Skip navigation
Chris Outwin
Currently Being Moderated

Resolution & Photoshop

Jun 20, 2012 5:54 PM

I am a Photoshop newbie working on graphics for an iPad 3 (2048 x 1536) 264 ppi application. Would someone please suggest whether I should buy an iMac 27" (2560 x 1400) 102 ppi or a Macbook Pro 15" Retina (2880  x 1800) 220 ppi computer?  My hope is to minimize the need to scroll or zoom the image while drawing.  I'm aware that Photoshop doesn't currently support Retina resolution.  Thank you.

 
Replies
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jun 20, 2012 9:06 PM   in reply to Chris Outwin

    Hi Chris

     

    Welcome to the board! Funnily enough I've just got an iPad3 myself, and one of its main uses is as a "digital portfolio" for my photography, which is quite different to what you're doing I know.

     

    However, my system monitor is a 24" HP ZR2440w, which is 1920 x 1200, obviously quite a bit smaller than the iPad. So yes, once I process, or reprocess my files for the iPad, and view them at 100%, I have to scroll around, but for me that's no big deal as I start with Raw files that are 5184 x 3456, and am used to scrolling!

     

    As spectacular as the Retina display on the MacBook Pro is, you're still only working on a 15" screen, and that's something I personally could not do; if I were in your position I'd buy the iMac and put up with a little scrolling. Of course you might want to wait 'til later in the year as the Apple Rumor Mill  is winding itself up into a foaming mouthed frenzy over the idea of an iMac with a Retina display!!!

     

    Good luck

    Paul

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Noel Carboni
    20,984 posts
    Dec 23, 2006
    Currently Being Moderated
    Jun 20, 2012 9:13 PM   in reply to pf22

    What gets me to drooling is what the penultimate evolution of these 200+ ppi displays could become...  Image a 30 incher with enough pixels to show your 18 megapixel images in their entirety at 100% zoom.

     

    Just so as not to be completely unhelpful, I agree with Paul above...  I don't think there's a substitute for square inches, since you can only make things so small before they become unusable.  I have Photoshop plastered across a 3200 x 1200 pixel desktop that runs across a pair of 20" monitors myself, and I don't have spare space.

     

    -Noel

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jun 21, 2012 9:48 PM   in reply to Chris Outwin

    Paul makes a good point. To have the extra pixel resolution it is better to have a larger monitor, as the higher the resolution is the smaller the objects on the monitor are. If its too high and you have a small screen, then you will have a hard time seeing what your looking at.

     

    But I see Noel's point as well, it would be nice to look at a full screen image in all its glory that it was meant to be.

     
    |
    Mark as:

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Answers + Points = Status

  • 10 points awarded for Correct Answers
  • 5 points awarded for Helpful Answers
  • 10,000+ points
  • 1,001-10,000 points
  • 501-1,000 points
  • 5-500 points