Skip navigation

LR 4 seems sluggish

Jan 10, 2012 2:11 PM

  Latest reply: C-OW, Mar 6, 2012 2:11 PM
Replies 1 2 3 2 Previous Next
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 2, 2012 7:50 AM   in reply to Jay Mitchosky

    Me too!    

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 2, 2012 7:56 AM   in reply to dbyj

    Adobe reads threads here, and some known bugs in this area have been mentioned here.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 2, 2012 8:01 AM   in reply to Lee Jay

    They could at least respond and acknowledge the performance issues. They

    are extremely quiet on this issue.  Instead, they talk about maps and books.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 2, 2012 8:24 AM   in reply to Bershatsky

    There's not much to talk about on this issue.  There are performance problems with the beta.  We know that, and they know that.  They have to fix the performance bugs (such as the one that causes massive slowdowns on upgraded images) and optimize as best they can.  Period.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 2, 2012 9:42 AM   in reply to Lee Jay

    I expect more.  Not photo books

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 2, 2012 10:21 AM   in reply to Bershatsky

    Look, I could give a rat's tail end about maps and photo books in this application. It's all fluff that makes me fearful of what kind of stress it's putting on the whole of the engine. But Adobe isn't making the app for just me and the Lightroom team isn't new to this game. This is their 4th major public beta go around and they have had to deal with this every time (especially with the performance issue before it's baked). the performance issue is something that the team knows about, know's that they can't release a final with these problems without all hell coming down on them from every pro (and other) that has to depend on the program managing their lively hood. We all want it to be perfect out of the box... the thing is it hasn't been put in the box yet. The more time they spend managing our issues with a program that we shouldn't be using except for a geeky fun time play toy, the less time they have to actually get the work done. It's perfectly reasonable that they are going to talk about the features that they are still making the recipe for (whether I want those features or not).

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 3, 2012 5:44 PM   in reply to dlimageworks

    Please calm down folks .

     

    Obviously we give the performance (interactive or not) improvements a very high priority internally. A lot of work and bug fixes have gone into the most recent builds. We're seeing good performance test results internally. We're always improving.

     

    -Simon

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 3, 2012 6:46 PM   in reply to simonsaith

    So when is the second beta coming out?

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 3, 2012 6:57 PM   in reply to Bershatsky

    Sorry. Cannot talk about product plans in public forums. But many of the performance issues reported here sounds pretty familiar and have been addressed by the team.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 4, 2012 2:55 AM   in reply to simonsaith

    Simon,

     

    the sluggishness is a problem with LR since version 1 and IMO has very little to do with the beta stadium of LR4. If the sluggishness would be really be adressed, than LR4 would have to be a lot faster than all previous LR versions,.....what I seriously doubt.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 4, 2012 7:12 AM   in reply to klsteven

    Let's be real. Lr 3 is fine

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Feb 4, 2012 8:07 AM   in reply to simonsaith

    Lr4 seems pretty good (for a beta) and most of the performance is comparable to Lr3 (which I find totally acceptable on my system: Core i7-2600 3.4ghz, 16Gb RAM, SSD system disk, 2x1Tb HDD in mirrored RAID array, Radeon HD6850 1Gb). The only sluggish thing is switching modules, e.g. "slideshow" to "print" is very slow.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Mar 6, 2012 2:11 PM   in reply to gnorthridge@msn.com

    So far I could'nt  find any difference to LR3, means same performance. Tried the stamp, brush etc. where others reported bad performance.

    Working on an Core I7 Q 720 @ 1,6GHZ, Win 7 64bit, 6 GB RAM.

     

    Oli

     
    |
    Mark as:
1 2 3 2 Previous Next
Actions

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Answers + Points = Status

  • 10 points awarded for Correct Answers
  • 5 points awarded for Helpful Answers
  • 10,000+ points
  • 1,001-10,000 points
  • 501-1,000 points
  • 5-500 points