Apr 9, 2009 8:25 AM
NNTP Users Say Goodbye
-
Like (0)
It has been four days since the turn over to the new forum and the NNTP news feed where turned off. This was the first time most NNTP users learned of the change since the new forum was not mentioned on the news feeds. If one used a news reader to access the forums one seldom, if ever, accessed the web user interface which was the only place the announcement of the pending new forum was.
Thus there have been some very active threads about the lack of NNTP access to these forums.
1) NO NNTP News Feed = A loss of a lot of helpful people.
2) Bring back NNTP forum or I'm quitting
If you review these threads you will find a lot of people who are not going to continue to use these forums without NNTP access and detailed reasons why the e-mail and rss feed are NOT acceptable as a substitute.
This is my resignation letter. I will not be contributing as much as I am used to doing. I may not have been the most prolific or most knowledgeable NNTP contribuitor, but I liked helping my fellow Adobe nee Macromedia nee Allaire ColdFusion users. I would review the CF forums several times a day between work tasks when I needed to take a mental breather. I have tried the e-mail subscription feature. The messages are jumbled, the subjects are unreadable, the content is fragmented and the headers do not follow the RFC standard so that my e-mail reader can not thread them properly. I have tried the RSS subscription feature. It is better in that the messages can be threaded and the subjects are readable, but it is one way and there is no convenient way to answer without opening a browser and waiting for two pages to render over and over again which takes a long time subjectively. And there are 6 RSS feeds for every forum and no explanation that I can find on why one would choose the different options.
I invite my fellow NNTP users to sign off here as I think we may be underrepresented in the feature discusion of the new forum. In the old forums we where all lumped together as a single user, it may not have been as apparent how many of us there are and how much we contributed. Doing some basic number crunch with the data I have access to, we may have been a small group of people but we seem to have been a prolific group, collectivily contributing almost a quarter of a million posts which is over 14% of the 1.6 million posts of all the forums.
I can not find, nor have I seen any official responses to our pleas to offer any hope that NNTP may or may not be a future option. Weather their will be any improvements in the e-mail feature and|or the web service API that would allow us to roll our own solution. Or any other commentary to give us an inclinning on weather our needs are being considered, this will probably be it for most of us.
I wish Adobe Forums good luck in the future and may check in now and agian to see what improvements their may be.
Ta Ta for now.
Ian
I think I have made it pretty clear already, but just to formalise:
"me too".
I'm going to keep an eye on a couple of topics I was helping on before the cut over, but other than that: I'm gone.
Cheers.
--
Adam
A Cameron wrote:
I think I have made it pretty clear already
I beleive we have all been pretty clear in different places. I felt like one last, collective, shouting against the thunder post before I go.
Plus, who knows, maybe if we can get enough of an informal, unscientific, nonbinding whos who of NNTP users maybe we can organize something
I was never an NNTP user, preferring email.
But, unless something drastic happens soon (or at least someone with clout says it's being worked on) I'll be off too.
I can not find, nor have I seen any official responses to our pleas to offer any hope that NNTP may or may not be a future option...
This from Adobe employee Dov Isaacs in the Typography forum yesterday:
"...it is unfortunate that the NNTP access is not available anymore. However, Adobe was put in a position where it was absolutely necessary to migrate from the previous service provider for the forums (the old forums and for that matter the new forums) are hosted outside of Adobe itself using third party software. For better or worse, most of the newer on-line forum software packages simply don't support NNTP anymore."
Noel
I, too, am very unhappy with the cessation of the NNTP feed. It was by far the most efficient method of reading and participating in the forums.
The RSS feed is poorly implemented - not only are posters not identified, but I have noticed that some messages do not appear. And, as Ian pointed out, it is not possible to contribute via RSS. The email subscriptions leave a lot to be desired too. Subjects are unclear and topics are not threaded. At the very least, an email digest should be provided. I'll hang around for a while to see what, if any, improvements are implemented.
Michael
> For better or worse, most of the newer on-line forum software packages simply don't support NNTP anymore
And they'd have a point if not for the fact that this system does support NNTP.
--
Adam
Shame they screwed up both RSS and email as well then.
Ildhund wrote:
I can not find, nor have I seen any official responses to our pleas to offer any hope that NNTP may or may not be a future option...
This from Adobe employee Dov Isaacs in the Typography forum yesterday:
"... For better or worse, most of the newer on-line forum software packages simply don't support NNTP anymore."
Noel
I am interested that there is something in a Typography forum, but no response to any of the actual NNTP threads that have been started in recent days.
I am also curious about the quote above in light of the link to the documentation of this forum provider that says it does support NNTP.
Re: NO NNTP News Feed = A loss of a lot of helpful people.
jochemd wrote:
Or that we could provide our own NNTP functionality if the e-mail functionality worked correctly and followed e-mail RFC standards.
Message was edited by: Ian Skinner
I invite my fellow NNTP users to sign off here as I think we may be underrepresented in the feature discusion of the new forum.
OK. I'm out as well.
I gave the test forum a good run while they were active and have given the live forums a good run, too. Today, I have spent too much time in just one of the forums I read regularly, trying to read the messages that are new since yesterday (4 pages of message headers at 50 headers per page - I think. That 50 keeps jumping back to 30).
With a newsreader, I would already have scanned all of the messages and would likely have posted several suggestions by now. I would have clear and obvious indications of threads I'm already involved in and of replies to my messages that may need further clarification or assistance. As it is, I have only made it to the second page of messages and have not posted a single suggestion. Just too much click-wait-load for my liking. And, as I feared, finding "unread" messages in threads of any length turned out to be the real deal-breaker for me.
As mentioned, the non-threading emails are of little help - in the threads I am participating in - and I don't even want to try subscribing to an entire forum without proper headers.
I may stop in once in a while in the hopes that they've enabled NNTP or to see of Jochem has managed to create one, but I don't hold much hope.
So long.
[Edit: Changed with proper headers to without proper headers.]
Yet another easy-to-use protocol bites the dust.
Best,
Christopher
This front-end sucks and NNTP was so much better.
I agree with Ian !
"We" just got an email Today stating why we should upgrade older Acrobat licenses to v9.1.
You bet I'll be replying how Adobe screwed up in killing off NNTP access.
for many of the reasons already cited above I will no longer be an everyday reader and poster here
cya
Lifelong NNTP user here. I participate in other web forums and have nothing against them in general, but those are all pretty much 'hobby' forums.
I don't know how much time or control Adobe had over picking the forum replacement. This seems like decent software that just needs to abandon some silly components for some effective ones.
So hopefully over the next month they'll be made more usable.
My biggest complaint, however, is slowness. Adobe's servers were never fast. Putting heavy web forum processing on top...well, it's as expected. What ever happened to the minimum wait time for web content?
I'll still try to participate but the volume definitely won't be as heavy as it used to be. I still like to help where I can...but I can't afford to double/triple the time.
So here's to hoping that these web forums will be made efficient and, someday, NNTP access will return (because, as noted, it IS possible).
Erik
I'm a former NNTP user and, while I'm trying to give the new forums a chance, I find them very clumsy to navigate much less figure out which ones have new topics, etc. I expect my usage will continue to taper off.
Instead of sending email, I used the direct phone number in the email of the "Demand Center Representative" and discussed this with him.
I hope this avenue of "feedback" will bear some fruit.
My 2$ (inflation) -- bring back NNTP.
Yes, bing it back. BTW, there are other Adobe groups on the USENET. I'll be just using those. Bye!
Yes - I would agree - the web is really a very inefficient interface for newsgroups when compared to newsreaders. I don't have the time to waste on this interface - slows me down too much - so for now the only time I will be checking in on any of these forums is when a new release of LR or other products is available so I can determine if there are problems with it that might warrant waiting....
Listen up Adobe - get the provider to turn on the capability that is there with this software - otherwise you will lose a large # of readers who don't want to/refuse to slog through this web interface.
--Scott Jacobs
I am really an outsider in this discussion, as I have always used a browser to accede these forums (which, by the way, makes me in no way happy with the new forums). However, I have some related information that may be important to know.
For the last year or so, I have been watching closely what happened in the forums in Spanish. These were really two subforums: the ex-Adobe ones, and the ex-Macromedia (ex-MM) ones, although they were never called so.
Nearly everyone using the ex-Adobe ones used browsers and so never knew or cared about the NNTP problem. Users of the ex-MM were another story. First, almost all of them used NNTP access. Second, for reasons too long to explain here (and not fully known by me), for years there were no moderators of any kind in there, and almost no interventions of Adobe personnel in the forums. And third, and because of all this, they developed a strong feeling of a close community, considering their "newsgroup" as independent of Adobe. They never accepted that it was really an Adobe forum, and only thanked Adobe for providing the hosting for theit independent newsgroup.
Well, to make the story short, when they heard the news that the change of the forums would end the NNTP support, they protested violently (in their newsreader and in Spanish; i.e, where nobody from Adobe was likely to read their protests), and most of the regulars announced they were never coming back. And, as far as I can say (their messages appear now posted by "Newsgroup_User" and I can't recall all their names), none of them has come back and, most probably, none will evercome back. In the last few hectic days, there were several messages suggesting they opened their own newsgroup, and for all I know, they may have succeeded.
Compared with the number of participants in the forums in English, I am talking of a small groupd of users, so their absence is not likely to worry Adobe . They were, however, very active, and served a useful service to the Spanish speaking community of ex-MM users. I doubt they will be easily replaced.
We need a *user* forum. Adobe is going to continue to jerk us around on this company-controlled clunker.
Best,
Christopher
well I can't find any reply button on the page this email refers me to, not
very user friendly is that?
so I am attempting to reply by email
Here goes:
my new ISP (Comcast) has discontinued support for NNTP, formerly I signed on
with Bellsouth
I found a free service: freenews.netfront.net
and have re-joined alt.graphics.photoshop
If most of you NNTP readers will join I know we can make it better..as of
now only a few cranky old guys and a couple of long time regulars are left
over there & unmoderated will mean using your blocker options more often for
the jerks trolls and spammers
Look forward to seeing some of you over there
(KatWoman)
not logged in = no reply button visible
have to go to front and login even though I have automaticially remember me selected
UGH one more petty annoyance
'Remember me doesn't keep you logged in, just fills in your user name.
alt.graphics.photoshop -- that's where I go most of the time. It's much more convenient.
> We need a *user* forum. Adobe is going to continue to jerk us around on this company-controlled clunker.
For ColdFusion there is alt.comp.lang.coldfusion. It used ot get a reasonable amount of traffic but in all honesty these days it's almost dead - in fact up until recently I usually pointed anyone that posted there to these forums instead (which obviously I won't do any more).
Maybe the CF crowd could migrate over there and get some traffic going again. I definitely still check it every day (more than once), and will continue to help out there where I can, if people post there.
--
Adam
For a *user* forum to be successful, all the Adobe products should be included, similar to the way NNTP worked before Adobe broke it.
Best,
Christopher
Another one gone if NNTP does not come back. Apart from the fact that my personal work-flow is better off with newsreader access, they way this transition was handled was ... sub-optimal.
Claudio González wrote:
so their absence is not likely to worry Adobe . ... I doubt they will be easily replaced.
And the same will happen with NNTP users. They are generally the most computer-literate users (newbies can't figure NNTP out) and thus often had the most to offer the new users. Many hosts used NNTP exclusively. I wonder how many of them will be quitting?
This is just a test message. When I reply via email, it get posted as
a completely blank message.
I will NOT change my email default from 'quote message'. With a
separate forum server it was easy to change the defualt. For this post
I deleted all original content first.
Two other glitches -
Any message that I post (whether via the website or email) doesn't
get emailed back to me. This is probably by design!
Can't find a way to post via email except as a reply.
- Herb
Any message that I post (whether via the website or email) doesn't get
emailed back to me. This is probably by design!
Sure is, and a lot of people have complained about it. It will be put right,
we've been told.
Can't find a way to post via email except as a reply.
Send mail to an address like
discussions-community-general-forum_comments@mail.forums.adobe.com (for this
forum), using the email address you have registered with the forums. The
address is given on the Mailing lists page under your profile. You have to
subscribe to notifications from the forum of choice for the posting address to
appear.
Noel
I've been a regular reader since the late 1990's (Adobe lists 2002). I haven't been able to offer much help but I've learned a lot over the years.
So long
I am been a regular user of a variety of Adobe-related NNTP forums since 2000 which helped me learn and build my creative business. This new forum completely sucks and refuse to use it....sure, prolly my loss but the new points system really bugs me....there were already post-whores with vested interest in selling their components, but I could filter them in my NNTP reader. The perpetual login of the new forums and clunkiness totally suck.
4-6 of Adobe products are the conduit for the success of my business today, but now I just use Google to find a solution to my issues. But, I miss being able to help when I can but refuse to do it in the new format.
Welcome back.
Sign of the times I guess. Add insult to injury my internet provider no longer supports RSS feeds in order to save money or so they say.
I am logging in to remove email notifications from various threads/forums and...
...to say that I will not likely ever post here again. By coincidence, a powerfully helpful forum user announced his exit today in another thread - I will miss reading his posts.
I am ever the optimist, but Jive and Adobe have had more than 90 days - since this forum went live - to fix some very minor issues with the email interface that might have been enough to keep me here. Today I hit a final straw with a very simple email issue that is nearly four months old and just cannot deal with this place anymore. It is not even feasible as a good place to lurk and learn anymore. I would not have given ANY OTHER failure of a site/forum/newsgroup more than a few cursory attempts. But I really enjoy using Adobe products and had high hopes for the new forum - even without NNTP access.
As a loyal customer of both the old Macromedia and Adobe products, I will continue to use the software as long as it remains innovative - or at least somewhat competitive. I learned an awful lot from both of the newsgroups over the years, but I just can't waste any more of my time here.
And all this coming from somebody who is semi-retired and still doesn't have a real life.
--
Mark A. Boyd
Keep-On-Learnin' :-)
This message was processed and edited by the most pathetic Jive software.
It shall not be considered an accurate representation of my words.
Sad news indeed. Thank you for your gargantuan efforts to made this mess of a forum palatable with the scripts, Mark.
This seems like a good time for me to stop logging in again as well.
Not cool, Adobe, not cool at all! I was never an NNTP user but I know for a fact other high volume posters have dropped out as well, they just vanished shortly after the Jiving of the forums.
Mark A. Boyd wrote:
This message was processed and edited by the most pathetic Jive software.
It shall not be considered an accurate representation of my words.
Thanks for the laugh, it's so true.
Pretty soon all we'll have left are people complaining, and people complaining about the complainers. ![]()
Ansury wrote:
...and people complaining about the complainers.
Too true! Several names come to mind ![]()
Just a couple of final related notes.
1. As far as I can tell, none of the many and very active participants of the ex-MM forums in Spanish, all of them NNTP users, have come back on a regular basis, although a few have done so very occasionally. I think this suggests they don't need these forums as they are. Perhaps they formed their own newsgroup, as they formed group with a high degree of cohesion, but have no way of knowing.
2. Private groups can be successful. Here is a link to a Chilean one that has been active for many years. Although it's in Spanish, it gives an idea of their work even if one does not understand the words. The group started as a Macromedia one, centered mainly on Freehand if I remember correctly, and managed to survive extremely well the absorption of Macromedia by Adobe.
this is the group I went back to
it is not very active
we could use some new blood.................
comp.graphics.apps.photoshop
Copyright © 2011 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All rights reserved.
Use of this website signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use and Online Privacy Policy (updated 07-14-2009).