Skip navigation
ShacharOren
Currently Being Moderated

upgrading LR3 cat to LR4 catalog

Jun 29, 2012 10:00 AM

hello,

 

i have just installed LR4 on my win7 system.

 

i still have the LR3 installed and operational.

 

i am looking for the smartest way to move all my stuff into LR4 and keeping as much details and info from my LR3 catalog.

 

 

i have tried just openning the LR3 catalog from LR4 and it works and on first glance it looks ok,

 

but i understood that this is not the best way for keeping all info.

 

 

tnx ,

 

 

shachar oren.

 
Replies
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jun 29, 2012 10:27 AM   in reply to ShacharOren

    I'm not sure what your getting at here. Did you loose anything in your catalog going from LR3 to LR4? You shouldn't have. I'm not sure what other methods have been suggested by others, but it sounds like it could be convoluted with no gain.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jun 29, 2012 10:37 AM   in reply to ShacharOren

    You can have Lr3 and Lr4 on your system, and both will work - but not simultaneously, i.e. you can open either Lr3 or Lr4. not both at the same time.

    Lr4 upgrades the Lr3 catalog to the effect that Lr3 cannot open or work with the upgraded new Lr4 catalog.

    But if the upgraded Lr4 catalog has been saved under a new name and the old Lr3 catalog is still unchanged, you can use it to work in Lr3.

     

    But it is best to use Lr3 only to check things out, not to do actual work. If you did your Lr3 catalog and your Lr4 catalog would diverge. This is not useful.

    And it would be cumbersome to bring work that you did in Lr3 into Lr4 after the Lr4 catalog has been created.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jun 29, 2012 6:27 PM   in reply to ShacharOren

    ShacharOren wrote:

     

    i have tried just openning the LR3 catalog from LR4 and it works and on first glance it looks ok,

     

    but i understood that this is not the best way for keeping all info.

     

    You understood wrong - this *is* the best way for keeping all info.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jun 30, 2012 12:04 PM   in reply to ShacharOren

    Just make sure that you are using the LR 4.1 update when converting your old LR3 catalog! LR 4.0 has a bug: It will not correctly convert your tone curves.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 1, 2012 1:56 AM   in reply to ShacharOren

    Rob Cole has told you the best version to use, which you have!

     

    He actually does know quite a fair bit on the workings of Lightroom by the way!

     

    Don't 'overegg' the pudding as my gran used to say.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 1, 2012 2:11 AM   in reply to Gerry A White

    Hi Gerry,

     

    I'm wondering now whether what we think happened is really what happened.

     

    I mean, if I remember correctly, when you first open an Lr3 catalog with Lr4, it explains that it's gonna convert the format and make a new copy... - doesn't it?

     

    ShacharOren - you're Lr3 catalog should still be intact and unaltered, and it should have been converted to Lr4 format - in a new folder. *all* the stuff from Lr3 should be there in the new converted catalog.

     

    Does this not sound right?

     

    Rob

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 1, 2012 5:32 AM   in reply to Rob Cole

    Hi Rob

     

    Yes that's how it worked for me too. The catalog converted changing the preview folders title to match the new calatog, leaving the old catalog where it was and adding - 2 to the new catalog and previews data names.

     

    The previous catalog is still how it was prior to the change!

     

    Gerry

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 1, 2012 12:20 PM   in reply to ShacharOren

    ShacharOren wrote:

     

    ...add this to what i have heard about "just" openning a LR3 cat in LR4 and there you have it, PANIC.

     

    The only issue of data loss, that I know of, when converting an older catalog to a newer format, was due to a bug in Lr4.0 (loss of point curve). But you used Lr4.1, so there should be *no* data loss.

     

    All good?

     
    |
    Mark as:

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Answers + Points = Status

  • 10 points awarded for Correct Answers
  • 5 points awarded for Helpful Answers
  • 10,000+ points
  • 1,001-10,000 points
  • 501-1,000 points
  • 5-500 points