Skip navigation

EM-5 Support:  Adobe, this time you are late !!

Apr 23, 2012 11:43 AM

Tags: #olympus #omd #em-5
  Latest reply: Keith_Reeder, Apr 26, 2012 2:29 PM
Replies 1 2 Previous Next
  • Cocuted
    Currently Being Moderated
    40. Cocuted,
    Apr 26, 2012 4:41 AM   in reply to Cocuted
    Report

    Adobe Camera RAW 6.7 beta support E-M5 has long, this is evidence:

    http://i.imgur.com/GbI6I.jpg

    See here:

    http://www.dpreview.com/previews/olympusem5/7

     

    i think Adobe Camera RAW 6.7 FINAL coming soon and everyone is happy.


     
    |
    Mark as:
  • tgutgu
    Currently Being Moderated
    41. tgutgu,
    Apr 26, 2012 5:39 AM   in reply to Cocuted
    Report

    This is the very reason I ask for another RC. The EM-5 profile is obviously ready. So why do they make a RC with 5DMKIII support but not with EM-5? Seems very arbitrary to me. If the profiles are there, just release them in a RC, if only that EM-5 users can give their feedback. Again, too much to ask the market leader for?

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Michael_Flynn
    Currently Being Moderated
    42. Michael_Flynn,
    Apr 26, 2012 12:33 PM   in reply to tgutgu
    Report

    RC2 is out and it looks like the support has been added

     

    I successfully imported my OMD .orf files into it.  Made my day WOOHOO

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Rikk Flohr
    Currently Being Moderated
    43. Rikk Flohr,
    Apr 26, 2012 12:36 PM   in reply to tgutgu
    Report

    You got your wish!

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • tgutgu
    Currently Being Moderated
    44. tgutgu,
    Apr 26, 2012 1:42 PM   in reply to Rikk Flohr
    Report

    Wow, great, a lot of thanks Adobe. I don't know, if my posts had any influence that Adobe decided for another RC with the requested camera support. However, it proves my pledge right: if the functional code is ot ready for final release, make your customers happy with new camera support in release candidates. This policy makes everyone happy, the early adopters of new cameras and the development team, which needs time to fix some outstanding issues.

     

    Again, thanks a lot.

     

    Kind regards

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Jeff Schewe
    Currently Being Moderated
    45. Jeff Schewe,
    Apr 26, 2012 1:56 PM   in reply to tgutgu
    Report

    tgutgu wrote:

     

    I don't know, if my posts had any influence that Adobe decided for another RC with the requested camera support.

     

    No, it didn't...this has been in the pipeline for a while. Software doesn't just turn on a dime ya know...it takes a LOT of man hours. Your OP on the 23rd of April was just a drop in the bucket in terms of engineering time it takes.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • tgutgu
    Currently Being Moderated
    46. tgutgu,
    Apr 26, 2012 2:06 PM   in reply to Jeff Schewe
    Report

    I did not really expected that it did, and after I learned that RC2 has some additional features, such as new defringing tools, my post certainly had nothing to do with it. However, RC2 supports my pledge not to wait with new camera support until final release.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • CatOne2
    Currently Being Moderated
    47. CatOne2,
    Apr 26, 2012 2:28 PM   in reply to Jeff Schewe
    Report

    C'mon, Jeff.  You could just say "it helped" even if it's not totally true ;-)

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Keith_Reeder
    Currently Being Moderated
    48. Keith_Reeder,
    Apr 26, 2012 2:29 PM   in reply to CatOne2
    Report

    CatOne2 wrote:

     

    C'mon, Jeff.  You could just say "it helped" even if it's not totally true ;-)

     

    Pretty good reason not to say it, really...

     
    |
    Mark as:
1 2 Previous Next
Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)