Skip navigation
Currently Being Moderated

System requirements for Premiere Pro CS5

Mar 13, 2011 10:03 AM

Adobe has on its website the Adobe Premiere Pro CS5: System Requirements

 

Unfortunately, this overview is severely lacking in realism and a lot of people were disappointed when their system met these minimum requirements, but still would not do what they expected, or at least not without jerkiness, hiccups and similar issues.

 

The problem with these requirements as stated is that they are really bare minimum requirements to install the software, but unfortunately it does not tell how well a certain system will perform with the myriad of codecs used and the different needs and expectations people may have about their editing rig. Since this issue is nearly a year old now and nothing tangible has changed, I decided to write this article to help people understand what is realistic to expect, what influences the hardware choices in order to use CS5 to full satisfaction.

 

CAVEAT: This is my personal opinion, in no way authorized or endorsed by Adobe, who have not seen anything I write here till the moment it has been published here.

 

Context:

 

The nature of one's editing projects can have a major impact on the hardware required to run projects effectively. Long form documentaries, delivered on BRD demand different hardware and priorities in hardware setup then music clips with lots of multicam work and color effects delivered to the web, or wedding video's delivered on DVD. And unfortunately, there is no simple rule saying that if you edit X, you need Y hardware.

 

The second thing that has a major impact is the source material, the codec used. Back in the old days things were very simple, you had DV material from a tape based camera and that was it. Nowadays, things have grown much more complex. The number of codecs used in source material has grown enormously, the number of formats and frame rates has grown in a similar fashion. We used to have 480, now we have added 720, 1080, 2K, 3K, 4K plus various DSLR and other formats, we had interlaced, now we have progressive as well, we used to have 25 or 29.97 FPS, now we have 24, 25, 29.97, 60 and even more frame rates. We had DV, now we have MPEG2, HDV, XDCAM, P2, AVCHD, RED, Cineform, Matrox, and numerous other codecs.

 

This makes it all the more confusing for people to know what they need when they start out with video editing to run CS5 successfully.

 

The codec issue:

 

Some codecs are easy to handle for a computer, others are difficult to handle. It is generally known that DV material is very easy to handle and AVCHD is pretty tough to handle. The general rule is that the more compressed the material is, the harder it is for the computer to edit this. GOP (Group of Pictures) structure is an extra burden. The higher the resolution, the harder it is on the computer.

 

To simplify matters one could differentiate codecs and source material in three categories, based on their properties:

 

Codec.png

 

Of course boundaries when using three categories are not always very clear, but the tendency is rather clear. Easy codecs are in the upper left corner, difficult codecs are in the lower right corner. For that reason we have identified three categories, Easy, Intermediate and Difficult.

 

This is somewhat similar to the color coding PR uses with none, yellow and red in the time line. It is not complete in the overview of common codecs, but is intended to show what the impact can be of different codecs and the hardware requirements.

 

I realize this is a limited overview and generic in nature. It will not answer all questions, but may be helpful to avoid disappointments. It also has a number of limitations. For instance, uncompressed MS AVI SD material. No GOP structure, no compression, low resolution, that should be at the top left corner, right? Wrong. Uncompressed does not burden the CPU, but is a definite burden on the memory and disk I/O system.

 

What does that mean in terms of requirements?

 

System requirements:

System requirements CS5.png

 

If the codecs you generally use are slightly more than just plain "easy", look at the improvemnts in the next column and repeat for the next column if applicable.

 

I hope this can benefit people to understand there is more to choosing a system than just following the Adobe site.

 

Additions or suggestions for improvements are welcome.

 
Replies 1 2 3 Previous Next
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 13, 2011 10:08 AM   in reply to Harm Millaard

    I'd be especially interested to see people's responses based on real-world experience.

     

    When folks respond, please be sure to state as many details as possible, but most especially whether you've installed the recent updates, since that has a big impact on performance.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 13, 2011 10:24 AM   in reply to Harm Millaard

    This is great information.  I had no idea my GOP's were choking my system so much, but it makes complete sense; those ginormous multi-mega-pixel images X hundreds

     

    Thanks for the info!

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 13, 2011 10:31 AM   in reply to Todd_Kopriva

    >people's responses based on real-world experience

     

    My CS5/AVCHD 1st Impressions http://forums.adobe.com/thread/652694?tstart=0 includes a link to the computer I built... since the GTX 285 is no longer sold, I would now go with a GTX 460 or whatever is the current "best bang for the buck" - AND I would buy 4Gig-by-3Sticks memory to be able to expand from 12Gig to 24Gig if needed


    For my home hobbyist, family movies (which means that I am not trying to recreate Star Wars with video effects or many layers) AVCHD editing is "as smooth as spreading warm butter on hot toast" (also the MP4 video from wife's Flip camera)


    My 3 hard drives are configured as... (WD = Western Digital)
    1 - 320G WD Win7 64bit Pro and all programs
    2 - 320G WD Win7 swap file and video projects
    3 - 1T WD all video files... read and write

     

    Bottom line is that CS5 and AVCHD on my current computer is MUCH faster than SD DV AVI on my previous Pentium 4 computer

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 13, 2011 10:55 AM   in reply to Harm Millaard

    I'd move HDV into the "intermediate" category - XDCam EX is essentially the same codec.

    I'd put DVCPro50 and DVCPro HD into the "EASY" category, along with DV.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 13, 2011 2:53 PM   in reply to John T Smith

    on #2. is it a external sata with a usb connection or u have something like a Drobo?

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 15, 2011 9:48 AM   in reply to Harm Millaard

    Fantastic article. I really like how you differentiate the needed hardware based on the CODEC to be used. This is a great approach and one I think I will "borrow" for future articles on Videoguys

     

    Just a heads up, I've updated our DIY8 article to reflect the latest info and chipset pricing. Intel Hex core has fallen to $599. I'm still onthe fence about the new Sandy bridge chips. while I thinkt ehy are fantastic for laptops, not so sure I like them for workstations. When you add PCIe cards for I/O (eg Matrox MXO2 Mini or AJA Kona) and an exteral RAID controller, I'm concerend about throughput bottlenecks.

     

    Once agian, great job on the article.

     

    Gary

    Videoguys.com

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 28, 2011 10:57 AM   in reply to Harm Millaard

    First off, Harm...I've been reading your responses all over the Adobe forums and I have to say thanks. You seem to be very knowledgeable and I'm hoping you can shed some light on issues I've been having related to system requirements.

     

    Basically, I'm barely a step above hardware illiterate -- an important step, but still. I saw the article Adobe posted on system requirements and was immediately concerned that I do not have the correct graphics card for my workflow to, well, flow.

     

    I've seen how this works, so let me get down to the meat and potatoes:

     

    (copied verbatim from the "about this mac" menu)

    Mac version 10.6.6

    Processor: 2 x 2.66 GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon

    Memory: 10GB 667 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM

    Running off a 1TB drive

     

    (copied verbatim from the "more info" tab)

    Model Name: Mac Pro

      Model Identifier: MacPro1,1

      Processor Name: Dual-Core Intel Xeon

      Processor Speed: 2.66 GHz

      Number Of Processors: 2

      Total Number Of Cores: 4

      L2 Cache (per processor): 4 MB

      Memory: 10 GB

      Bus Speed: 1.33 GHz

      Boot ROM Version: MP11.005C.B08

     

    Adobe CS5 Production Suite installed

    Drobo RAID via Firewire 400 (pretty sure it's 400, not 800)

     

    Here's what I am in dire need of: someone to tell me once and for all that my system is (a) just fine, or (b) needs work. I am on a borrowed system essentially. I started work at an ad agency and came onto a system that had been used for video by someone who did not do video by trade. The girl before me was a graphic artist who, unfortunately, got roped into video work because there was no one else to do it. Anyway, since I took over working on this machine, the system drive has failed once and it was just cloned again this morning because the disk utility said the disk was failing yet again.

     

    Aside from that misfortune, PPro has a ton of bugs, runs about as fast as cold molasses and frequently leaves artifacting and lines in exported video projects, none of which are longer than 10 minutes. My native format for video is .MXF from the Sony XDCAM HD -- beautiful stuff, comes in just fine, works wonderfully on the timeline until I start keyframing, then I grab a pillow and take a nap for 2 minutes at a time while it loads the frame I'm working on.

     

    I'm rambling a bit, so I will tie this up and allow you to respond...if you require more information I'm more than willing to provide it, assuming I know what you're talking about. You may need to dumb things down for me, sorry.

     

    Thanks!

     

    Kristin

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 28, 2011 11:57 AM   in reply to Harm Millaard

    It didn't stand to reason that CS5 was quite that buggy. I know it's not perfect yet, but it will get darn close. Unfortunately, I don't have much control over switching from Mac to PC platforms. Can you offer any advice for a better build on the current platform? Honestly, any specifics you have, even if its directing me to a thread that could shed some light on the subject, that'd be amazing. The higher-ups here are rather dead-set. I will need to make a very compelling case to see any improvement. Assuming I don't tear all of my hair out and/or throw this thing out the window before then.

     

    Thanks for the speedy response by the way. Take care,

     

    Kristin

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 28, 2011 5:37 PM   in reply to Harm Millaard

    Hi Everyone,

    I am new to this forum and have some questions before I purchase Adobe® Creative Suite® 5 Production Premium software.  I am planning on starting a business taking photos, and video from many sources, cameras for editing.  Primarily, I will be working on Weddings and similar events.  Below are the questions:

     

    1.    Is Adobe® Creative Suite® 5 Production Premium the Software of choice? (I welcome other choices)

    2.    Does my computer have the necessary requirements? (See below for my computer hardware)

    3.    Any other third party software recommended?

    4.    Hardware recommendations additions for the computer

    5.    Camera choices, video camera choices and accessories choices.  (keep cost concerns in mind)

     

    Computer:

    Windows 7-64 bit Professional

    Processor:     Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 x990 @3.47 overclocked to 3.91 (six core)

    Memory:         24 GB

    Disk Drives:   1) C300 True Solid State Hard Drive (256 GB) C: Drive

                            2) WD Caviar Black 2 TB SATA Hard Drives D: and E: Drives

    RAID:             None

    Video:            NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti

    Audio:            ASUS Xonar Essence STX Audio

    Motherboard:Asus Rampage III Extreme

     

     

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 12, 2011 1:44 PM   in reply to Photo_1985

    Adobe software tends to be the industry standard when it comes to multimedia.  Since you are looking at photography, video and multimedia I believe Adobe Creative Suite would be best as all the software is right there.

     

    Your computer should be fine when it comes to handeling file types.  You have a strong rig that is well built, I believe you should be able to handle almost anything you throw at it.

     

    As for third party software, I don't think it is necessary-unless you need it for something specific.

     

    I'd possibly suggest RAIDing the two caviars.  You will get redundancy, faster read writes and that.  I'd wait to see what the others around here say.

     

    As for video cameras, you can go prosumer or professional...your choice.  I have a Canon Vixia M31 (prosumer) and that seems to do a nice job.  As for a cameras, stick to DSLRs.  Canon makes a bunch of nice gear.  I'm not to much into that gig yet, but am expanding from web design and development to multimedia (video/audio).  Don't forget tripods, cables and that...it really depends on what you want to do.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 12, 2011 7:27 PM   in reply to JsnKrst9

    Thanks so much.  I feel better about spending the added price on CS5.5 Production Premium which includes Premiere Pro.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 12, 2011 11:00 AM   in reply to Harm Millaard

    Harm,

    A while back you gave me some advice re a kit build for Production Premium, which I submitted for consideration, and for your thoughts I thank youl. Several months on, the powers that be (UK Civil Service) have decided to go a different purchase route. The request has ended up in the hands of a well known computer supplier 'chain' (a prefered supplier) and because they can't supply the Sabertooth board you recommended they have come back to my bosses with a their recommendation based on what they will supply. My question is, would you accept it, will it take advantage of CUDA and do you foresee any problems:

     

    I am shooting with a Panasonic AG-HMC151E AVCHD. H.264 MPEG-4 compression.

     

    The chain are quoting:

     

    Windows 7 64 Ultimate

    CS5.5 PP

    on:

    Intel DX58sO2 Extreme

    i7-970

    Trudata 12GB DDR3 PC3-8500 1066MHz Unbuffered 204-pin

    HP NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2.0GB

    1 x WD 450 velociraptor 10k

    3 x WD 1TB AV-GP Greenpower 64MB SATA-II (NO RAID)

    800W PSU

     

    The problem with preferred suppliers is you get what you are given. Do you think there any 'conflicts' in the above spec?

     

    Appreciate your opinion

    Regards

    Peter

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 12, 2011 11:29 AM   in reply to PeterB55

    Sorry to say this, but the chain made a few wrong choices. The AV-GP hard drives are not compatible with PCs at all - but instead they are designed specifically for standalone HDD-based DVRs and PVRs. And their "800W" PSU could have been a generic one that could have handled or provided barely half that much before failing. And the Quadro 4000 costs way too much money given its hardware specs (it is based on the original power-hungry GF100 that the GTX 480, GTX 470 and GTX 465 were also based on, but cut to only 256 cores on the Quadro 4000 versus the 480, 448 and 352 cores on the GTX 480, 470 and 465, respectively). For so much money, there is zero practical performance improvement in CS5 over the cheaper GeForce GPUs. And as I have found out, 12GB of RAM is not quite enough RAM for CS5.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 12, 2011 12:37 PM   in reply to Harm Millaard

    Harm,

     

    I did forget to mention that the DX58SO2 is missing a few voltage settings that are necessary to successfully overclock the i7-9xx CPUs more than moderately. But being an Extreme Series motherboard, its BIOS does allow running the RAM above their stock speeds. But even with that, I found that I could barely achieve an overclock to 3.9 GHz with any of the 45nm i7-9xx quad-core CPUs on Intel-branded X58 motherboards when entry-level X58 motherboards from other brands could run stably with those same CPUs at 4.2 or 4.3 GHz.

     

    And don't plan on using the eSATA port(s) on the DX58SO or any other Intel Extreme Series motherboard: Intel is one of the few motherboard brands to use an eSATA chipset from Marvell rather than the more common Jmicron. The speed, especially the write speed, of the Marvell eSATA chipset is pathetically slow compared to that of the Jmicron eSATA controller. I could not get an interface speed of more than about 50 MB/s from the Marvell 61xx eSATA chipset (versus more than double that on the Jmicron eSATA controller) unless I also install the Marvell 61xx RAID driver - and then, the installation of that driver creates new compatibility issues.

     

    Message was edited by: RjL190365

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 12, 2011 2:38 PM   in reply to RjL190365

    RjL/Harm

     

    Thank you SO MUCH for your pearls of wisdom.

     

    A, we are a UK Gov service.

    B, the procurement is being made by the local council, a partner.

    C, their prefered supplier is PC World Business Centre.

     

    And I am stuck between a rock and a hard place trying to get something decent that will give 3/4 years of service (if we still have jobs that is).

    The PC World build solution works out around £4,700 plus tax.

     

    So, where do I go from here? I'm on my own fighting several corners and people who either do not know what they are doing or have their own agendas.

     

    Here is what I want, and maybe you can define what I should be asking for.

     

    CS5.5 PP taking advantage of all it has to offer.

    As Harm previously suggested a Sabertooth from Asus (or maybe there is now something better on the market)?

    A 10k C drive plus 3 x 1TB SATA + one external 1TB

    A GPU that works.

    Appropriate PSU.

     

    Experts all, I bow to your wisdom, can you suggest what my current wish list should be so I may carrry it forth and argue my case?

     

    Regards

    Peter

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 12, 2011 3:14 PM   in reply to PeterB55

    PCWB? My nan would be a better choice and she's dead ;)  Convince the buyer to consider an independent expert.  DVC are in the South. Zen Computer Services are in the North.  Both have been going for years and they know Adobe editing systems inside out.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 16, 2011 7:13 PM   in reply to PeterB55

    Peter,

    I agree with the replied statements.  I am using 24 GB RAM,  Intel(R) X990

    overclocked, two Solid State Drives (one for the OS and one for working on

    the current projects, along with several standard Large SATA and USB Hard

    Drives for storage.  I am not using RAID but plan on updating shortly.

     

    Photo_1985

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 17, 2011 8:56 AM   in reply to Harm Millaard

    Thanks for the informative discussion. I'm just starting out with PPCS5.5. I would like to use a Mac Book Pro 13 with i5 8GB Ram to learn PP5.5. If I use a codec such as ProRes or Avid (can't remember the name dvi?) and a 3 hard drive set up with 7200 rpm FW800 would this be enough to work with HDV?

     

    I plan to get another desktop in about six months to a year but would like to use a MBP 13 in the meantime. I'd like to use this for instructional video in HD. What would editing say 30 minutes that would look like HD on a HDTV? Would rendering take the longest? Could I just let it render overnight? Or is this just not a good idea to use a 2 core? Would it be too jumpy and delay to learn how to edit? I suppose I could go straight for the desktop but would rather start off on the laptop and get the desktop later as I'll probably not be doing anything dynamic for a while. At the most 2 cameras and be able to edit sound overlays, etc.

     

    thanks for any advice..

    John C

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 17, 2011 9:36 AM   in reply to Islanders66

    It's not a good idea to edit anything HD on any system (laptop or desktop) based on a dual-core CPU. In fact, HD video editing beyond simple HDV requires a CPU with at least four physical cores in order to work well (the mobile i5 CPUs are only dual-core with HyperThreading rather than true quad-core). Unfortunately, all of the MacBook Pros fall well short of Adobe's minimum practical requirements: None of them are available at all with Nvidia GPUs (all of them either use integrated Intel HD graphics or offer only AMD/ATi GPUs - all of which are not supported at all at present in MPE's GPU-accelerated mode, and thus would "permanently" lock Premiere Pro into MPE software-only mode).

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 17, 2011 9:44 AM   in reply to RjL190365

    Agreed!!!!  Only trouble results by not using enough computer power for an

    application.  Money and time wasted along with lots of frustration that can

    be avoided by just saving a little more.

    Tom

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 17, 2011 10:53 AM   in reply to Photo_1985

    Appreciate the suggestions. With that I'm inclined to get a desktop system. Which is less expensive the Mac or Windows? There are so many options now I'm researching building one within my budget but also want it to be functional.  

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 17, 2011 11:21 AM   in reply to Islanders66

    Clearly you get more processing power with a PC for less money at this time.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 17, 2011 12:18 PM   in reply to Islanders66

    Do not burn any bridges, look at both and get what fills your needs best.

    The general rule is that Mac is better at these applications.  However, I

    am not so sure about that.  I have a PC and* very pleased*.  May I have been

    happier with Mac?  Maybe, but I have a lot of applications that I do not

    wish to repurchase, so I looked at total price of the whole system

    (including software) and the PC won.  For you it may be different.  Please

    remember one thing, both Mac and PC will run CS 5.5 just fine without

    crashing or doing funny things. I, so far, (knock on wood) have been 100%

    error and crash free.  Get what you need and save a little more if needed,

    it will still be there.

    Just get it before December of 2012 because you know what 2012 brings.  Re: System requirements for Premiere Pro CS5

    Photo_1985

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 17, 2011 1:08 PM   in reply to Photo_1985

    Excellent points. For me it will come down to price. They both have their pros and cons. I like Macs, but I'll have to price them out and compare them. I managed to put together a 6 core intel with nevada on newegg for about $2,200 that included a decent monitor. I'll have to see what it's missing. I may start another thread just to see if I'm on the right track. I appreciate the responses. A desktop would be more practical for me at home, and later an inexpensive laptop.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 19, 2011 4:19 PM   in reply to Islanders66

    Best to you.

    Tom

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 20, 2011 9:11 AM   in reply to RjL190365

    Thanks RjL appreciate all the input from the experts. This leaves me at the starting blocks again and as many of you have experience of CS5.X would you be good enough to list a minimum build that will make use of the upper capabilities of the programme?

     

    I have taken the input about PCW but still have to go through this process of at least two quotes.

    So any kit spec advice would be appreciated.

    Peter

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 20, 2011 9:16 AM   in reply to Photo_1985

    Hi Photo_1985, I'm interested in the fact you are using SS drives as I thought Adobe would not allow installation of CS5 on a SS drive (assume for reasons of piracy)??

     

    Peter

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 20, 2011 9:35 AM   in reply to PeterB55

    Just wanted to let you all know we've published a DIY update on our blog: goo.gl/HQMjG

     

    Videoguys DIY Update: Sandy Bridge - Getting closer with the ASUS P8Z68-V PRO Motherboard

     

    Over the past few months we've taken some heat on some NLE user  forums for our recommendation to NOT use Sandy Bridge CPUs for building  your NLE workstation. We didn't take this lightly and we understood the  frustration it would create for people wanting to build a new NLE  workstation. You want to use the latest technology and take advantage of  the speed and performance per dollar of the Sandy bridge CPUs.

    Our Sandy Bridge concerns where not about the CPU, but rather the  available chipsets and motherboards. The first chipsets had very real  potential problems that gave us reason for the concern. The two biggest  being the shared PCIe bandwidth and the integrated graphics. When  building a computer for video editing job number one is to avoid any  system bottlenecks.

     

    While a system can be great for gaming, it may not be good for video  editing. Gamers want the highest possible video framerates and the  quickest possible seek times. For HD video editing we are working with  very large files, that can be very heavily compressed.  A bottleneck  anywhere can create all kinds of performance, stability and workflow  issues. So when we post a new DIY build, we are looking for a system  that can handle the most rigorous video editing timelines, with as much  realtime performance as possible. When we have to render or encode, we  want it to be the fastest possible, while delivering files that are 100%  defect free.  That's why it's important to start with the chipset  first, then find the right motherboard and from there add the components  that will maximize the performance for video editing.

     

    As I said earlier, the first couple of rounds of Sandy Bridge  motherboards did not impress me. While I know that some system  integrators and expert DIY builders are using Sandy Bridge today with  great success, I wanted to wait until I found a chipset and motherboard  that addressed my main concerns without sacrificing Sandy Bridge  performance. We may have found it! I've been doing some research on the  Asus P8Z68-V Pro and I'm very interested in it. It addresses two of our  main Sandy Bridge concerns: PCIe bandwidth and Integrated Graphics. http://goo.gl/HQMjG

     

    I'm still not ready to recommend Sandy Bridge or the Asus P8Z68-V Pro  motherboard yet. It is very new and I want to see more feedback from  users. Both for video editing and gaming and just general computers. We  are going to keep looking into it, and if it meets our expectations, we  will begin our DIY9 build around it. That said, I really want to see a  Sandy Bridge motherboard with integrated Thunderbolt! read more...

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 20, 2011 10:02 AM   in reply to Harm Millaard

    Harm,

     

    Will do. Any word on price points? Intel may price them out of the range of our DIY systems. We try to stick with CPUs under $500

     

    Gary

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 20, 2011 10:36 AM   in reply to Harm Millaard

    I found this article that has the middel pocessor i7-3960X hexcore at $999

     

    http://www.zdnet.com/blog/computers/intels-three-sandy-bridge-e-proces sors-to-be-known-as-core-i7-3000-series-extreme-edition/6384

     

    he Core i7-3960X will be the new performance champ, with its six  cores bumped up to 3.3GHz and 3.9GHz in Turbo mode. It will come with  15MB of L3 cache and an unlocked multiplier. As with previous hexa-core  Extreme Editions, this processor should run around $999 when it’s  released.

     

    The Core i7-3820 will reportedly be priced similarly to the Core  i7-2600K, the reigning king of Sandy Bridge processors, and will provide  an interesting alternative for those who don’t need the i7-2600K’s  unlocked multiplier. It will also square off against AMD’s forthcoming  Bulldozer line, the priciest of which will be priced in the same  ballpark.

     

    Gary

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 20, 2011 12:32 PM   in reply to Videoguys

    so Gary,

     

    1) i am a little confused.. so you stated you didnt like the first gen Sandy mobos due to onboard video and lack of PCIe lanes?

    yet the board you mentioned indeed has onboard video?

    where the board i recommend ( original P67 chipset) does NOT have onboard video and never did. the H series does.

     

    so which is it?

     

    2) lack of PCIe lanes! even more confused on this.

    to be clear the Z68 chipset DOES NOT add any more PCIe lanes. only the C206 chipset does this (4 more) and requires Xeon single SB processors. and slower ram. or buying a mobo with the 3rd party add on which has been around from day 1 for SB

     

    so i fail to see any changes from your prior stance with a Z68 board.

    the only added benefit is the quick sync which i can tell you is a PITA to get working..

    http://forums.adobe.com/message/3760601#3760601

    but is pretty cool..

     

    to address your original concerns about Sandy read this..

    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/854514?tstart=30

     

    and lastly concerning the upcoming SB-E processors.

    they will launched on the X79 platform 2011 socket with ONLY 4 slots of ram on single processor and 8 for dual Xeon.

    and added PCIe 38 or 40 i believe vs 24 of the sandy and Z68 and 28 of the C206

    they are not a die shrink at launch (ivy comes 3 months later)

    aside from the obvious 6 cores and more cache they dont add much to the present architechture aside from the changed memory controller.

     

    the Ivy will be more advanced with the tri-gate..

     

    as to AMD Bulldozer dont hold your breath on that one..

     

    Scott

    ADK

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 20, 2011 1:55 PM   in reply to Scott Chichelli

    Scott - Thanx for the feedback.I was looking forward to your reaction to my post.

     

    From what I could gather about the Asus Z68 mothterboard that had me so excited was the ability to force the bottom slot to PCIe 4x.  The reviews I read said you can allocate PCIe 4x to the bottom slot at the expense of some extra USB ports. I also thought this would be dedicated bandwidth. If that's not the case, then I guess this Mobo isn't the evolution I had hoped for.

     

    I also had high hopes for the Virtu software. That the d-Mode would allow you to disable the on board graphics while enabling the new encoding instructions embedded in the Sandy bridge processor sounded very cool.  If you could do this and still have the Mercury Playback Engine take full advantage of your dedicated GPU like the GTX470/570, that would be SWEET!

     

    I had also hoped that the Z68 would make quicksync better and easier to set up.

     

    So I guess I still may not be recommending Sandy Bridge for my customers. We'll stick with the i7 970 hex core for now. Which unfortunately has gone up in price fto $575 over the past few weeks. Although I do think that for tapeless workflows that will not require I/O hardware and RAID storgae, Sandy Bridge is a great price/value preformance solution.

     

    Gary

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 20, 2011 2:15 PM   in reply to Videoguys

    HI Gary,

    you can do the same 4x thing on the P67 with the 2nd 16x.

     

    did you read my thread on the sandy bridge? i pretty much covered any potential issues including using a raid card or capture device in a SB platform.

    and FYI we did not disable any USB or anything else. no crazy bios tricks.

     

    Virtu was a disaster and completely useless its for gaming at best..

    quick sync as i said is cool but it will require some fooling around on the end users part with what is the main video output.

    we are offering the Z68 but with the understanding of its pitfalls..

    for many considering it cut renders in 1/2 they will be willing to fool with it.

     

    at this point in the game you might as well wait until the X79 boards and SB-E are out before doing any new DYI systems..

     

     

    Scott

    ADK

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 23, 2011 1:30 PM   in reply to PeterB55

    during a typical install, it asked for a location and decided to make a new folder on the SS called cs4_cs5 and it made me confirmed that it was a valid location cause of letter spacing and vista just installed it as usual. The product key was entered until i install Acrobat X. i think it was because i change the rights prevliges on all my folders.

     
    |
    Mark as:
1 2 3 Previous Next
Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)