Whenever I use a dip to white, the video that it dips from nudges downwards a few pixels, then nudges back up when the transition comlpetes. It's slight but very noticable. THis is 1280x720 footage in a 4:3 timeline (for broadcast on a local network). THis happens in the preview and in the finished product. Would love to find an answer to this one.
5.5.2 contains 0 updates to anything related to my issue according to the changelog. So I don't want to or see a need to update to something that fixes things that don't concern my system or anything I do.
If the final product is going to be 480, should I not be using a 4:3 sequence?
While I agree the processor isnt the greatest in terms of Adobe performance, I don't see why it would have anything to do with how a simple transition is rendered.
There are a lot of under-the-hood updates/bug corrections in 5.5.2 that may not be explicitly mentioned in the changelog.
1280 x 720 with square PAR is 16 x 9. It has nothing to do with your export format.
The meager CPU may cause problems, especially if your disk setup or memory is lacking as well.
Have you tried flipping your H264 file to something else. It might just be me, but I think of H264 as a transitional codec. Its so highly compressed it can cause problems in NLE's across the board.
No, I never took into account. Basically the people doing the filming are doing stringouts and then exporting them out as h.264 so i can then edit. Is there a better codec they should be exporting to for delivery to me?
1280 x 720 with square PAR is 16 x 9. It has nothing to do with your export format.
Ah I was udner the impression i should be editing in a sequence supporting the settings I'm going to be exporting out to =\. Didn't realize exporting takes care of all of that. Sigh. Oh well one more kink ironed out in the learning process.
1280 x 720 with square PAR is 16 x 9. It has nothing to do with your export format.
Also to go back on this.. i just realized that if I edit in a 16:9 sequence when the intended output will be SD, then there's no way for me to edit the film properly taking into consideration framing and title safe areas.
Check the delivery specs from the broadcaster.
Even though it may be an SD (4:3) broadcast...it may be from Full Height Anamorphic media (FHA).
These are produced from 16:9 files.
Would you care to explain how that sort of workflow would go? Let me give you a bit of detail on how my entire workflow is going here and maybe you can point me to the roadbumps that could be smoothed out. The people doing the filming are doing the rough edits then giving that to me to edit. I don't know what type of camera or media they are shooting with, i have only been looking at the properties of the footage I get (h.264/Quicktime 1.0 PAR). Now then the other thing I'd like to know is how if I'm editing in a 16:9 sequence I can see 4:3 output int he program panel so I know wheremy margins are. Sorry if these seem like really stupid questions but hence the user name ![]()
The people doing the filming are doing the rough edits then giving that to me to edit.
If they're using PP for the rough cut, have them give you the original media along with the PP project file. Then you can open that rough cut project and do the finishing.
If they're using Final Cut Pro or Avid, there are ways to open those projects in PP as well.
You won't need to worry about that. 16:9 export out as 4:3 will be letterboxed. Everything will still show.
Major aha moment. See I'm a good "editor" when it comes to piecing together a story, but I am still a bit confused with the whole technical side of exports and codecs and such, so this just added another piece to the puzzle. Just tried the dips to white in this sequence and they work like a charm!
Thanks Harm and Jim!
Shooternz, would still like to hear about your opinion on the workfloe from them to me though.
If they're using PP for the rough cut, have them give you the original media along with the PP project file. Then you can open that rough cut project and do the finishing.
If they're using Final Cut Pro or Avid, there are ways to open those projects in PP as well.
Jim, they are actually using imovie which has no export to xml that PP is capable of reading.. The only thing I havelearned of is the possibility of exporting it to FCP then exporting that out to an XML readable my PP.
Would you care to explain how that sort of workflow would go? Let me give you a bit of detail on how my entire workflow is going here and maybe you can point me to the roadbumps that could be smoothed out. The people doing the filming are doing the rough edits then giving that to me to edit. I don't know what type of camera or media they are shooting with, i have only been looking at the properties of the footage I get (h.264/Quicktime 1.0 PAR). Now then the other thing I'd like to know is how if I'm editing in a 16:9 sequence I can see 4:3 output int he program panel so I know wheremy margins are.
O.K....Roadbumps from what I can see are:
1. You dont know the broadcast delivery spec. Thats essential to know.
2. The people filming are doing "rough edits" and then you are taking over. Complicated and messy workflow IMHO
Are you working with the original media?
You can drop 16:9 footage into an SD sequence if you choose but you will have to accept bars top and bottom or centre extraction composition....as well as down rezzing in Premiere. Of course that makes it easy to use the Safe areas.
If they want SD FHA you work with an HD sequence and you output to tape or file squeezed.
Different broadcasters have different specs.
They may simply want SD. You need to ask as that determines how you proceed from here.
They may simply want SD. You need to ask as that determines how you proceed from here.
Hey Shooter, sorry I wasnt clear, but I do know their delivery spec, they just want a pop in and play DVD in SD, made in Encore or the like.
As for "original media" well i am just working with the exports they give me of the stringouts (Quicktime/h.264)
DVD delivery is a pretty basic BC spec so I would work in an SD sequence for that.
The viewers with 16:9 TVs will have to suffer pillar box bars left and right.
Your option is to edit in HD and allow Encore to downrez to SD ...but you would have to ask the BC if that works for them and the veiwers.
I have actually already done something for them in the past that worked fine at the station. It was also HD footage and I worked in a 4:3 sequence. Thats why i was confused with the tips in this thread telling me to use an HD seq. and then export out as SD (which like i stated above, i tried out and did an export and the bars come on top and bottom.. not pillars like you mentioned.. But what youre saying I believe is that if that export was shown on a widescreen TV then theyw ill see pillars AND top and bottom bars?)
But the dips to white are working properly in the 16:9 sequence which was after all the main focus of this post (all these other tips are bonuses though).
Hmm..
So.. if i edit in HD seq like you suggest then let Encore so the downsizing... Well when i export out of Premiere, then do i export as mpeg2? Because if I do that, i get top/bottom bars...
hey Jim, I know that will never happen, he cannot afford the $$ to have me sort through the hours (many) of raw footage to find what to best use to piece together, plus the person is very artsy/creative and particular about what stuff will even be in the initial batch of footage to possibly make it to the final cut. Also might you have anything to add to my question to Shooter a few posts up?
North America
Europe, Middle East and Africa
Asia Pacific