What is your use case & what is wrong with current name
Well, the Sidekick only supports 4 accordion tabs before it places all of the remaining components in the "Other" bucket. To resolve this (and frankly to make it more intuitive for our Authors), we'd want to consolidate the following components into a "Personalization & Social" componentGroup:
Teaser
Multivariate Testing (We'd rename to "AB Testing")
4 of the components under the Social Plugins group
Test & Target mBox
4 custom social share/follow components we created.
As it stands, the 11 components above are represented in 4 separate component groups. Is it unreasonable to want to consolidate these and make it easier for the Author to locate and use?
Why do you spend time on renaming the title without any added functionality
Because there isn't a way to easily move components into the sidekick folders your customers wish; unless there is and I'm not aware of it (hence my question). You are correct that it is fairly inefficient to copy an entire component without adding functionality just to rename or set the sidekick folder hierarchy.
Yes recommended way is to overlay.
Not clear I'm understanding your response. If I have to copy the entire component, don't we become out-of-sync when 5.6 is released?
