I'm sick of typing <font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"></font> to style my HTML emails. I know, some here will say that I should use inline CSS, and I would, but I've found some email system strip out CSS, so to be safe, some elements I want in plain HTML.
Unfortunately, Dreamweaver forces me to use CSS if I want to style my text through the properties panel. Is there a way I can use the properties panel, but force Dreamweaver to use HTML styling INSTEAD of CSS?
This is not what I asked for. I know CSS, I know how to do inline styles. What I want is to be able to select text in the Design View and style it in the properties panel. I want Dreamweaver to add the code for me, and I want it to add it in old school HTML, NOT in CSS.
The HTML <font> tag is deprecated and as such is not part of Dreamweaver anymore (that I know of). The <font> tag is not required for HTML email - there is absolutely no issue with most 'basic' inline CSS styles. What email clients do you think are stripping the inline style?
It was not an email client, but when I used to work for my last employer, there was something in the system that was stripping out all CSS. Inline styles were stripped too. So it's not the client, but it can still happen. I don't like it either, but now to be perfectly safe, I've switched back to using font tags...
I want Dreamweaver to add the [deprecated & invalid] code for me...
Then find a different editor. Off hand, I don't know of any good editors that produce old school HTML styles anymore. Probably because you don't it -- even for E-mails.
Thr problem with "inline" styling is (as I found last summer when I facelifted a friend's site) that it makes your site HUGE from a file size standpoint. These days that may not seem like a big deal with nearly everyone on a broadband connection, but there are still a sizeable number of people on a limited bandwidth Internet plan with their cell phone provider, and there are still hosting services (GoDaddy is one) that limit bandwidth similarly under certain plans.
The site I facelifted was built with tables and 100% inline styiling (redundant font tags, overlapping styles between <td> cells and the content in them, full size images resized with code, etc.) it was fourteen pages at nearly 75Kb per page when I started. When I was done it was between 11 and 17Kb per page with an 8Kb stylesheet. It looked IDENTICAL to the original build, but it was literally a fifth of the size - pages loaded faster on his cell phone, and his "traffic" went down by about 70% with his provider the following month and each month since.
CSS is not a bad thing. If it was, it wouldn't have replaced inline styiling as the idustry standard.
The principle is the same. INLINE styling of each and every word or element adds tons of code to a webpage or an email. Since Dreamweaver is a "web editor" and not an "email" client or editor, I figured the advice would apply.
Yes you do need it, in some cases.
I don't think you do.
I think far too much emphasis is placed on formatted e-mails. Especially given how many people regularly use web mail clients (no images, no html, no css).
If your e-mails don't contain plain text, a vast number of people are going to see nothing unless they opt to click a link to your site -- which is kind of rare. So all this noise about HTML vs CSS formatting in e-mails is much ado about nothing. Plain text is and always has been the best way to communicate in e-mails.
Just my 2 cents,
Nancy O. said:
"I think far too much emphasis is placed on formatted e-mails. Especially given how many people regularly use web mail clients (no images, no html, no css)."
That speaks VOLUMES pal. VOLUMES. Imagine if every letter you mailed was on glossy perfumed paper with an envelope that played a digital tune when the recipient opened it.
While most people might enjoy that, sooner or later, someone would tell you to stop mailing them.
I have a client who, against my advice, went with a web host that only allows 100Mb of mail storage for ANYONE that doesn't pay them an additional $49.99 a year ON TOP of their hosting. She e-mails me artwork to add to her image gallery monthly. Those emails have to be downloaded and deleted or I'll run out of mailbox before two months is up. If she wanted to add 120kb (or more) to each and every e-mail with a bunch of pretty decoration I could really care less about, it would go even quicker, because she emails me sometimes as many as thirty times a day, often referencing past emails. She's quirky, but she pays me and if I want to keep up with everything she's doing and telling me, I have to keep those emails somewhere, so I download them. If I don't want them taking up too much space in my mailbox, I CERTAINLY don't want them taking up too much space on my hard drive.
"Keep It Simple, Stupid" is what my old professor used to say.
jesus what a bunch of garbage. Well thanks for nothing everyone. I don't know what happened to these forums. Amateur hour here now. I used to come to these forums all the time, but I guess I'm not missing anything anymore. I asked a simple question and the only person that came close to an answer was Rik. Thanks Rik for the attempt at understanding my original question. I don't care about your theory, I have a job to do and wanted a simple way to make it easier. If you don't have the answer don't post here. I don't want your advice, I don't want you suggestions on a 'better way to do my job'. I know how to do my job and we are not going to stop sending fancy emails. If you don't have the answer, DON'T POST!
Don't shoot the messengers, Pal. You're asking for something that is not possible in current versions of DW. Also, un-wanted by anybody except you. So I won't even suggest that you file a feature request.
Best of luck!
No pleasing some people so I don't even try.
It's like the fools who ask "What's the best way to embed a full volume MP3 so it plays automatically as soon as the page opens?"
That's like asking "What's the best way to skin a live puppy in front of the children it belongs to?"
Best answer is DON'T.
Good luck with your fancy shmancy email garek007, but you ain't gonna do it in DW and you shouldn't to begin with