Today I upgraded to CS6, both Design/Web Premium and Audition.
After really being attracted, and thinking a lot about it, I didn't do so via Creative Cloud. I think you might like to consider why, and things that can be good to do about it.
I'm a long-time customer and adept with the tools, but it's important to know that what I do with them is to the side rather than in the center of my endeavors. In that, I suspect I'm like very many of your customers besides those directly in design shops.
Probably many of us have also been the every-other-release updaters, which rather than 'avoiding paying up' put our income stream for you in a balance with value received. I might add that I've been an consultant executive starting new media business within a big name, and fully understand the draw that subscription business models can have, if you can subtly choose and thus successfully manage them.
Here are the deepest problems Creative Cloud showed to me at present:
What can you do about this? And maximize your profits?
.
The short of it is, subscriptions give Adobe a kind of security. Any but the most corporate of your customers need their own security in return. By improving the terms of the Creative Cloud, you will improve our ability to support you in it. Removing the threat of what happens when circumstances indicate we leave,and during periods it doesn't make individual sense to participate, would create the real virtuous circle here.
Thanks for considering this, as well as you've considered some other things and made appropriate changes, which we notice in recent times. Appreciated.
Better exit strategy? Agreed. I get the impression that Adobe's still mulling that one over and we may see more mutually beneficial terms emerge in future.
Don't know that anyone other than Adobe is happy with the current all-or-nothing terms.
Mid-cycle feature updates for perpetual customers? Won't happen other than the 0.5 releases (wonder how much longer they'll be around?). That's one of the UPSes (Unique Selling Propositions) of the Cloud.
Clearly, Adobe eventually wants to deliver all its software via subscription. They are going in the same direction as mobile (cell) phone carriers and utilities (gas/water/electricity) providers.
2010/2011's subscription model offered little value to most and got a muted response. The 2012/2013 Cloud model is much closer to the mark and the adoption rate is much higher but still being tweaked (e.g. Lightroom just arrived).
The Cloud's value obviously tempts you (so you're obviously on the fringe of the target market)- but not quite enough yet to sign up. I'm sure the balance will tip soon and tempt you again.
I'm sure the Cloud offerings will improve over time.
Thanks for your reply, John.
Glad you think the exit-rentry rules can be improved, and that Adobe sees there's still a problem there. That's where I hope my suggestion can help.
On the mid-cycle updates uniformly across customers, that's kind of my point -- that there can be more effectiveness for Adobe by using nuanced thinking. What may seem at first a USP for only Creative Cloud may be better recognized as a USP for Adobe applications however you are receiving them.
I hope the rest of the 'story' gives a chance for a fresh look on all the matters. It's a nice way to progress.
Regards
Narr GM Coro wrote:
On the mid-cycle updates uniformly across customers, that's kind of my point -- that there can be more effectiveness for Adobe by using nuanced thinking. What may seem at first a USP for only Creative Cloud may be better recognized as a USP for Adobe applications however you are receiving them.
I think Adobe's message is: sign up to the Cloud (to get your regular freshly baked updates) and forget about anachronistic perpetual licenses ![]()
North America
Europe, Middle East and Africa
Asia Pacific