Skip navigation

Dreamweaver

Currently Being Moderated

HTML tags

Apr 11, 2012 2:08 PM

Tags: #tags #html #open #graph #itemscope

Hi I am wondering how to include FB, GOOGLE etc stuff into my html tags. Below is an idea of what I need. I don't know how to configure it? Any reply would be appreciated!

Also, is it the same in HTML 5?

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

<head>

732 Views 3 Replies Latest reply: KevinSFreeman, Apr 12, 2012 3:02 PM

Replies

Currently Being Moderated

1. Brad Lawryk,

Apr 11, 2012 2:20 PM in reply to KevinSFreeman

Report

Hi Kevin,

Information on including Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc can all be found in the developer sections of those sites.

|
Mark as:
Currently Being Moderated

2. adninjastrator,

Apr 11, 2012 8:52 PM in reply to KevinSFreeman

Report

is it the same in HTML 5
is not the same as

......XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN......
more about DOCTYPE declaration:
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_doctype.asp
As mentioned, check with their developer sections for specifics.
Best wishes,
Adninjastrator

|
Mark as:
Currently Being Moderated

3. KevinSFreeman,

Apr 12, 2012 3:02 PM in reply to KevinSFreeman

Report

Thanks for your suggestions.

I have checked the google and fb developers sections and read the w3schools.com/tags/tag_doctype.asp

Regretably I don't understand the sytax involved here and this hasn't been covered on FB or Google that I can see. I am trying to place the required code into an html tag. Here is what I get from google...


<html itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/">

My existing page html tag looks like this...
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml>

I do not know if I do ....
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/" > with this option I get a validation error saying itemscope is not valid.

Or if I replce the <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml> with <html itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/">

Or if I am completly wrong and there is another method?

Thanks for any help

|
Mark as: