May want to check out this link (updated for PPRO CS6 and AE CS6: http://www.studio1productions.com/Articles/PremiereCS5.htm

I've been using a GTX460 with CS5.5 for a year now using the technique in the article and the only side effect is that PPRO exports much faster

I don't have AE CS6 installed yet.  I was wondering about that.  From the article, it looks like PPRO and AE may share the same txt file...I'm not sure.  I'm really hoping I can get my card to work with AE.

Todd_Kopriva wrote:

 

The hack won't work for this purpose.

 

Don't waste your time.

 

As I said, we have to do additional engineering work to make the ray-traced 3D renderer work with Kepler-class cards like the GTX 680.

That's what I thought.  No worries.  We're talking about a video card that has barely been out for a month working with a software package that hasn't been out for a week.  Such is life on the bleeding edge

My apologies Todd for making the post. 

BTW, I was told the same thing a couple of years ago with the cards for Premiere CS5 and I haven't heard of any failures with those cards.

Do you know of what cards failed with After Effects cs6?

I have been playing around with the GT 550 Ti and After Effects CS6 with using the ray traced 3D render engine and have been monitoring the video card temps and even on very long renders, then temps on the card are staying well within specs.  They are about the same as they are in Premiere on long renders.

You can respond in a PM if you prefer.  I would really like to hear back from you on this.

Best Regards

Dave Knarr

what is the big difference between the 470 and the 480 dude? Your saying yourself that the 480 didnt make the cut for? Not being an *** dude just wonderin if you know the exact reason as in the 480's test results. Is there anyway you would have an idea for an ETA of compatibility for the 480?

And I would say that is purty dang fair (I do explain that the "hack" will NOT make the card certified. (____Also, I do point out that the GTX680 will NOT work with the "hack"______) At least "you" say that dude. "Hey you can use this "hack" dudes but make sure you read the fine print. Which its in bold but ya get my meaning, rite on?

Dave Bro, I think, personally this is my opinion that "you" sir, are a kind and generous dude, dude! And that I will look to You as well as Adobe MFG. for opinionated values and points like as in Guru3D. Thats how I roll.

If you ( or Your "Boss" in my case) pay money for an upgrade to something that you have already paid for from the start ;-) -----> and it works fine with all the "components" you have prior to the upgrade, the mfger..... should have most of those bugs out in a BETA release (notice = I said "most" right there dudes). I see that a lot where games are released before "we will sell no whine, before its time" kinda thing. The GTX 680 thing I can definately understand, its an unfamiliar architecture. And also to boot, i have to give Adobe a thumbs up cause they had a fix for the 480 shortly after it was released, im just an impatient dude. But in all seriousnees y'all have a worldly population working at "Adobe" dudes. For real and shtuff  :-D

I'm gonna hold out on the CS6 until Adobe sort out this issue out!! So I'll be sticking with CS5.5 for while longer....

Besides ray tracing. Do Kepler cards work fine in AE and Premiere? I'm experiencing ~15fps playback on my I7-3820  in AE with only warp stabilizer... I do have a Radeon card which I want to upgrade but I really don't want to buy an "old" GTX 570 or 580.

Adobe added raytracing support for nivide 680 gtx cards today! well done Adobe!

No love yet for the 670? I'm jonesing for 3D-accelerated extruded text to send zooming around the screen!

My GTX 680 is running perfect!! Thanks for the Good Job!

how about gtx 670 it's work too ?

thanks

Hey, Todd
When added to the list of Quadro K4000