Skip navigation
Currently Being Moderated

When to use crop vs. clipping mask

Aug 14, 2012 8:49 AM

Tags: #illustrator #mask #cs5 #crop #clip #clipping

I've done some tests and it looks like clipping mask and pathfinder>crop (CS5) do pretty much the same thing.  I realize that clipping mask leaves the paths of the original objects for possible release while crop is creating a new path.

 

When would you choose to use one vs. the other?  The only thing I can think of is when you want to end up with a new object use crop but if you want to maintain the integrity of the original objects use clipping mask.

 

Is it a toss up?

 

Tom

 
Replies
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 14, 2012 8:50 AM   in reply to TCarp

    It really depends upon the art and desired result.

     

    A bit like asking when to use Blue compared to Red.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 14, 2012 8:56 AM   in reply to TCarp

    TCarp,

     

    In addition to what Scott said, it may be a matter of avoiding whichever drawbacks may be relevant in each case, or choose between them.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 15, 2012 1:29 AM   in reply to TCarp

    Clipping masks hide object areas which fall outside the top shape.

     

    Pathfinder Crop deletes object areas which fall outside the top shape.

     

    Clipping masks = all your original shapes are still in tact, simply hidden.

    Pathfinder Crop = Your original shapes are gone and have been edited to create new shapes which conform to the crop boundaries.

     

    Both Clipping Masks and Pathfinder Crop use the top object as a defining area. There is no difference there. I don't see where you're getting "clip uses the top and bottom shapes". That is compeltely inaccurate.

     

    Clipping masks can contain an infinate amount of objects. Pathfinder Crop can also work with a very large number of objects. However, Pathfinder operations can ocassionally have problems with strokes, or symbols, or brushes, becaase they need to be.... well, cropped which may not always fall in a desired location for the object.

     

    In the end it comes down to the inital difference at the start of this very post..... do you want to hide objects or remove them? Do you wish to work destructively or non-destructively? Neither one is "better" they are merely different.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 15, 2012 2:38 AM   in reply to TCarp

    TCarp,

     

    You may also have a look at Object>Path>Divide Objects below (with deletion of outlying paths).

     

    And you may have a look at what happens with strokes.

     

    In any case, always keep a copy of the artwork before you do something irreversible. For more complicated and thorough changes made within a layer, you may simply duplicate the layer and keep the old one as a draft you may go back to.

     
    |
    Mark as:

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Answers + Points = Status

  • 10 points awarded for Correct Answers
  • 5 points awarded for Helpful Answers
  • 10,000+ points
  • 1,001-10,000 points
  • 501-1,000 points
  • 5-500 points