Hi dj_paige,
"I know that Raw photo files generally don’t have embedded color profiles. For raw files, the Develop module assumes a wide color space based on the color values of the ProPhoto RGB color space. ProPhoto RGB encompasses most colors that cameras can record." See About color management in Lightroom
But I want to know in which colorspace the original RAW photo was taken, just as I can see the metadata focal length, aperture, shutter and ISO value.
Thanks for helping, but:
The Dutch Nikon D800 usermanual on page 274 says: JPG files made in the color space Adobe RGB are DFC-compliant.
And in the book "Mastering the Nikon D800 by Darrel Young" on page 125 - 126 is written: "If you shoot in RAW format a lot, you may want to consider using Adobe RGB....." and "Even with a JPEG's limited color capacity, the colors in the JPEG represent a broader range of color when you use Adobe RGB".
Conclusion:
- For RAW I can use: Adobe RGB or sRGB
- For JPEG I can use: Adobe RGB or sRGB
But my simple question is: I want that Lightroom shows me the original color space metadata.
Is there a Adobe professional available that can answer my question?
The reason Darrel recommend shooting in Adobe RGB while shooting Raw is so that your JPEG thumbnail embedded in the Raw file looks more like a Raw file and less like a JPEG. Many pros do this and also turn down the contrast on the JPEG preview as well. It gives them a ball-park view of the Raw file before you actually run it through a Raw converter. It has nothing to do with the Raw file and only applies to the JPEG thumbnail.
You can specify Adobe RGB and sRGB for either but it does nothing to your Raw file.
Lightroom cannot show something that doesn't exist - ie. the Color Space of a Raw file.
Lastly, this is a user-to-user forum and an official answer from Adobe Employees is unlikely. Regardless, no matter how many times you ask the question, the answer will be the same.
If you want to post to the Official (Bug and Feature Request forum) it is here: http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/products/photoshop_fami ly_photoshop_lightroom
Van-Paul wrote:
In the Shooting menu of my Nikon D800 I can set Color space to: sRGB or Adobe RGB.
So I want Lightroom to show me this metadata.
Lightroom only shows the exif metadata that Adobe chose to support - colorspace did not make the cut.
The only way to see this metadata in Lightroom is with the help of a plugin, e.g.
Reminder: colorspace chosen in camera does not affect raw data nor Lightroom's rendering of it (it is stored in the raw file, and is critical to proper interpretation of color in the jpeg preview which is embedded in the raw file, but does not affect raw photo processing).
Rob
Van-Paul wrote:
in the book "Mastering the Nikon D800 by Darrel Young" on page 125 - 126 is written: "If you shoot in RAW format a lot, you may want to consider using Adobe RGB....."
Conclusion:
- For RAW I can use: Adobe RGB or sRGB
This statement is misleading, in my opinion. Consider consulting author and suggest improved wording.
Although colorspace *does* affect the raw file - i.e. the jpeg preview(s) in it, it does not affect the raw data, and it is ignored in Lightroom (except potentially for a brief moment when displaying the embedded preview from the raw file, before it is supplanted by Lr's rendering of the raw data - but it is probably even ignored then as well - dunno), and it is ignored in other raw data processors as well, for the most part (except potentially, like Lightroom, when displaying the embedded previews...).
Rob
Happy New Year and thanks for all the answers!
Nevertheless, I want to hear from a Nikon and Adobe expert how color space, JPEG and RAW interact.
So I will mail them the questions below:
Questions for Nikon and Adobe:
If you shoot in RAW format a lot, you may want to consider using Adobe RGB
This is pure and utter nonsense. As the others have told you repeatedly: a raw file has no color space. It is opened into one in the raw converter. The camera setting is totally and completely irrelevant.
There is no need for any Nikon or Adobe "expert" to comment on this. This is simply how it works, end of story. Period. But unfortunately many people fail to understand this, so the misunderstanding gets propagated.
The camera jpeg, however, is fully processed in the camera and that's a completely different story.
That said, it could of course happen that Nikon put something in the metadata so that Capture NX would open it into the "user-chosen" space. But that would be the only reason for it.
Van-Paul wrote:
I want to hear from a Nikon and Adobe expert
Good luck with that.
Warning: if you do get an answer from the company rep(s), it probably won't be from an "expert" - it will probably come from somebody who doesn't understand it as well as those in this forum who've already commented.
Maybe time to accept that user's-manual and other book writers don't always get it quite right...
PS - I am 100% confident about my understanding of it, despite not having a badge by my name...
Happy N'Year,
Rob
I suppose I should just let this pass, as the question has been answered several times over already, and there's really nothing to add.
But I just can't resist: The.concept.of.color.space.does.not.apply.to.a.raw.file. How many times should I repeat that? Because I can keep this up for a long time.
When you're ready to find out how a raw workflow in Lightroom really works, come back, instead of chasing this red herring.
I hope you can shake a little sense into Nikon. Their D300 manual makes no distinction whatsoever between settings that affect jpegs (almost all of them) and those that affect raw data too (essentially just the basic exposure settings). - very confusing to a raw newb.
Please report what they say if you get a response.
Thanks,
Rob
Rob Cole wrote:
Their D300 manual makes no distinction
I suspect that's because they want all Nikon shooters to use Capture NX - or rather are in denial that anyone should choose not to - so they probably put those parameters into the NEF metadata, and Capture NX can pick it up from there. Integrated workflow and all that....
To everybody else, that's just another example of "don't think, let us do the thinking for you". And as a result, people never learn how the stuff really works.
Some camera models change their filename pattern as a prompt, whenever the camera is set to AdobeRGB instead of sRGB.
For example, they may show the first character of your JPGs as an underscore - Pentax, for instance, change IMGPxxxxxx.jpg to _IGPxxxxxx.jpg
Because these cameras may sometimes be set to Raw+JPG (and the main filename still needs to match) you see the same change in Raw filenames also.
twenty_one wrote:
So if the OP really needs to know what his camera was set to (for some other reason than whether it has any effect whatsoever on the raw file...), it's in the original file name.
The problem with this, obviously, is that unless one uses the original filename verbatim when renaming upon import from card, such information will be lost, since the tokens available for renaming otherwise exclude such information...
I'm actually in agreement with the general request: support 100% of exif-metadata in Lightroom, natively, but even so, it is definitely worthwhile understanding the scope of influence of in-camera colorspace...
If in-camera colorspace were available as a renaming token, I certainly would not use it.
Rob
Nikon's anwwer is here
North America
Europe, Middle East and Africa
Asia Pacific