@mattcom - I also would be very interested in this, if it can be done. Although I have a strong background in IT, I am pretty much a novice when it comes to setting up/managing servers, let alone something like this. I was reading the BBB FAQ page and they recommended having a dedicated server with quad core X3450 cpu and 4GB memory. And, they also "recommend that you use BBB for on line classes totaling twenty five (25) users or less. This may be one class of 25 users, 2 x 12, 5 x 5, etc." Well, that solution is unworkable!
@BarryC16 - I agree that rebuilding the components could be a formidable task, but what other option do we have. I only need the basic components (video chat, whiteboard, notes), so if these can be ported over to to work on another server/backend without too much difficulty then why not? Again, the alternatives are either lacking in functionality, or they cost too much.
I have looked at TokBox and it seems like a great tool for video chat - lot's of documentation, a good API, and several libraries. However, it's far from a comprehensive solution.
I'm just hoping that Jeff and the Adobe management come back with something that will help ease our worries.
@phaseblue - I understand your point. Each of are using different subsets of LCCS that are unavailable anywhere else and we have built businesses on the belief that this platform would be around long enough for those businesses to mature to the point where we could invest in building those components ourselves. Our best hope is that Adobe helps us by extending the shutdown date by at least an extra year. In your case, just like mine... the XMPP layer of LCCS is vital for these collaborative components. Tokbox do not have that yet, but they are looking into adding at least the basic messagin layer. Whiteboarding is a little bit more complex.
Personally, I am going to wait to see what Adobe comes up with and then try to build my own messaging system on top of Red5 and also see what Tokbox provides over the next few months. My gut feeling is that Adobe will do something once they realize that the announced shutdown date will mean quite a few of us being put out of business.
great to find you here.
Your tool is built upon wowza I think?
It's great, but I think you really do not need
Why did you stop AIR for mobile ability?
If you would provide text chat, whiteboard, screen sharing and real event handling opentok would be an alternative.
Also providing flex components or just shared managers, shared model components would be great for the beginning.
As you see, you are far away from LCCS or our point of view, but I trust in you going this way :-)
When I say transition I mean that LCCS won't continue in it's current form as an Adobe hosted services. I'll do my best to preserve as much functionality as possible. The discussions in this forum are helping me understand what's valuable to you.
Thank you for your efforts. I'm adding one more vote to keep the screen sharing functionality.
Maybe just add a parameter where users can specify / point to their own FMS server... Wouldn't even need to open source the component or anything like that. Only make the server side code available, if any.
It would be even better if the screen share dialog was completely generic or customizable.
Hi LCSS Lives,
With AIR for mobile we just weren't getting the performance we needed from this platform, didn't see this as a prioritiy for Adobe, and are now focused on better solutions for mobile.
Have you noticed our new iOS SDK - launched just last week!
On the logo treatment, are you referring to the very small icon that appears in the rollover state?
Your mail said that a 1000$ free usage was granted, and no PPU account will be charged, but what happens if our business get an usage above 1000$ ?
About the 3 solutions proposed:
The $1000/month limit was chosen based on historical usage and we determined it to be a safe level for all with room to grow. If an increase is required we can do that but all indicators are that it won't be. I think you have nicely enumerated the options we have to consider right now. However, I can't offer up any code that someone else has built on top of FMS. That's really up to them. Another hosting provider or Open Source are the possible options. I don't have much to report on these right now, but I'll provide an update when i do.
hi Jeff, thanks a lot for answering.
Its more clear about 1000$ limit for me now
But what exactly is the amount of work to clean up the server side code? Can anyone else than Adobe help to do the clean up? Is Adobe evaluating this possibility to clean up the server side code to get LCCS work in stand alone or is it out of the scope?
I would also be very interested to get a working solution hosted in amazon Web Services FMS instances, as it is highly scalable.
Last question, which i understand is difficult for you, but would you have a previous time scale of when we can expect a more clear idea of what can be done and what can't?
You can understand that if it takes 6 month, we cant wait and be stuck with only 3 month to find another solution.
@BarryC16, I completely agree with you. I do believe that Jeff is trying to find a solution that is in all of our best interests and we should just wait and see what they come up with.
@Sebpatu2000 I had previously written Jeff an email and described exactly what you said in point 3 of your solutions. Adobe could charge influxis.com a small licensing fee for the LCCS backend code. It would be a win-win for all parties involved.
@ Jeff Stanier
It has been over month, any news on the LCCS service shutdown and viable alternatives? My company is in the same situation as everyone else that built a product around LCCS, it is no small task to re-write these parts for any new LCCS solution. Our company just found out recently of the news so we have had a late start on trying to switch to an alternate solution. We need a viable solution for us and have little or no impact on our customer base, what is Adobe doing to help in this matter? I can tell you for a fact if a viable solution is not found, this will have a huge impact on public relations of adobe. No company will want to ever do any business with a company that abandons its customers like the way Adobe has abandoned us. If it does not get resolved reasonably and to our satisfaction I can assure you Adobe will be in court for the next 3 years and I will never again base any software product on their technology or tools ever again! Adobe actions in this matter is unprecedented and shameful!
You beat me to it. I was going to post an update today since I had a couple of inquiries about the status of things. I don't have much to report at this point other than discussions are ongoing and taking longer than I expected. I still think however that we'll be able to come to an agreement with a hosting partner to take over the service. I will provide more info as soon as I can but it would be premature to do so at this point,
Thanks for you continued patience.
thank you for the response. I hope Adobe will be more tranparent in this matter. Time is very important and there is going to be a point of no return on this issue. You have people either waiting on Adobe to provide an alternative host before the December deadline or you have others trying to re-write parts of their product. So Adobe needs to be very open in this process and let us know a timeline when an alternative hosting provide can be available for us to access or if not at all.
The reason why:
1. So people can not waiste development time re-writing code and focus on only the changes needed for using the alternate hosting provider and still work on enhancements to their product.
2. if a hosting provider will not be in time of the deadline, adobe should extend the deadline.
3. if hosting is out of the question then the people waiting for adobe to provide an alternative hosting solution can then begin re-writing parts with an alternative to LCCS
Just had a co-worker point out this possible OpenSource alternative that claims it can handle streaming video, both RTMP and RTMPS http://www.fluorinefx.com/
I haven't had the opportunity to explore it yet. Has anyone had any experience with it?
http://www.fluorinefx.com/ sounds very promising.
Anyone tried it?
It would be great to also share the hosting solutions too.
For example if i need to use BlazeDS and Red5 in place of LCCS, how should i host the services easely? As one of the main interests of LCCS was the "no server side worries".
Hi Community Members,
Even after I heard of discontinuation plans for lccs I kept my nose to the grindstone and completed my lccs app. Good thing I did, that thing works great, no latency, no echo and of course screen sharing is a great feature. So, it's good to hear that a successor to continue lccs may be possible; I've used Influxis and if it was to be those guys, they are great.
To the point; I've spent the last 3 weeks getting VideoIO,
http://myprojectguide.org/p/flash-videoio/index.html to work and after teaching myself how to do the PythonPath and downloading Cygwin to open Python scripts on a windows machine, that program looks like it's going to work great too. Developing from where VideoIO leaves you I think will allow you to make great communication apps. The VideoIO developer has a companion project called VideoCity that works exactly like lccs rooms so if it's rooms you want that's a possibility too.
I havn't spend much time on FVNC but it could turn out to be a viable flash screen share app because it's suppose to tunnel behind routers, which has always been the limitation to VNC. There's light at the end of the tunnel.
I see someone has followed up on my mention of Influxis. While I think they would be a good fit for carrying on lccs and they are great guys, I have no inside information that such an occurance is likely to happen. Of course we all hope someone comes forward to maintain lccs and the sooner the better.
Hi Jeff, good to ear that discussions are going on.
But would you have a timeframe (at least a rough one).
Do you think that in 1 month from now, we should have definitive answer that would be positive or negative?
I know its hard question, but as Adobe fixed the 9 month deadline, time is running up for us.
ps: Thats why Adobe shouldhave engaged those discussions BEFORE announcing a deadline.
I hope they learned about it, but sadly im not so sure.
We are getting very close to a completed deal with a hosting partner to take over the LCCS service. I had hoped to make an announcement this week as I am going on vacation for the next two weeks, but we are not quite there yet. I have arranged for an announcement to be sent out once the deal closes. In parallel with the work on the agreement we have been working with this partner to prepare them to take over the service. The plan is for them to have their service up and running by October 1 to ensure a smooth transition. We should have more news soon. Thanks for your continued patience.
Very good news.
But when an official announcement will be done, once the deal is complete, it would be important that Adobe officially guaranty that the service will not be shut down on Adobe side, before the new service is fully running on the new side.
And don't forget that a lot of people is waiting to know if the new hosted service will be full featured, especially we need to know if the screen sharing will still be available?
Thanks a lot for your personal hard work to get a decent solution.
Good news Jeff,
As soon as you guys get the chance to disclose some info, I would be very interested in knowing how the future pricing will compare to the paid services that we had with Adobe. Because otherwise, I might have to continue with the development of an alternative, as I'd rather not hang my hopes on them springing the prices on us in Oct.
That's not totally clear just yet. The hosting partner is looking at this now. We do expect that there will be some changes, but are not expecting that they will be radical. This may not be resolved by the time that we have our formal announcement of the deal, but it won't take until October to get it sorted out either.
We are still working through the final details of the agreement. Yes it's taking longer than I thought too. The good news is that we have been working in parallel with the partner to get them setup with the LCCS source and they've been building out the application so that we can meet our October goals.
I know I sound like a broken record, but I expect to announce a final agreement soon.
Thanks for your continued patience.
Your application should easily transfer over to the new service hosted by another provider.
So you could develop with LCCS. We aren't accepting new customers on LCCS, so as long as you already have an account setup to work with you are ok.