processor, and if that happens, then Pr will drop audio playback in an attempt to maintain video playback. That could explain the audio dropouts you are hearing.
-Jeff
I can't imagine Sony doing anything different enough with it that it won't work but still call it LPCM.
Jeff and the other Jim describe a new version of Sony's occassional odd decisions. I still use a PDX10 - which Premiere has (and still does) capture as two mono tracks. This the result of sony's brief experiment with a new way to deal with 4 track audio. Why they created a new method with the ability to fool regular system's never did make sense to me. (Scenalyzer captures PDX10 audio fine btw.)
There are a number of new cameras like the Sony NX5, NEX-VG10 (despite the sexy look only barely mediocre at best) and the Panny HS700 and the rest of that Panny range that give you the option to record audio as what they call PCM, or as AC3. That so called PCM is in fact LPCM that PR can't handle and the AC3 edits perfectly fine.
Harm,
Are you basing your judgement of the NEX-VG10 on just the specifications or have you actually given it a test run? We would like to hear your reasoning behind your comment.
I've had some experience with one and while the feature set is amateur I found the weight and quality of output to be very good for shooting in situations where one might not be comfortable with a heavier, more expensive pro camera.
Jim
Jim,
Have a look here:http://www.videoaktiv.de/201009164888/Artikel/CAMCORDER/Wechselwirkung .html
and read the first test results. Disastrous would be too much, but the result is not, I repeat not good. The final result is comparable to a Sony HDR-CX105, but at triple the price.
Sometimes it pays to have more than just English reviews. If you add other languages you have more info and different views.
Any way, here is the rough translation of the conclusions:
"With the VG10 Sony offers filmmakers the advantages of the photoworld like a large chip and exchangeable lenses, As good as the concept sounds: Unfortunately Sony has not translated it consequently for filmmakers. The electronics of the chip only allow for 25 FPS, and the image quality is lacking. Also lacking is manual audio settings, that should be a given in this price range. The low-light quality is below mediocre and the noise levels (both in the image and audio) are mediocre at best."
Resolution is plain disappointing, video noise at 900 lumen is bottom line, contrast ratio is borderline, So draw your own conclusion...
Yeah, I read that. Here is another review http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/camcorders/vg10.shtml that mentions some weaknesses as well as some good points. Having some experience with it and time spent looking at the resulting video I can say that it does produce very good video and acceptable audio, for the specific situation where it was being used. These reviews tend to spend a lot of time comparing this camera to still cameras that are being adapted to shoot video.
I certainly wouldn't expect this camera to replace a pro level camera where more control over both the video and audio recording is necessary, but I also wouldn't want to risk that pro level camera in some of the situations where this lower cost but adequate camera will be used.
And WOW, have we ever managed to hijack this thread?? ![]()
North America
Europe, Middle East and Africa
Asia Pacific