Skip navigation
Currently Being Moderated

selecting multiple files and adding/changing output folder

Aug 7, 2011 7:44 PM

Is there a way to select multiple files in Adobe Media Encoder CS5.5 and change or add the output folder for all? It would be great if the output folder could be set in the Preset rather than in the AME Preference.

 
Replies
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 7, 2011 8:01 PM   in reply to trancepriest

    Unfortunately, no; you can't change the output location for multiple files once they've been added to the queue. As a workaround of sorts, you can go into the AME preferences and specify a default output folder; if you do this before adding your batch of clips, all files will be directed there. Changing this preference after files have been added to the queue won't change the destination of those particular files, so remember to do it before setting up your batch.

     

    I've requested this several times: one request was to separate the output path from the file name, so that you change the path for all selected inputs independent of the name (like you can with format and preset), and another request was a dialog asking if you wanted to change the path for multiple files, should you have more than one selected. Personally, I wouldn't want paths as part of presets: if you wanted the same output for multiple clients, for example, you'd have to duplicate your preset multiple times just to change the output location. That could get a little messy, from my perspective, but if you can offer a compelling way to implement that, by all means make a feature request: Adobe Feature Request/Bug Report Form

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 7, 2011 9:34 PM   in reply to Colin Brougham

    one request was to separate the output path from the file name

     

    Can you do that though?  At the OS level, the "name" of the file includes the entire path, not just the part you see when you're in the folder.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 8, 2011 6:24 AM   in reply to Jim Simon

    Why not? We're not talking about the OS level. We're talking about the application level. The application can do whatever it wants--or rather, whatever it's programmed and told to do. You do this when you create a new project, so why not when outputting?

     

    project.png

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 8, 2011 10:14 AM   in reply to Colin Brougham

    The application can only be programmed to do what the OS will allow it to do.  I just wonder if the OS would allow this.  Not saying it can't, and a feature request never hurts.  I'm just musing, is all.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 8, 2011 10:38 AM   in reply to Jim Simon

    Again, it already does--just not for exports. What I requested was that the save location (e.g. folder path) be a separate column in the AME queue and a separate selectable field in the Export Settings window. So--using the AME queue as an example--instead of a single column called Output File, you'd have one called Output Location that is the folder path (clickable hot-text that opens up a file browser dialog) and one called something like Output Filename that when clicked opens up a simple text entry box like the Rename Clip box in Premiere Pro. The actual output combines those elements; it doesn't matter what the OS requires at that point, since its getting exactly what it wants.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 8, 2011 10:42 AM   in reply to Jim Simon

    Yes, this is absolutely possible.  Jim is correct that the OS needs the full file path, name included, in order to write the file.  Colin is correct that at the application level, we can present the destination path and file name as separate variables to the user.  The application then concatenates the two variables together and supplies the OS with the complete output path.

     

    Both of these requests (setting the output path for multiple items at once and disconnecting the UI for the filename from the UI for the path) are improvements that the AME team is considering for a future release. Thanks for the feature requests, guys.  Keep 'em coming.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 8, 2011 10:45 AM   in reply to Tim Kurkoski

    Thanks for the clarification, Tim--I just don't know the fancy words like "variable"

     

    For good measure, I'm sending in another feature request on this--and I'm adding a note that says "Tim says so."

     

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 8, 2011 11:48 AM   in reply to Colin Brougham

    Makes more sense to me now, too.  It does sound like a good idea.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 4, 2013 12:09 PM   in reply to trancepriest

    It's now 2 years later but this still has not made it into the release. I'd settle for the same behavior After Effects has if that would simplify it. This is annoying behavior currently.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 4, 2013 12:15 PM   in reply to Keith Lee

    Keith, which version of AME are you using?

     

    In AME CC (7.0), we added the ability to select multiple output items and change the path for all of them at the same time. So that feature request has been answered.

     

    The displayed output paths are still concatenated. If you'd like them to be separated, I'm afraid the answer is still the same: please file a feature request.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 11, 2013 2:37 PM   in reply to Tim Kurkoski

    I'm using that version I think on my Mac. I tried to change the output path on a multiple selection but could not. I'll look at it again to make sure I did it right.

     
    |
    Mark as:

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Answers + Points = Status

  • 10 points awarded for Correct Answers
  • 5 points awarded for Helpful Answers
  • 10,000+ points
  • 1,001-10,000 points
  • 501-1,000 points
  • 5-500 points