Skip navigation
Currently Being Moderated

Laptop specs for good LR 4 performance

Aug 31, 2012 7:13 PM

Tags: #performance #laptop #4.1

My current computer is sort of adequate running LR 4.1, but that is all.  My computer is 2.5 years old so I have been planning to get a new one anyway, but I have held off because I have seen many posts  from people who have bought/built new, high spec computers and many of them have worse LR performance than I do.  So, clearly, just having a high spec computer will not necessarily mean I will be better off.  It seems I must be very careful and get just the right combination that works well with LR and it doesn't even have to be so high spec.  That's good for me.

 

I am currently using a Win7-64 17.3" laptop with i3-330m, 4gb, 500gb hd.  I changed to 8gb a couple of months ago, but after a month I started getting tons of blue screens so I took the new memory out and put the old back in and all is fine again.  The 8gb didn't seem to help any with LR 4.1 anyway since I didn't notice any performance difference. Even with only 4gb I have never seen total memory usage with LR and Firefox (multiple open tabs) push memory usage up past about 85% of the 4gb and usually it is more like 70%.  I am talking about at the bottom of the Task Manager window where it says, for example:

 

Processes: 75  CPU Usage: 6%  Physical Memory:  59%

 

Even if I also have PSE 9 open also it only on rare occasions for very short periods spikes up to about 95%.  I never do batch processing though.  Processing Canon 60D, Sony A700, Olympus E-M5, and Panasonic G3 raw files.

 

It seems a bit of a crapshoot these days with LR 4 since I see many people who have high spec systems, but some of them have terrible performance problems.  Other people get good performance.  I wish Adobe would tell us exactly which brands, model numbers, etc. we need to buy to get the good performance since sometimes I see that even rather mid spec computers sometimes get good performance and better than some of the high spec computers.  It seems there are certain mysterious combinations of components that LR likes and some combinations it doesn't like.  My 2.5 year old laptop, which these days is sort of low-mid spec, is not too bad with LR 4 -- not as bad as some of the high spec people.  I just don't want to buy something new, higher spec and then discover LR is worse with it.

 

I want to get another 17.3" laptop since I need something that is reasonably mobile because I live part-time in various places.  What specs do I need to make it worthwhile to make the LR experience enough better to be worth the trouble and money?  I don't need the best, high-end, especially since I have read so often that many of those computer have worse LR performance than even my old one.  i5?  AMD?  SSD or hybrid hd?

 

Also, does anyone know if LR works better under Win8?  Most new computers will start having Win8 on them this fall.

 
Replies
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Sep 1, 2012 4:11 AM   in reply to bakubo

    Bear in mind that most laptops have poor screens for colour editing.  A TN screen really isn't much use for judging colour, as the colour rendering varies with the angle of view.  Some have reasonable screens - my Dell XPS15 with the 1920x1080 display isn't bad - but I don't do serious editing until I get home and can work on a desktop with a monitor with IPS technology. 

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Sep 4, 2012 10:32 AM   in reply to bakubo

    Unfortunately, it's a crapshoot.  There doesn't seem to be any particular brand or configuration that works "all the time".  And I think that is why you haven't had a lot of response.  I'm still using a Windows 7 32-bit desktop, 4 GB RAM.  Everyone will tell you that I am terribly underpowered.  But I'm satisfied with my performance is a Lightroom 4.2 RC.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Sep 4, 2012 12:59 PM   in reply to bakubo

    As far as I know, the official word from Adobe is contained in the "system requirements" statement.  And that pretty much outlines the minimum requirements for running Lightroom.  I don't work for Adobe and I don't know any of the people who do.  But my observation is that they are working on the problem because I experienced a performance improvement when I installed the 4.2 RC.  And this is a user-to-user forum.  Several Adobe employees participate here on occasion.  But Adobe has never commented on progress nor have they ever announced when or if updates, improvements, changes will be released.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Sep 4, 2012 1:19 PM   in reply to JimHess

    I've got a 2 gig dual core with 4 gig RAM and a 1 gig video card and

    performance of LR4.1 is appalling. I simply don't use it now and as I

    was refused a refund I hold out every hope that one day they'll code it

    so that it works better than it does now.

     
    |
    Mark as:

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Answers + Points = Status

  • 10 points awarded for Correct Answers
  • 5 points awarded for Helpful Answers
  • 10,000+ points
  • 1,001-10,000 points
  • 501-1,000 points
  • 5-500 points