Skip navigation
Currently Being Moderated

LR Vs Elements organiser

Jan 17, 2013 4:23 AM

I've been looking at LR 4.3 and Elements.

If you have Elements 11, with it's fairly decent organiser, is there

actually a need for Lightroom?




  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 17, 2013 5:01 AM   in reply to howmanypigginnamesdoitry

    In my opinion, you can't talk about only the Organizer in PSE vs only the Library Module in Lightroom, because both are integrated with the rest of their respective programs.


    Nevertheless, in my opinion, having used both, the Lightroom Library module is a superior piece of software compared to the PSE Organizer. By that I mean, Lightroom's Library module has more powerful tools, a smoother and more logical interface, and fewer and less serious bugs than the PSE Organizer (although I am not saying that the LR Library Module is bug-free).


    Given the integration of the Organizer/Library Module to the rest of their respective programs, I would recommend that anyone who owns both programs use Lightroom's Library Module as the "organizer", and Lightroom's Develop Module as the primary editor, with PSE's Organizer as the secondary editor. It does not make sense to me to use thse two programs in any other configuration.


    Of course, if you want to choose/buy only one piece of software, then that's a different story, and of course you would pick the one that meets your needs the best.

    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 17, 2013 6:21 AM   in reply to howmanypigginnamesdoitry

    The two programs have different capabilities and different strengths. Of course there are things that Lightroom can do that PSE cannot do (and vice versa).


    But if PSE meets your needs, then as I said, that's the one you should pick.

    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 17, 2013 7:34 AM   in reply to howmanypigginnamesdoitry

    There is no complete list of the differences between LR and PSE, that I know of. It would be a pretty long list, IMHO.


    Perhaps you could shed some light and tell us what functions are important to you, and then we can inform you whether they exist in PSE or LR or both.

    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 17, 2013 10:03 AM   in reply to dj_paige

    I second Paige's advice. If you have strong needs for organizing and searching a large number of photos, LR is superior to PSE, both in functionality and the number of bugs. Adobe is still actively supporting LR, which is marketed to demanding professionals and prosumers, while it off-shored the PSE Organizer to a bargain-basement engineering team years ago.  (I maintained the primary PSE Organizer FAQ before finally defecting to LR.)


    So get LR for its Library and Develop module ($114 at Amazon) and the PSE Editor ($70) for the small percentage of time you need Photoshop's pixel-editing.

    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jan 18, 2013 7:38 AM   in reply to howmanypigginnamesdoitry

    I'm not going to even try to type in a complete list of differences between the two programs (in fact, I don't even know EVERY feature of both programs, so it is an impossible task).


    But if you were to specify certain features of interest, I'm sure that I (and others) could compare LR to PSE.

    Mark as:

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Answers + Points = Status

  • 10 points awarded for Correct Answers
  • 5 points awarded for Helpful Answers
  • 10,000+ points
  • 1,001-10,000 points
  • 501-1,000 points
  • 5-500 points