Skip navigation
Currently Being Moderated

File Complexity/Size Maintenance; Paths vs Compund Objects

Sep 19, 2013 1:19 PM

Tags: #save #path #stroke #filesize

I have found myself using different methods to make designs, but I was wondering what was the best practice for archiving FINISHED products.

 

In terms of anchor and path complexity: would it be best to save files as paths with width controls, or should I be outlining strokes and flattening as compound objects?

 

If it turns out that the results would vary with every project, then I can accept saving two versions and deleting whichever happens to be the bigger file.

 
Replies
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Sep 19, 2013 2:41 PM   in reply to Puzmen

    Puzmen,

     

    FINISHED products

     

    And you believe in that concept?

     

    You should always keep a copy of the fully editable version before it(s continued development prospect) is destroyed.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Sep 20, 2013 7:22 AM   in reply to Puzmen

    Puzmen,

     

    let's pretend I have a client

     

    What about a separate PDF for that, either saved without AI editing capabilities or printed to PDF, for smallest possible file size?

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Sep 20, 2013 3:32 PM   in reply to Puzmen

    Puzmen,

     

    I believe the saving option Smallest File Size is about as good (small) as it gets.

     

    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/illustrator/cs/using/WS714a382cdf7d304e7e0 7d0100196cbc5f-654fa.html

     
    |
    Mark as:

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Answers + Points = Status

  • 10 points awarded for Correct Answers
  • 5 points awarded for Helpful Answers
  • 10,000+ points
  • 1,001-10,000 points
  • 501-1,000 points
  • 5-500 points