Skip navigation
This discussion is locked

Adobe's New Upgrade Policy (for CS6)

Nov 9, 2011 6:02 PM

  Latest reply: pierat1959, Jan 20, 2012 1:19 AM
Replies 1 2 Previous Next
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 11, 2012 11:34 AM   in reply to gordonwd

    John, Gordon,

     

    AFAIK Adobe hasn't said anything particular about that today, but generally-speaking the company does have a money-back Refund and Return Policy (even if you bought from elsewhere), if that's something you wanted to consider.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 11, 2012 12:03 PM   in reply to ProDesignTools

    Gordon, PDT,

     

    I'm not actually in the felt-forced-to-upgrade-to-CS5.5-in-2011 camp. I happily use CS5 and I've no intentions of upgrading to CS5.5 which offers me nothing for my workflow.

     

    I'm just thinking of those that are.

     

    Adobe's reversals of ill-conceived, ill-timed policy changes invariably get widely applauded but there's always collateral damage to those who do the right thing in the midst of it which few recognise - and there's never a refund.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 11, 2012 12:09 PM   in reply to John Waller

    Hey John, actually there should be a refund available under regular policy for purchases within the past 30 days - that's normal. 

     

    Also don't forget their tiered upgrade pricing whereby customers on more recent versions will pay less to upgrade to CS6 than those on older versions - meaning any outlay to get to CS5.5 would not be wasted but rather stepped closer.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 11, 2012 12:43 PM   in reply to ProDesignTools

    Also don't forget their tiered upgrade pricing whereby customers on more recent versions will pay less to upgrade to CS6 than those on older versions - meaning any outlay to get to CS5.5 would not be wasted but rather stepped closer.

     

    Yes, that's a fair point.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 11, 2012 12:50 PM   in reply to John Waller

    I was devastated by this news.

     

    I am not a pro user but a serious hobbyist.  I'll never recover the outlay for Adobe software.  I started with just PS, then went GoLive and moved on to Creative Suite.  I have been through three versions of that.  Everytime I have ever purchased or upgraded it has always been a difficult decision to manage family/hobby commitments.  I deleiberately skipped CS5 and the ambiguity of CS5.5 and have been regularly pondering the costs of CS6.    Now sadly, I think Adobe has priced me out.

     

    Martin

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 11, 2012 12:55 PM   in reply to ProDesignTools

    Oy vey!

     

    What a firestorm!

     

    I posted earlier about just not worrying about it because I have saved money by continuing to use older versions of Adobe's software. I even did the math.

     

    I just cannot get all cranked up about Adobe. Sorry. Got other fish to fry. While I do agree that some kind of a discount would be really nice for CS6, this is a decision that needs to be made at a pay grade much higher than mine. I'm just fine using Photoshop CS3. I did upgrade Dreamweaver to CS 5.5 because there were a few improvements (over that of CS3) that were worthwhile (the main one is that it understands HTML5 better and does have some of the CSS3 stuff built in). Newer versions of Photoshop are 64-bit but they don't handle my scanner, so they're not adding anything to my workflow.

     

    I have asked for a refund of software one time. It was a request to Intuit for Quicken "essentials" for the Mac, which had none of the essentials I needed in their software. The first version would not print checks!

     

    I upgrade when I see a burning need to. And I feel that I am honestly saving money in not doing the upgrade treadmill.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 11, 2012 1:01 PM   in reply to martcol

    Which news are you devastated by?

     

    The original announcement of the new one version back policy starting with the CS6 upgrade cycle?

     

    Or the new announcement that the introduction of the new one version back policy has been deferred until 31 Dec 2012? i.e. CS3 and CS4 customers have until 31 Dec 2012 to upgrade to CS6, after which one-version-back kicks in.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 11, 2012 1:32 PM   in reply to John Waller

    My wife frequently reminds not to confuse mere management ignorance and stupidity for actual maliciousness.

     

    But, in this case, I've got to believe some avaricious, greedy, ******* in a 3-piece suite on the executive floor at Adobe came up with this idea.  And it got dumped on the user community with the spin that it would SOMEHOW be good for all of us...  And when the screaming got loud enough that some bean counter postulated what it might cost in lost sales, lost good will, and user dissatisfaction, the whole thing was rescinded with yet more spin that "look how wonderful we are, we listened to you...  We're STILL going to do this, but we'll wait a year."

     

    Those that upgraded because of Adobe's coersion should rightfully be angry.  And I suspect there will STILL be a lot of users that have now reconsidered just how much the NEED the upgrade from whatever version they're using to CS6.  No matter what they do, Adobe just looks like a greedy 800 pound gorilla.

     

    But, in deference to my wife, maybe it was just corporate stupidity, not true malice.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 11, 2012 1:48 PM   in reply to davepinminn

    I don't disasgree.

     

    The conception and, especially, the implementation of this new policy has been a spectacular misstep by Adobe from start to finish in my eyes.

     

    The unprecedented Open Letter from Scott Kelby of the NAPP highlighted this in big red letters in the sky.

     

    It can only satisfy the shareholders - definitely not the end users, whatever spin is put on it.

     

    But, it's not going away. It'll just be deferred.

     

    That's the only glimmer of "good" news I see in this latest about turn.

     

    But user dissatisfaction has definitely set in. Adobe has the upper hand while Adobe produces excellent products which everyone wants but they're unwisely abusing their market position. Presently, we all try to find the money in each upgrade cycle and Adobe pricing policies regularly receive intense analysis for fairness. But if a competitor emerges who can do to Adobe what Adobe did (with Indesign) to Quark and penetrate their market, then the rules may change again in the users' favour.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 11, 2012 11:51 PM   in reply to John Waller

    Well I was devasted by the change in u/grade policy.  I hadn't taken my head out of my bucket long enough to hear the other better news ;-)

     

    Martin

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 6:21 AM   in reply to davepinminn

    I am one of those people who are extremely upset that they forced me to buy an upgrade (that i never wanted or needed) then say "oh, BTW you didn't have to upgrade, you're welcome" Nice attitude, but i'm not buying it. They had this plan in motion for some time, but figured the backlash for people who shelled out the money wouldn't be enoough of a concern to wrorry about it. Then they would look good in front of people who wanted the change. It's all BS IMO.

     

    Adobe has yet to understand my concerns with CS5 photoshop not working correctly. They sent me the wrong version, refunded, sent another version and now claim they won't help because they refunded me for a version that I don't even have anymore. Hours on the phone, hours on chat, hours online in forums and still not one of my concerns addressed. I fill out the form to get a "call back" from adobe and after three appointments set up, NO CALLS! so i'm just wasting my time.

     

    PLEASE people keep telling adobe how bad they are at customer service and maybe they will start to listen. I have a product I never wanted, that is not working correctly and no real help from Adobe.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 6:37 AM   in reply to paul campagna

    Bunch of tossers!

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 7:39 AM   in reply to paul campagna

    I am one of those people who are extremely upset that they forced me to buy an upgrade (that i never wanted or needed) then say "oh, BTW you didn't have to upgrade, you're welcome"

     

    Paul, nobody held a gun to your head and forced you to upgrade. Let's be rational here.

     

    Adobe's policy, in a word, sucked. They recognized it was bad. They changed it. I am currently using Photoshop CS3 because I do a lot of scanning and the upgrades of Photoshop do not use TWAIN and do not support in-application scanning (by the way, Adobe's Acrobat Pro does support in-app scanning, so if Adobe were to just borrow a couple of software engineers from them for a month or so, they could write something up just great for Photoshop). So I dd not upgrade Photoshop.

     

    I can get the full version of CS 5 Extended for just south of $300 if I do a search for the software. Upgrade pricing is right around $150 consistently if you are one level down. I would have spent $300 had I upgraded to CS4 and then CS5 and, if I upgraded before any discounts were available, I would have spent more than $300. Assuming I could get CS6 (which is, at this writing not released), my price would, if I was doing the upgrade mill routine be $450 to keep the current version of Photoshop. Certainly, within six months of its release, I would be able to buy a full version of Photoshop CS6 for around $300, saving $150 in the process.

     

    Here is the lesson: Buy what you need and don't be controlled by external influences.

     

    Adobe would love for everyone to pay them continually to keep developing their software. Development is expensive—everyone knows that. So Adobe is going to set pricing and everything else to maximize returns. Assume that.

     

    Here is what you get (assuming you are in business in the United States) if you upgrade every cycle:

     

    • You may be able to get a regular tax deduction for the business investment. So you may reduce your taxes by upgrading. Adobe gets the money and Uncle Sam gets less.
    • You get a cheaper upgrade price, but we have all ready seen that it may not be cheaper if you hang on to what you have for a little longer and buy the full version every three versions.
    • You get to use the new tools (if Adobe does put new tools into the software—and many times they don't).

     

    Here is what you get if you don't upgrade every cycle:

     

    • No tax deduction—but no outlay for the upgrade, either.
    • Software that you know, which means you do not have to adapt your workflow.
    • If you wait for three upgrades, there is a substantial savings if you buy full versions instead of upgrade versions.
    • No need to upgrade your computer because the new software doesn't run on your older hardware.

     

    So take your pick and make smart business decisions that work for you and are not influenced by any other company. And realize that, unless someone is holding a gun to your head, nobody is forcing you to do anything.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 8:41 AM   in reply to SnakEyez02

    http://eduardoangel.com/2012/01/13/adobe-reconsiders-upgrade-policy-ex piration/

     

    Adobe’s world­wide upgrade pol­icy was set to change after Decem­ber 31, 2011. Well, now they are announc­ing a new “spe­cial upgrade offer” for CS3 and CS4 customers.

     

    Adobe-Creative-Suite-5-590x195.jpg

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 10:26 AM   in reply to mhollis55

     

    Paul, nobody held a gun to your head and forced you to upgrade. Let's be rational here.

     


    They most certainly held a virtual gun when they told me outright that" if i wanted to upgrade to CS6 or future version of Photoshop, i had to buy cs5!" That is the equivalent of a "virtual: gun in my opinion. How can you say it is not? It's a do this or you can't do that situation is it not? then for them to say oh, never mind you don't have to buy this, to upgrade to that, which was them LYING to the customers.

     

    I also don't believe they did this because of the customer backlash to the policy. They had to have something like this planned ahead of time.  If you were not forced to buy a product that one , you didn't want, 2nd still doesn't work on my machine, and third -you can't get ANY customer service to help you with the program working correctly or getting credit towards CS6, then you really don't have a leg to stand on. Talk to me when you spend hours on the phone trying to get a program to work that you were forced to buy.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 10:36 AM   in reply to paul campagna

    OK, here is what you just did, Paul. You read the first part of my statement, got angry and replied.

     

    Read the second part of my statement. That would be the part about saving money if you do not upgrade and, instead, buy new copies of the software outright.

     

    You seem to think that you have to upgrade for some reason or another. If it does not make any business sense, if the improvements in the Adobe applications (or anyone's applications, for that matter) don't suit you, are incremental, aren't enough to upgrade, etc., ignore the policy statements that suggest an upgrade is "necessary" because of some corporate policy. All corporate policies are subject to change.

     

    Here is what happened:

     

    • Adobe releases a statement that says people will have no upgrade path if their software is too old.
    • Everyone starts looking for alternatives.
    • The magazines publish reviews for some of the alternatives because there is a certain amount of pressure for them to do so (usually generated by the initial statement).
    • Adobe thought better of the policy and changed it.

     

    You thought you were trapped, somehow, when you actually were not.

     

    You feel mishandled by Adobe.

     

    Hopefully, you have learned a good business lesson.

     

    Life goes on.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 10:37 AM   in reply to macuser88

    macuser88 wrote:

     

    Adobe’s world­wide upgrade policy was set to change after Decem­ber 31, 2011.

     

     

     

    That's not correct -- their upgrade policy was not set to change on December 31, 2011 - the policy would change only when CS6 comes out, for upgrades at that time.

     

    Adobe would have no way of definitively knowing when a customer purchased or upgraded to Creative Suite 5.5, so there could be no earlier cutoff.

     

    The only thing that was set to expire on 12/31/2011 was the additional 20% discount on upgrades to CS5.5 - but towards the end of December that offer was extended.

     

    The difference now is that owning CS5 or CS5.5 is no longer a requirement to get future upgrade pricing to CS6, at least though the end of 2012.

     

    So that December 31, 2011 date was a misunderstanding on significance, but to be fair, Adobe's communication on the issue was sparse and complex enough to be misread.

     

    

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 10:55 AM   in reply to mhollis55

    mhollis55 wrote:

     

    OK, here is what you just did, Paul. You read the first part of my statement, got angry and replied.

     

    I read your whole statement, but apparently you think that it is ok for a company to lie to you to get you to buy a product. You do not need to know details on why I am planning to buy CS6, that is none of your business. Please don't preach to me about anything else.   I was lied to about having to buy something I never actually needed to buy and now they are not doing their job to offer me customer service for a product they sold me that doesn't work and was not what I wanted in the first place.

     

    AGAIN, unless you spent money on something you didn't need, then I really see no need to comment on something you don't understand.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 11:02 AM   in reply to paul campagna

    I'm STILL waiting for Adobe to call me back after weeks of trying. HELLO ADOBE????

     

    I've filled out several call back request with no "call back". On Twitter with "Bing" and she didn't have all the information she needed to give me the correct answer, what do I have to do to get a response from adobe?

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 11:06 AM   in reply to paul campagna

    Buy my product, Paul. It will prevent hair loss, remove loose teeth and cause you to have increased vitality. If you buy my product, you will live 135 years.

     

    There, now I have lied to you.

     

    Does it change any decisions you are going to make?

     

    Seriously, I understand you feel tricked. So claim the purchase on your tax return and move on.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 11:15 AM   in reply to mhollis55

    mhollis55 wrote:

     

    Buy my product, Paul. It will prevent hair loss, remove loose teeth and cause you to have increased vitality. If you buy my product, you will live 135 years.

     

    There, now I have lied to you.

     

    Does it change any decisions you are going to make?

     

    Seriously, I understand you feel tricked. So claim the purchase on your tax return and move on.

    Because Tax writeoffs make everything ok, ..... I honestly don't know why you feel the need to waste my time with nonsense. - please troll elsewhere.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 11:27 AM   in reply to paul campagna

    Only the company didn't lie - they just changed the policy.  I can assure you the original policy was in the works for while before ultimately changing in response to customer feedback, there was no "bait and switch."  Most people are happy they made the policy better, but the change didn't happen faster because it all took place in real-time and big companies move more slowly.

     

    Paul, this is a user-to-user forum...  You won't receive a response from Adobe here.  People have offered suggestions to you here and on other threads, but we can't help or do anything further for you.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 12:03 PM   in reply to ProDesignTools

    Most people are happy they made the policy better,

     

    Most of the online comments I've seen related to the "better policy" are focussed on the extraordinarily poor timing of the change and the fact that they feel duped into the CS5.5 upgrade.

     

    Must say, it feels like a major misstep by Adobe and suggests that they're losing touch with user sentiment in some areas like this.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 12:05 PM   in reply to ProDesignTools

    I'm ******** on here so people who search can hear how many problems are going on with Adobe and their horrible customer service. People need to know how they treat their customers and hopefully adobe hears it and changes. Results show up in google, so if one person find this thread an avoids the problems i having then that is why i'm here. It is adobes forum yes?

     

    After Months they are finally issuing a credit! After a month and 18 days they say they are crediting my account! Holly crap what a horrible experience! 

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 12:51 PM   in reply to John Waller

    John Waller wrote:

     

    Most people are happy they made the policy better,

     

    Most of the online comments I've seen related to the "better policy" are focussed on the extraordinarily poor timing of the change and the fact that they feel duped into the CS5.5 upgrade.

     

    Must say, it feels like a major misstep by Adobe and suggests that they're losing touch with user sentiment in some areas like this.

    This is one of my major points. If they want people (me) to believe that they didn't have this in place already, then they should've let people know (who bought the product because they were specifically told by Adobe they had to buy it or they would pay full price) that the policy has changed and offer special pricing, or a coupon or SOMETHING/ ANYTHING.  I found out by reading the news aboutt he change and I was PIIIIISSSSSEEEED. Then after calling adobe more than once to complain with no solution, no case opened, nothing, it lead me to complain everywhere!  How many people that thought they had to buy CS5, or bought it and haven't found out yet they didn't need to buy it? How many companies that used year end $, or only had one shot to upgrade until next year now find out about it and can't do anything? Sure they will refund, but Let me tell you that procedure is not easy to go through when Adobe ignores you for over a month.  I believe it's on purpose thinkg you will eventually give up.

     

    This has been a major headache for me and with no compenasation offered for the people who did unwillingly buy a product they didn't want. It's a kick in the (you know what)

     

    The only thing Adobe had to do was send an email to people who bought CS5.5 and say "sorry here is a complimentary price on upgrading to cs6" SOMETHING! it could've been some made up number, but at the least it would've let peole know that Adobe carred about it's customers. Then for those who bought something they never wanted to buy, they woul've felt like the got compensation of some kind.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 1:12 PM   in reply to paul campagna

    paul campagna wrote:

     

    Adobe has yet to understand my concerns with CS5 photoshop not working correctly.

     

    It is unlikely Adobe can understand what the heck has this got to do with Dreamweaver forum?  You first tried to post your rant on Forum Comments and iyour post was closed down by the mederator.  Now you have started here.

     

    What exactly is your problem?  Why don't you understand that these forums are not meant for such things.  If you have any problems with Dreeamweaver then please start a new post stating precisely what the problem is.

     

    Photoshop forums is at this link:

     

    <http://forums.adobe.com/community/photoshop/general>

     

    Good luck.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 1:16 PM   in reply to paul campagna

    The only thing Adobe had to do was send an email to people who bought CS5.5 and say "sorry here is a complimentary price on upgrading to cs6" SOMETHING! it could've been some made up number, but at the least it would've let peole know that Adobe carred about it's customers. Then for those who bought something they never wanted to buy, they woul've felt like the got compensation of some kind.

     

    That already exists for suites.

     

    Under their current upgrade pricing policy, Adobe offers tiered upgrade pricing.

     

    CS2, CS3 and CS4 users pay more for upgrading to CS5.5 than CS5 users.

     

    So those who feel duped into upgrading to CS5.5 should at least get a price break for upgrading to CS6.

     

    Cold comfort though.

     

    Upgrade pricing will probably be tiered until the "3-versions-back" policy becomes the "upgrade-from-current-version-only" policy on 31 Dec 2012.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2012 1:41 PM   in reply to mytaxsite.co.uk

    I understand completly why these forum are here. They are all linked to adobe. If it helps someone else with this problem when they search, then that is what my goal is by complaining on here. I want other people to see it.  wheni do a search for problems such as this, guess what shows up first in the listings? I know how search engines work.

     

    I'm done now after three hours on the phone today, i finally got the refund confirmation email. Hopefully it goes through without a problem, but it took WAY TO LONG for adobe to recognize my issue and take care of it. four cases opened, two closed without any kind of resolution, one that they told me they opend that never was, and now i finally got through.

     

    How can a company that acts like this stay in business?

     

    Enough about that now. but people reading thins from search, you are not alone in hating adobe.

     

    peace out.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 20, 2012 1:19 AM   in reply to paul campagna

    I agree with you, Paul. I also upgraded to CS5.5 because of Adobe 'virtual gun' that I would not be able to upgrade to CS6 from CS4. So I feel very cheated.

    I contacted Adobe by Twitter (@Adobe_care) and a guy named Rohit Kumar DM'ed me that I was offered a free copy of Lightroom 3 (which I already own and is almost replaced by LR4) or to return my CS5.5 if bought directly form Adobe (which I did not.. I bought it through a Dutch reseller). I offered them to give me a free upgrade from LR3 to LR4 but haven't heard from then since then (which was almost one week ago).

     
    |
    Mark as:
1 2 Previous Next
Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)