Skip navigation
rlr29711 38 posts
Mar 27, 2012
Currently Being Moderated

i7 vs. E5 Xeon

Apr 3, 2012 2:38 PM

Hello,

 

I'm putting together a build for a workstation and am trying to determine the benefits of going with Xeon vs.  i7.  Below are the builds I am looking at   Just as a note, I am switching from Mac and am attempting to build a 'Mac Pro' equivalent :

 

1 E5-2687w 3.1 Ghz (scale up to 2 down the line) 8 cores (16 if two)

 

2x E5-2640 2.5 Ghz 12 cores

 

1 i7 3930k 3.2 Ghz 6 cores

 

I'll be using the following software packages: Avid, After Effects, Resolve, Maya Creation Suite.  I think my biggest concern are rendering and compression times, as well as ability to grade in Resolve.

 

Thanks for the help! Let me know if you need more information.

 
Replies
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 3, 2012 2:50 PM   in reply to rlr29711

    First question: What is your budget for the system, excluding monitors and keyboard?

     

    a. $ 5 - 6 K

     

    b. $ 10+ K

     

    If a., then i7-3930K, if b., then 2 E5-2687W. I would definitely bypass 2 x E5-2640 and 1 E5-2687W.

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 3, 2012 3:00 PM   in reply to rlr29711

    thats easy to answer

    the single Xeon is slower than the others and cant OC.

     

     

    Video material - AVCHD 1080P 24 Frame Each Cut to 30 minutes of material

    Export Codec - H264 HDTV 1080P 24 Preset Default

    4 Effects per Layer - Fast Color Corrector, Brightness & Contrast, Video Limiter, Sharpen

    Each Layer Scaled to 50% for 4 frame PinP view

    X79 3.3 @ 4.5 GHz

    32GB  1333

    580GTX 3GB

    4  1Tb Sata 32 Meg Cache 600 Drives in 2 Raid 0 arrays

    CS5.5.2

    3 Layer - 27:43

    4 Layer - 30:02

     

     

     

    E5 2670 @ 2.6 GHz

    32GB  1600

    570GTX 2.5GB

    4  1Tb Sata 32 Meg Cache 600 Drives in 2 Raid 0 arrays

    CS5.5.2

    3 Layer -

    4 Layer - 40:41  <---loser and way overpriced

     

     

     

     

    I7 3770 4.7 GHz

    16GB Top Power

    570GTX 3GB

    4 WD 1Tb Sata 64 Meg Cache 600 Drives in 2 Raid 0 arrays

    3 Layer -

    4 Layer – 32:58

    Scott

    ADK

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 3, 2012 3:14 PM   in reply to rlr29711

    Forget about the Quadro range. Underspecced, underperforming and overpriced. Go for a GTX 680.

     

    For a raid controller and the rest of the equipment, have a look at a new system I'm planning to build: Planning and building a new NLE system

     
    |
    Mark as:
  • Currently Being Moderated
    Apr 4, 2012 7:12 AM   in reply to rlr29711

    OCing when done correctly is very stable. and yes 100% safe (again when done correctly)

     

    we have a dual Xeon setup here that i think is close to benchmarks time. Eric was out sick yesterday or we would have had #s by now

     

    in the past it always took the very higher end duals to catch up to or finally outperform a single processor OCed system

    at more than 2x the cost plus last gen Xeons you could OC, this go round its not happening. (regardless of what EVGAs website says)

     

    in a non overclocked system the 8 core Xeon 3.1GHz might outperform the 3960? not sure let me extrapolate.

     

    the 2687 will turnbo to 3.4GHz (all cores)

    the stock 3960 will turbo to 3.9GHz (all cores) so right off the 3960 will outperform despite the 2 less cores.

     

    X79 3.3 @ 3.9 GHz (stock turbo)

    16GB  1333

    570GTX

    4 WD 1Tb Sata 64 Meg Cache 600 Drives in 2 Raid 0 arrays

    CS5.5.1

    3 Layer - 31:47

    4 Layer - 34:14

    E5 2670 @ 2.6 GHz  (turbos to 3.0GHz)

    32GB  1600

    570GTX 2.5GB

    4  1Tb Sata 32 Meg Cache 600 Drives in 2 Raid 0 arrays

    CS5.5.2

    3 Layer -

    4 Layer - 40:41

     

    if we take the the numbers we have here. and do some math replacing the 2670 with the 2687s speed i come up with 35:53 still not beating the stock 3960. (used proportional math)

     

    lets try it by %

     

    3.4 is 14% faster than 3

    2441 seconds x 14% -  i get 2075 seconds  34:35  still not faster.. and amounts really to a wash..

     

    $1000 vs $2000 processor and all this at stock.

    $600 3930k @ 4.5GHz kills the Xeon line completely.

     

    Xeons have their place in Animation (serious animation not lower 3rds) not in Premier

     

    lastly +1 what Harm said Quadros are a complete waste of money

     

     

    Scott

    ADK

     

     
    |
    Mark as:

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)

Answers + Points = Status

  • 10 points awarded for Correct Answers
  • 5 points awarded for Helpful Answers
  • 10,000+ points
  • 1,001-10,000 points
  • 501-1,000 points
  • 5-500 points