Adobe's tech people do suck... every one knows this.  But you are wrong about them having a monopoly on the editing business.  There are many other programs to use, some of which are free, that work fairly well.  What Adobe has done is given up on the professional photographers.  These programs are too CHEAP!  $35 per month for access to the entire Adobe Master Collection means that any moron with a camera can now claim to have access to professional software thereby even more degrading the "professional photography" market.

camerarchitect wrote:

 

You got to be kidding me.  Stop asking baby questions.

 

<SNIP>

 

So the spec on either of my laptop or computer is not an issues

Stop your self-important ranting and have another look at Victoria's post - you'll see that she wasn't asking you, she was replying to kstyle13's post.

In fact, at no point has Victoria addressed you - presumably because you already have all the answers.

self-important or not, I just want the some noticable results.  Obviously this issues happens on some computers and Adobe hasn't pointed out why or I haven't gotten the answer.  I did apolized to Victoria for thinking her reply to is for someone else. In general a simple reponse like do you have window 7 or vista is like someone just wants to post on a forum to be nice, but..

A couple things I will tried like other people with issues done:   Download via IE (I use firefox mostly) and extract it on as many different computers I have at home.

I will continue with the the phone text support, whenever I get the chance to call back during their hours.  I will report back any fixes or reasons they found out.

degrade the "professional photography market"

I would say the advent in increase preformance of the aps-c dslr to the mass market has more to do with that.  Anybody with a entry to midrange camera with a cheap 50mm prime can take almost pro like result.  Sensors has increase in dynamic range and color depth (sony sensors good example) the last two years has made even consumer cameras taking great photos.  Look at flickr, hard to tell a pro from a very good prosumers these days, the saturation of good photographer is greater every year.  Pro got to either get better (more creative) or do more videos for paid events to seperate themselves.

oberli77777 wrote:

 

Got it installed! For some reason, u have to download it with the Internet Explorer. I tried about 8 times by using firefox and it never worked. Problems exactly as described in here. Download with IE. No more a problem. good luck!.

Ok, I will shut up and leave now.  I just did this comment above and downloaded from Internet Explorer 9; unzipped and it installed fine.  I usually use Firefox.  I stilll prefer firefox for browsing ie: speed, security and spell checking (IE9 none here).  Maybe some of my security settings are more restricted on firefox then they are on IE, and I get an unfinished download.  This is the first time I ever encountered downloading files differently on different browsers (beside the speed).

That is all.  No more childish rant from me.  Now I will turn off the email noticifation for this thread.  Now if LR4 can read .nef file as good as NX then I would even be more happy.