"SaschaSchwartz" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote
in message
news:f33nvk$9d7$1@forums.macromedia.com...
> It would highly speed up the acceptance of this
framework, i consider it
> to be
> one of the best ajax frameworks there are, but if you
have to turn to
> handcoding, why not use scriptacoulus instead?
Simply because Scriptacoulus has nothing that can compare to
Spry's dataset
and data centric functionality :-)))
YUI is slowly introducing something that moves in that
direction, but it's
far behind. This is an area where Spry is well ahead of the
rest of the pack
(when it comes to effects or widgets instead you can find
plenty of
excellent alternatives).
Don't get me wrong, I see and understand your point, I just
want to let you
know that there are many people who are using Spry outside of
DW, they are
more than happy to hand code and are choosing Spry for its
unique features
set. As you can imagine, those people see things in a
different perspective.
--
----------------------------
Massimo Foti, web-programmer for hire
Tools for ColdFusion and Dreamweaver developers:
http://www.massimocorner.com
----------------------------
