Skip navigation

Problems with Indesign 5.5 (plugins)

Jun 4, 2011 7:59 AM

  Latest reply: Peter Spier, Mar 21, 2013 10:27 AM
Replies 1 2 3 Previous Next
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jun 16, 2011 1:00 PM   in reply to Bob Levine

    No...never have.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jun 16, 2011 1:47 PM   in reply to c.teter

    Another instance of CS5.5?

     

    That doesn't sound right.

     

    Are you sure it's not opening CS5 instead of CS5.5?

     

    Harbs

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jun 16, 2011 1:55 PM   in reply to Harbs.

    I'm double checking now.  Also appears I've lost my snippet library as it will no longer recognize it.  Having some issues here...

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jun 24, 2011 4:48 PM   in reply to guido.bissig

    I had this exact same problem today with a file I just worked on four days ago that guido on the 4th was having. I went online to Adobe to get the latest update of the CS5.5 and I still had the same problem. It wasn't until I hovered over the icon in the dock that I realized I had a CS5 icon on the dock, not the CS5.5.  They both once were there but I decided to smoke one and leave the other. Problem was I apparently ditched the wrong one.  They are identical so hence my mistake. All this supports the bad idea of using CS5 to open a CS5.5 document.

     

    This also supports the idea that computers are dumb and people can be dumber. All troubleshooting techies will tell you to check the nut behind the keyboard.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 6, 2011 10:49 AM   in reply to guido.bissig

    Got the same error today, I guess someone sent me a file in InDesign 5.5, but I only have 5.0.  This is pretty annoying.  1) Instead of a missing plugin error, you'd think that the program would be able to tell you why you are getting the error, and 2) files from a program with the same version number should play nice with each other instead of forcing everyone to upgrade.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 6, 2011 1:31 PM   in reply to apreble

    Really Adobe?!? Really?

     

    As it is I have a client that uses CS2, so I have to keep a copy of indesign3, 4 and 5 just to be able to interact with them. Even then they get an export, that I can't open to make sure it works. Now I suppose I'll need 5.5 and all the previous versions. At least tell me 5.5 can be exported directly to 4, or am I going to need all four indesgn installs?

     

    Very Quark like behaviour.

     

    Oh, and thanks for the useful error message, who could have predicted that someone might try and open the file with older software? Why you'd have to be some kind of soothsayer…

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 6, 2011 1:42 PM   in reply to Niles Ridgeman

    CS5.5 IDML can be opened in CS5 and CS4.

     

    Bob

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 6, 2011 2:40 PM   in reply to Bob Levine

    The IDML file from InDesign 5.5 is crashing my installtion of InDesign.  It appears to start importing links but gets hung up around the same place.  Would a corrupt link be causing this error? I tried moving all of the links to see if that helps, but then it won't even start the import process.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 6, 2011 4:44 PM   in reply to Bob Levine

    ADOBE

    (yಠ,ಠ)y

    Y U NO MAKE *INDD FILES RETROCOMPATIBLE!

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • John Hawkinson
    5,511 posts
    Jun 25, 2009
    Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 6, 2011 9:56 PM   in reply to apreble

    The IDML file from InDesign 5.5 is crashing my installtion of InDesign.  It appears to start importing links but gets hung up around the same place.  Would a corrupt link be causing this error? I tried moving all of the links to see if that helps, but then it won't even start the import process.

    Are you running InDesign 7.0.4 (the current version)? What operating system?

    A corrupt link is not likely to cause this.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 6, 2011 10:43 PM   in reply to John Hawkinson

    It was a corrupt tif file.  The last several tif files of the package were corrupted (wouldn't open in Photoshop or any other program), and once I replaced them with good versions of the files, the IDML file imported/loaded fine.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • John Hawkinson
    5,511 posts
    Jun 25, 2009
    Currently Being Moderated
    Jul 6, 2011 11:44 PM   in reply to apreble

    Well, good for you. I am glad I said "not likely" instead of "impossible"...

     

    But I am confused. You said it would not import your IDML at all if the links were missing (because you moved them all aside)? That is not at all normal -- normally it should skip missing links and note them as missing in the Links panel after the import is complete. Is it possible I'm misinterpreting you?

     

    Otherwise i worry about misdiagnosis...

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Aug 1, 2011 8:05 PM   in reply to YSURE

    Agreed! I just ran into this nonsense trying to open a 5.5 file at home in 5. This file backward incompatibility is ridiculous, and has me ready to jump to another page layout solution.  If it's going to be this way, we should have a way to choose IDML as our default file format. What a total waste of my time. Thanks, Adobe, for making it NOT happen. And, no, I won't be subscribing to anything soon.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2011 7:46 AM   in reply to guido.bissig

    This is INFURIATING, Adobe.  I have to keep every version of Creative Suite back to CS2 on my machine in order to work with my various print suppliers.  To hear now that CS5.5 documents will not open in CS5 makes me want to use an alternative product.

     

    This must be addressed at some point.  I appreciate that there are inconsistencies and new features with each version.  But why can't this be handled like Illustrator?  ie. backsave to an earlier specified version.  Having to backsave to CS4 in InDesign CS5, then open the IDML file in CS4 and backsave to INX, then open up in InDesign CS3...  Totally pathetic for a product that costs thousands and is supposed to be for professionals.  Paaaahhh!!

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2011 7:58 AM   in reply to sibyuk

    Good luck with your search for another professional product that can do what ID can do and allows you to open files in any version. Let us know what you find.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2011 8:04 AM   in reply to sibyuk

    sibyuk wrote:

     

    ...  supposed to be for professionals.

     

    I am a professional user of InDesign and I've never had to backsave. Perhaps because I only deal with other professional users of InDesign.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2011 8:37 AM   in reply to [Jongware]

    And professional printers.

     

     

     

    Bob

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • John Hawkinson
    5,511 posts
    Jun 25, 2009
    Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2011 8:53 AM   in reply to [Jongware]

    Umm, Jongware?

    I am a professional user of InDesign and I've never had to backsave. Perhaps because I only deal with other professional users of InDesign.

    Isn't it a bit more likely that it's because you're still stuck on...CS4?

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2011 9:09 AM   in reply to guido.bissig

    Woah, claws back in!  My favourite print supplier still uses CS3.  They cannot afford to upgrade every six months in this economy.  I've had to move to a press-ready PDF workflow with them because it is infuriating.  But last-minute, simple edits are not so easy to manage as a result.

     

    I moved away from Quark because InDesign was (and still is, in my opinion) a better product.  But this issue, for me, is the one fly in the ointment.  It's incredibly frustrating and causes all of my, ahem, professional friends to groan in much the same way I do.

     

    Now one of my clients has moved to CS5.5 and I am on CS5 for the time being.  One big headache for everybody concerned.  It is ridiculous.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2011 9:38 AM   in reply to sibyuk

    sibyuk wrote:

     

    Woah, claws back in!  My favourite print supplier still uses CS3.  They cannot afford to upgrade every six months in this economy.  I've had to move to a press-ready PDF workflow with them because it is infuriating.  But last-minute, simple edits are not so easy to manage as a result.

    Every six months? CS3 is what, 5 years old, now. And the upgrade cycle was 18-24 months in those days, not six months, and even now the announced acceleration is to 12-month upgrades. I think it's far more likely they didn't want to shell out for an Intel Mac.

     

    In any case, those of us who need to work with printers who are stuck on CS3 (and yes, I am one of those people, too, for one of my favorite printers who happens to send me a fair amount of work and I need to send back files that they can edit in future) have two choices. Work in CS3 or switch to the PDF workflow. There's really no reason at all why you would want to work in CS5.5 if you have to share the native files with a CS3 user. Did you remove CS3 from your system?

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2011 10:12 AM   in reply to sibyuk

    I don’t do much print work anymore, but if my life depended it, on it I couldn’t tell you what version of InDesign any printer had available.

     

     

     

    If they don’t take PDFs, they don’t get my work. Been that way for years.

     

     

     

    Bob

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Nov 16, 2011 12:44 PM   in reply to John Hawkinson

    Well no, we've upgraded to '5 and '5.5 because of ePubs. And, *of course*, for the very occasional client who insists on handing in self-made documents. A practice, by the way, we at the office strongly discourage. I f you can make a document in InDesign you can create a press-ready PDF (even if it means me hanging on the phone and guiding the client through the required motions).

     

    Personally I like to stick with The Evil I Know, CS4.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 12, 2011 7:57 AM   in reply to Bob Levine

    I am a Professional Printer, as you can see from my screen name, and I am very fed up with the nonstop "pay to upgrade" hoops Adobe is always forcing us to jump through to stay in business.  I have four graphic artists that all have to be upgraded everytime Adobe, Quark, Microsoft, and any other company the produce software that our clients could be using, feels like making a small change to fill their pockets.  We have always taken pride in allowing our customers to be able to make the decision of which software program they want to use because only they know best what suits their needs.  It is almost to the point of having to decide between saying goodbye to a customer or say goodbye to a graphic artist because it takes about a years salary to be constantly upgrading software for upgrades that make silly changes almost nobody will uses just to be able to do basic printing, which is what a majority of professional print consists of.

     

    If the upgrade in a software is not big enough to merit a whole number jump (ie 4 to 5 to 6) then it shouldn't be enough to force us to pay to upgrade. And the trick of saying the fractional upgrade is so monumental that it can't be made backward compatable within a whole number version is purely a money issue and that just isn't right.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 12, 2011 8:04 AM   in reply to ProfessionalPrinter

    While I sympathize with your situation, I think you should take a clue from the post by Jongware just above yours. PDF is the way to go. Tell your clients to submit PDF and the entire problem of version disappears. As a designer I've been submitting PDF for years and wouldn't consider sending native files to a printer anymore. My favorite printer stopped upgrading at CS3, but I send him PDFs from CS5.5 and they have no issues printing those at all.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 12, 2011 8:09 AM   in reply to ProfessionalPrinter

    Sorry, but while I sympathize, software and hardware upgrades are a cost of doing business. And you're either way overpaying for software or way underpaying graphic artists if it takes a year's salary to pay for upgrades.

     

    I concur with Peter and in fact, I couldn't tell you what, if any, version of InDesign a printer has. Any modern (professional) printer should be requesting PDFs.

     

    Bob

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 12, 2011 8:20 AM   in reply to Peter Spier

    We do engourage PDF use whenever possible, but a big part of our clients work on an extreme deadline and forceing them to always provide us an absolute final version PDF for all print items at all hours of the day is not the customer service game we want to play.  Often a voice approval for a small change that is needed can be made and proofed using mobile phones, but only if we have the native file and we make the change. 

     

    I guess it all goes back to the difference between a "therortical" designer and "real life" designer.  Some designers think that it makes them a better person if they have the latest version just to print black ink on white paper and a real life designer can make a masterpiece in Publisher. Which by the way we print beautiful 4-color work directly out of Publisher all the time.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 12, 2011 8:28 AM   in reply to ProfessionalPrinter

    Which simply proves that it’s the artist, not the tool that’s important.

     

     

     

    I admire your dedication to keeping your clients happy and being able to accept all versions of software. But I would caution you about something you said in your original post:

     

     

     

    “…upgrades that make silly changes almost nobody will uses just to be able to do basic printing, which is what a majority of professional print consists of.”

     

     

     

    Many print shops are beginning to see the writing on the wall. Print is not dead but print only is. You should probably be looking into offering digital publishing services as well as traditional print and this is where the newest version of InDesign soars above earlier ones.

     

     

     

    Bob

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 12, 2011 8:30 AM   in reply to ProfessionalPrinter

    Printers who tweak files for designers do everyone a disservice, in my opinion. If there's a problem with how I've prepared a file, I want to know, and I want to knwo waht needs to be done to fix it so it doesn't happen again. If you don't tell the client how to solve problems you're doomed to fixing the same mistakes over and over.

     

    And I don't buy the deadline argument. I've re-submitted many a PDF at the last minute.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 12, 2011 9:16 AM   in reply to Bob Levine

    We are going in that direction.  But what I said was, "if it isn't a big enough change to merit a whole number upgrade, then it shouldn't enough to force us to pay to upgrade."  In other words, make it a real big deal or just make it an in-version upgrade for no charge.  And keep it compatable with others who are using the same whole number version.  It is the incompatability and not being able to open a 5.5 file in 5.0 that causes the biggest issue when we are just doing printing.

     

    This whole issue started when a large customer, who does print on paper only, decided to upgrade from CS3 to CS5 and went to the store and bought the box on the shelf and started working with it and was so excited because they were now up to date with all the printers they work with.  They do enough work to spread around to several of local printers besides us.  Now we all have to upgrade because they bought a box that said CS5 when realy it is CS6 because it is not campatable with CS5, but for some reason Adobe doesn't want to call it CS6. I guess that will cut into their scheduled 2012 upgrade profits.

     

    The whole thing is just a vicious neverending cycle that IS the cost of doing business and cuts in to our profits. Most of the work that really pays the bills and keeps a printng company open is basic printing.  The profits from the basic printing is what allows us to be able to expand into digital publishing which in reality is attempting to take away the need for the basic printing and taking away the jobs of the people that do it. So I get to hire one or two high-priced designers to do digital publishing and am forced to fire the many people that have invested their lives in this printing company. But I guess I should just sit back and say "upgrade your lives people if you want to be part of the modern world and keep working here."

     

    But nobody really cares or wants to hear this. Just shut up and send in $399 for every copy I need to stay up to date.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 12, 2011 9:58 AM   in reply to Peter Spier

    We do let the customers know what the problem is.  We will NOT make major design changes that the artist should be responsible for. But many times, just by pure chance, we see an incorrectly spelled word, or a puctation error or two spaces between word that the artist overlooked.  We are not in the business of proofreading, but sometimes it just falls in your lap and we don't want to go ahead and print it wrong. We will contact the responsible party no matter what time it is if they are on a super tight schedule, but if it is 2 am and they will approve us making the small change without having to get up, get dressed, go to work to make a new PDF, we will go ahead and do it. 

     

    I don't know anything about you and the volume of design work you do, but I would bet almost any amount of money that we do a larger volume of printing than you do designing. And these small but necessary changes happen more than you would ever imagine. Yes a PDF can be edited if made correctly, but still sometimes a single space change can cause reflow or force text out of center and these changes can only be made with changes to native files. We request PDF's and native files for printing. We use the PDF for most work, but the native files are only used when needed.  Our printing practices are not the issue here so I will end this conversation.  The real problem is the constant charging for upgrading without maintaining compatability between versions.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 12, 2011 10:28 AM   in reply to ProfessionalPrinter

    ProfessionalPrinter wrote:

    So I get to hire one or two high-priced designers to do digital publishing and am forced to fire the many people that have invested their lives in this printing company. But I guess I should just sit back and say "upgrade your lives people if you want to be part of the modern world and keep working here."

    Let's turn it around a bit...what exactly have you invested in those print designers? Have you offered to pay for HTML/CSS classes? How about all day seminars that might be held in your area? A Lynda.com subscription perhaps? How about a few good books?

     

    If you have and they haven't taken advantage of it, then shame on them. If on the other hand you've offered none of that then shame on you.

     

    I say this as someone who was print only until a few years ago. I spent hours, days, weeks, months, and years, learning new skills. HTML/CSS for web and EPUB and the new Digital Publishing Suite tools for publishing to iPad, and other tablets, so yes, telling people to upgrade their skill sets is certainly something you encourage.

     

    FWIW, I would estimate that I've gone from 100% print a few years ago to perhaps 5%. IOW, I speak from experience. I'd be starving to death if I remained a print only designer.

     

    Bob

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 12, 2011 11:11 AM   in reply to Bob Levine

    When I made the statement about "forced to fire the many people that have invested their lives in this printing company" I was talking about the skilled technicians that run the press, cut the paper, fold and assemble the books.  If we went form 100% print to 5% print, there is no telling how many people would lose their jobs. 

     

    You sit at your desk and know your world and I sit at my desk and know my world and neither of us can make decisions for the other. I pay for taining, I pay for resources, I pay for hours, days, weeks, months, and collectively years for employees to learn HTML/CSS and other design skills. So don't you snap back with your "holier-than-thou" responses because you are a "Community Professional." The continuing cost of business for items such as software upgrades is a major concern for companies like mine.  We are trying to move into the future of digital publishing AND maintain print work so we can keep our employees employed. We have to look at every aspect of the business and un-necessary upgrades is a big part of it. 

     

    No matter what your background is, you will never know what I go through on a daily basis with my business and I will never know what you have to deal with. This has gotten far of the original thread so lets just end it here.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 12, 2011 11:32 AM   in reply to ProfessionalPrinter

    Seems to me you’re the one who came here judging how another company does business but you don’t want anyone else to do the same for you?

     

     

     

    For starters, you totally misread my statement and I suggest you read it again. I asked if you provided those things. I did not accuse of not providing them.

     

     

     

    Secondly, you referred to designers and now all of a sudden it press operators.

     

     

     

    Yes, this has gotten way off topic but it always does when this topic comes up.

     

     

     

    Bob

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 23, 2011 1:44 PM   in reply to Bob Levine

    Wow, I can't belive the replies here.  I'm my company's webmaster/web designer, and I work with my company's graphic designer.  She's on a Mac, I'm on a PC.  She went to 5.5, and I recently upgraded to 5.  I can't simply open her InDesign files to help her out (missing plugins, etc).  It seems like we're constantly having to upgrade.  We do use PDF's when we share outside, but inside, if she's not in to export to a PDF, then I'm trying to access the native file (as in the case of today, where I'm on a deadline, she's out on holiday vacation, and I can't open a file).  Lovely.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 23, 2011 2:28 PM   in reply to delacombo

    I actually don't know why anyone is still surprised by this -- it's hardly been a secret (we posted this information when CS5.5 was released) and at this point it really is old news. I understand your frustration, but if the two of you are going to collaborate, you really need to stay in synch with your versions.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 23, 2011 2:49 PM   in reply to delacombo

    You can believe it or not believe it but it's been that way since InDesign was released. And PDF is not the answer, IDML is. She needs to export to IDML and you can open that.

     

    Normally that's a pretty lousy workflow but the text engines and major print features are pretty compatible in CS5 and CS5.5.

     

    Bob

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 23, 2011 7:16 PM   in reply to Bob Levine

    Don't read entire posts huh? I said shes out on vacation. Yea we all can afford to upgrade every time adobe compiles a few new tools. No skin off my back, as i'm transitioning us to different tools.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 24, 2011 3:09 AM   in reply to delacombo

    If you're in dire straits, one of us, including Bob, will be more than happy to convert a file for you, but you need an attitude adjustment. We're all users here, just like you. Vacations are not the cause of the problem, nor are you forced to upgrade at any time. Upgrading is a choice, as is which version of InDesign you use for any particular project. Every version of InDesign released to date is able to co-exist with every other version on the same system so you needn't remove older versions when upgrading. Thr only thing you cannot do is install regional localizations, like the ME or CE version, on the same machine with the same generation of another localization -- you can't have both both US and ME versions of CS5.5, but you can have CS5 and CS5.5 in any combination you like on the same sytem.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 24, 2011 2:42 PM   in reply to guido.bissig

    But, guys, you are sounding like Adobe apologists here.  Be reasonable.  What is so wrong with asking Adobe to provide us with an option in the save dialogue (and/or the package dialogue) to select an InDesign version to 'make compatible' with?  They manage to do it in Illustrator.  The current workflow – backsaving via IDML, opening in CS4 and checking nothing has gone awry, backsaving via INX, opening it in CS3 to make sure nothing has gone awry – before packaging up in CS3 for a printer is just a total pain in the backside.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Dec 24, 2011 2:52 PM   in reply to sibyuk

    There are technical reasons why that is not possible. The export path, while a pain, is the only option that is doable while keeping the cost of the software low enough for users to afford it. Would you like to pay perhaps ten times more to have a save as button instead of an export? I know most user would not and most users don't need the back saving features at all.

     

    I't pretty hard to believe that iin most files moving from CS5 to CS3 would not result in real problems for printing. The text engines are different enough int he versions that your text is virtually guaranteed to reflow someplace, and of course if you accidentally use any features that were introduced after CS3, those will be lost completely. What you are doing is a disaster waiting to happen. If your printers cannot handle files later than CS3 and won't take PDF (for which version of ID is completely irrelevant), you really need to work in CS3.

     
    |
    Mark as:
Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Answers + Points = Status

  • 10 points awarded for Correct Answers
  • 5 points awarded for Helpful Answers
  • 10,000+ points
  • 1,001-10,000 points
  • 501-1,000 points
  • 5-500 points