I agree...there was an old Adobe Photoshop site (and a separate one for Illustrator) to which I made many suggestions and many/most were eventually implemented and I assume there were many similar requests.

BUT, perhaps 6 month or a year ago Adobe changed the imput method/web site and now it is a complete waste of time and trouble...so I no longer provide suggestions there.

If I thought this forum got the same results I might resume with my ideas but since there is a "formal" (tho now terrible) process, why would I expect Adobe to watch/listen to ideas here?  (or did that site die too?)

If I'm wrong....then here is my most current suggestion: resurrect the old Photoshop web site for submitting ideas for improving Photoshop . . . it was neat, clean, clear, obvious, and easy to use.

or at least make a "sticky" post here or else there may be a flood of duplicates or a widespread mess of ideas rather than a string of connected ideas that Adobe can make better use of.

station_two wrote:

 

If I were Adobe's legal counsel, I would advise them never to acknowledge such a feature request.

 

Unfortunately, we live in a world full of people waiting for the chance to sue for damages, claiming they were the originators of an idea or improvement used by a corporation.

Spoken like a g** d*** lawyer.

It'll be a sad day when businesses stop listening to their clientele by the advice of thier lawyers. Remember the quote: "If you don't take care of your clients, someone else will"

You miss the point 100%, gumbogood.

I never said "businesses stop listening to their clientele" nor did I imply that was the case.  Adobe does listen and implements features requests from time to time.  I was just addressing their not acknowledging such feature requests.  That's different from not taking them into consideration.