Skip navigation
corriela
Currently Being Moderated

Snapping is a nightmare

Mar 21, 2012 11:01 AM

Forgive me if there is a thread about this already, I looked and couldn't find one.

 

I'm having real problems with my snapping. When I drag an item up to snap to another one it appears to snap onto it. but when I zoom in it's always a fraction off.

If I then try to type the exact x/y value into the Transform palette e.g. x:100 y:100 it then resets itself to something like x: 100.002 y: 100.16 WHY???

I DON'T have align to pixel grid on.

 

I use Illustrator for detailed precise artworks which then get output to machinery for product design and label cutting so I need it to be accurate. Other forums on the web show other people having the same issue so what's up??

 

Is this an Illustrator bug or something I'm doing wrong?

 

Thanks

Using CS5.5

 
Replies
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 21, 2012 11:24 AM   in reply to corriela

    What exactly are you doing?

     

    How are you grabbing that object? Are you using smart guides? Which options? Which other snapping options are you using? Does the object have strokes? Effects?

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 22, 2012 11:47 AM   in reply to corriela

    In general, AI's snapping behaviour is a well-known case of unreliability. Even assisted by smart guides it doesn't work consistently.

     

    In the past some AI advocates sometimes argued for that behaviour because, after all, AI is supposed to be an "Illustration" programme, not a Cad application.

     

    Well ...

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 24, 2012 5:13 AM   in reply to corriela

    I understand the 'Illustration' vs 'CAD' argument

    Don't buy into the ridiculous defensive sour-grapes reasoning of software devotees. There is no reason why one should not expect snap behaviors to be reliable at all zooms. Other mainstream general purpose vector drawing programs can pull off reliable object snapping. Just because this antequated dog can't doesn't make it justifiable.

     

    JET

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 24, 2012 3:40 PM   in reply to corriela

    To underline, only some obedient AI advocates used that remarkable 'Illustration' vs 'CAD' argument.

     

    I cannot recommend it.

     
    |
    Mark as:

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Answers + Points = Status

  • 10 points awarded for Correct Answers
  • 5 points awarded for Helpful Answers
  • 10,000+ points
  • 1,001-10,000 points
  • 501-1,000 points
  • 5-500 points