I don't use that feature, but if they show back up again when you open a raw input file a second time that means they're stored as metadata.

If you set your system to store metadata in a sidecar XMP file (rather than the central database), you could conceivably find and read that data, since XMP is just text.

Of course, Camera Raw can't be set to avoid writing the metadata back into some kinds of input files, so depending on your input file format you might not find the sidecar XMP file.  If you're opening JPEG or DNG, among others, you're out of luck.

I am currently lobbying for a setting to force Camera Raw to always avoid writing back into any kind of input files:  http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/add_an_option_to _prevent_writing_back_into_input_files

Please add your +1 if such a setting would help you with your goal to always be able to read settings from an XMP file, e.g., with a script.

-Noel

Hasta ahora caigo en cuenta de que te refieres al "gotero" ("eyedropper tool").  Lo que todavía no entiendo es lo de "classified".  ¿Clasificado?  Perdona, pero no está muy claro.

Pues sigo sin darme por enterado.  En Adobe Camera Raw existe una herramienta llamada «Color Sampler», que viene siendo una herramienta para tomar muestras de colores, y tiene un ícono simbólico en forma de gotero, o sea gotero de muestreo.

Si Adobe «tradujo» muestreo y muestras al castellano como Classificaciones (¡Con doble s, como aparece en tu captura de pantalla!), fue una metedura de pata monumental. 

¡Las cosas que se ven en Internet!

Casi me inclino por apostar por una copia pirateada del programa.

Color Classifier es otra cosa muy diferente: 

http://www.chromaus.com/product_7211_Solar_Cell_Color_Classifier.php

No sé qué quieres decir con " mui "  ¿Muy ridículo?

I just assumed he was talking about the sampler, given the picture, and was hoping to import the positions as samplers in Photoshop proper.  I didn't understand that literally; it took some reading between the lines.  I don't know Spanish, so I just assumed "sampling" was somehow obviously related to "classifying" via quirks of translation.  Apparently that's not the case.

And I'm sorry I didn't know whether those samplers remained with the metadata; it's too bad that apparently they don't.

-Noel

Pedro Cortez Marques wrote:

 

The more I look at that massive misspelling in that button, the more I suspect this is an unauthorized version of ACR/Photoshop.

It goes way beyond that, Noel.  Even if the mistranslation were allowed to stand by agreement of two clueless, improvised translators, as you suggest, the button reads "Apagar Classificadores", a coarse, massive misspelling unlikely for any native Spanish speaker with even a second-grade education.

Interesting.  When I passed "Classificadores" through some machine translators some of them came up with the proposal that the phrase is spelled properly in Portuguese.

Could we perhaps be seeing a Portuguese version of Photoshop?

-Noel

All this is very interesting but...to the OP's question, no the color sampers in ACR are NOT stored nor transfered anywhere (in fact not stored between launches of ACR).So, forget about it...