Hi
Background
LR has a backup routine that you can configure.
LR has a reference to each photo in its database - not the pictures itself.
Question
What is in the backup - the LR database (with the references) or the actual pictures?
Background cont
The reason I'm asking is that I have a pretty big bunch of picture data (approx 16-17 TB data distributed on 7 NAS servers). This is already under a welf unctioning backup routine. So if LR tries to handle to huge set of data - it would be hopeless and unnecessary.
But if backup in the LR world means backup of the database (with all the references etc) it would make good sense.
If you were to look in your backup folder (as designated in your backup preferences) you would see that it only backs up the database or catalog (*.lrcat), which simply contains all of the adjustments you have made in Lightroom. It does NOT backup your images! Your other backup routine should be doing that.
Thank you both
Thats cool. A backup of all the picture data (on servers) are taken care of. I have a mechanism that work good and without too much work and hassle.
I'm installing, testing and evaluating LR and haven't got around to the LR back routine before now.
Shifting to LR on this large amount of pictures takes a bunch of tests. Right now I'm replicating a couple of TB's data and is testing the setup. But before letting LR runs its backup routine I would just make sure that LR didn't try to wrestle to picture data on the server.
Once again, thanks for your quick answer.
If a supplementary question is allowed.
Do any of you have some experience to rather big amount of picture data and LR.
As described I have approx 16-17 TB growing each year.
Does this amount of data handled by LR - lead to performance problems, stability problem etc?
North America
Europe, Middle East and Africa
Asia Pacific