Adobe Community: Message List - Developer forum

Re: Liquid IF and UNLESS doesn't work in modules/content holders?

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:19:32 GMT

Hi Lynda,

From the description of your setup it looks like the wholesaler variable is not available in the context of the content holder or layout. Take a look at this article - Passing custom parameters to modules and pass the value of the wholesaler variable to the contentholder module using a custom parameter, something like

{module_contentholder id="123" myCustomParameter="{{wholesaler}}"}

whoch in the content holder context should be available in:

Re: New Editor (redactor) On Admin Bugs List

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 13 Nov 2014 07:40:54 GMT

Yes this spacing after a url is playing havoc with our clients as well.

Liquid IF and UNLESS doesn't work in modules/content holders?

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 13 Nov 2014 07:20:16 GMT

I have the following liquid code in a template:

{% case item.zoneId %}

{% when '13435' %}

{% assign wholesaler = 'True' %}

{% when '51' %}

{% assign customer = 'True' %}

{% endcase %}

Then elsewhere I have the following liquid:

{% if wholesaler == 'True' %}

<p>Text to display for wholesale secure zone.</p>

{% endif %}

{% unless wholesaler == 'True' %}

<p>Text for everyone else.</p>

{% endunless %}

The above code works great if inserted into a page. If I insert the code into a content holder and/or a layout (in my case the Large Product Layout) it doesn't work.

I assume this is simply a limitation currently but I thought I would ask in the event it could be a bug.

Thoughts?

Re: New Editor (redactor) On Admin Bugs List

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 13 Nov 2014 06:10:26 GMT

Hyperlink Spacing Bug:

This bug has been around for a while, it actually happens wherever redactor is implemented, even in Email Campaigns with Visual Editor enabled.

Whenever you insert a hyperlink using redactor (or even build it in a campaign template), the space between the hyperlink and the following word get stripped, you even go in HTML and add the space again, save, come back and it's gone.

You'll have to add the non-breaking space in HTML manually after every hyperlink to ensure it stays. This is definitely not ideal for Email Campaigns with Visual Editor enabled nor for the overall representation in the entire platform having redactor across all modules.

I hope this can be prioritised asap as for clients with no HTML knowledge, this just gonna be a turn off.

I think Imperavi pushed an update on v10+, we are using the latest version in our custom Apps and we don't have this issue. The only hassle with upgrading to v10 is that Imperavi have made a LOT of changes to the markup and even the Callbacks with classes and IDs in CSS changes on top of that. I guess an upgrade will see you guys changing all the custom plugins you have already built, but fixes may also be as frustrating?

Anyway, I'll leave it in your hands.

Re: Bug List thread

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:52:35 GMT

This will probably been when I went two levels down and tired to pass when inside another collection.

Re: Bug List thread

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:01:55 GMT

Scott Shefler wrote:

{module_webappscount id="Properties" filter="classified" itemId="/Properties/States/Texas" collection="collectionName" template=""} DOES NOT WORK

{module_webappscount id="Properties" filter="classified" itemId="123456" collection="collectionName" template=""} DOES WORK

I know you can just do this {module_webapps id="Properties" filter="classified" itemId="/Properties/States/Texas" collection="collectionName" template=""} {{collectionName.items | size}} or {{collectionName.items.size}}

But again the documentation is inaccurate and indicates the above should work So should add the ability to put named categories for {module_webappscount} or on the documentation should indicate that you can only use ID for classified as and or give the preferred method of getting a web app count which now might be just outputting the {module_webapps} and do either {{collectionName.items | size}} or {{collectionName.items.size}}.

Hey Scott.

This is indeed a bug. itemId parameter should accept either the category Id or the qualified category name. We've logged it and fixed it, should catch the next release.

Thanks for the bug report!

Re: Bug List thread

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:29:43 GMT

Hey Scott.

Scott Shefler wrote:

Doesn't look like you can currently pass the data source Id into a module web app tag through a collection. When I inserted the same module tag but hard coded the ID in then it works and If I try to just output the data source id outside of the module tag it works but not within the module tag. See below:

{module_webapps id="Properties" filter="all" hideEmptyMessage="true" collection="map" template=""}

{% for item in map.items %}

{{item.['Property Type_id']}} DOES WORK

{module_webapps,25542,i,{{item.['Property Type_id']}},,,,,true template="/ModuleTemplates/WebApps/PropertiesTypes/name.tpl"} DOES NOT WORK

{module_webapps,25542,i,7439185,,,,,true template="/ModuleTemplates/WebApps/PropertiesTypes/name.tpl"} DOES WORK

{% endfor %}

Also, I second what Liam said about having an option not to choose a selection from the data source in the web app. I have brought this up several months ago as what would seem like an easy update that is very crucial.

This is a limitation of the engine. If you want to pass liquid parameters to a module, you have to use named parameters, otherwise this will not work (outputting liquid data in modules using old module syntax - with coma will not work).

{module_webapps id="25542" filter="item" itemid="{{item.['Property Type_id']}}" ....} whould work just fine.

Re: Major Bug: CRM Import and Date Custom Field

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:38:24 GMT

Hi Robert,

We are actually looking to use ISO date format in liquid and JSON.

Cristinel

Re: Checking Contents of Shopping Cart using Liquid

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:16:25 GMT

You need none of this.

If you do the code within the specified template for the cart that already exists, even with liquid - BC has the stuff in place and it will update.

If you are doing the cart information through a collection, outside of this scope, all you need to do, say with jQuery is the simple .load and partial refresh a page (google, easy to find) and you would need to hook into that on times say add to cart is fired.

Re: Checking Contents of Shopping Cart using Liquid

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:29:54 GMT

A little Ajax would do the trick. Just retrieve the same page via Ajax, and inspect the contents for the cart.

Re: Checking Contents of Shopping Cart using Liquid

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 04:18:19 GMT

That is fine for my purpose. I just want to know what is in their cart on page load. If they add items after page load that is okay.

Re: Checking Contents of Shopping Cart using Liquid

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 04:10:18 GMT

BC allows the cart to change without an associated page load, so if you could get the cart data through Liquid it may not always be accurate.

Checking Contents of Shopping Cart using Liquid

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 04:06:40 GMT

Using Liquid is it possible to check what items are in the shopping cart? If so can someone point me in the right direction?

Basically what I am looking to achieve is when a page loads check to see if certain items are in the shopping cart. If they are in the shopping cart I do something otherwise I do something else. If I can check quantities, even better.

I am still working to grasp everything liquid. =>

Re: Major Bug: CRM Import and Date Custom Field

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Tue, 11 Nov 2014 23:49:58 GMT

Hi Lucian,

Yes the site is on the beta engine, I have sent you a second email with site name and a test spreadsheet to use (as you haven't received the first one). Please let me know if the second email doesn't come through.

Tarik.

Re: Major Bug: CRM Import and Date Custom Field

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:34:36 GMT

I wish BC had gone with ISO 8601 as the standard date string format. There's no ambiguity.

Re: Major Bug: CRM Import and Date Custom Field

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:57:44 GMT

Hi Lucian,

I just sent you an email with details.

Thanks.

Re: Major Bug: CRM Import and Date Custom Field

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:55:01 GMT

Hey Tarik.

Is this on a site in beta (4.5 site)?

Major Bug: CRM Import and Date Custom Field

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:06:50 GMT

Hi Guys,

This one really got me working but few tests proves it's a major bug that needs fixing asap I guess?

Two major issues here: (Custom Field Date & Time)

Issue 1:

1. I added a Date & Time Custom field to the CRM

2. Using a CSV file through Import/Advanced, I had the date 02-Jan-2010

3. The field in the CRM shows 01-Feb-2010

Issue 2:

Some records in the CRM had already dates filled in "this custom Date & Time" field.

If we try to update the records due to a change, the field simply becomes blank regardless of what we do.

Can you guys look into this please?

Thanks

Re: Does CRM API v3 support Extended CRM fields at this time?

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:47:21 GMT

Hi Karim (and all),

I've added this request as an idea. You can able to vote on it now: Extended CRM fields API v3

Cristinel

Re: BC.Next Requests

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Mon, 10 Nov 2014 02:59:13 GMT

thanks stephen,

yeah .. the json flag is an alternative option but I still have to run a secondary load to pull it in and then have to wait for the data to become available before I can run any scripts that are dependant.

Re: BC.Next Requests

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:50:12 GMT

Hi Gary,

I like your ideas here, having a repository of JSON data auto created by BC sounds like a handy idea.

I’ve been using a similar concept by almost including all my Liquid code inside /_System/includes/ and inside this folder I place specific “functions” and random resources to create collections and run specific tasks. It’s not 100% ideal, it’s a manual process, but it works (at times).

What Liam was suggesting is you can get a JSON output on whatever page you’re after by simply applying &JSON=true at the end of the html page (I’m sure you were always aware of this). But this is not what you were after, I know.

Re: BC.Next Requests

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Mon, 10 Nov 2014 01:14:48 GMT

I’m not sure if you understood my question Liam.

I want to access the JSON data but NOT have it print in the HTML. Hence why I was asking if we could have some facility to push the JSON to localStorage on the server, or special a JS variable.

Pushing the {{this}} && {{globals}} to a page variable allows me to access the data from an external js file.

Editor fixes should be a bit of a priority

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Sun, 09 Nov 2014 22:47:45 GMT

Hey BC team,

I know you are flat out with a million and one things to do, but I think the editor needs to be a bit of a priority in addressing the issues and some of the bits missing from it.

Why?

For you, it may not seem a priority over liquid, API things etc, but since you guys have set BC.Next live for new stuff, especially with Muse people are using the editor to make content and having a variety of issues, many already covered as bugs and issues in the developer forums. This is an issue.

I have seen several forum threads in just the last two week in regard to the editor, I first was telling people they turned on the beta, most had not and I realised and remembered the cases you guys have all this on. Such people will not be using liquid and so wont encounter those issues, but the extra paragraphs and breaks, a few missing features, the class dropdown not working and the other bugs and issues are causing people issues.

Re: Does CRM API v3 support Extended CRM fields at this time?

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Sun, 09 Nov 2014 22:14:23 GMT

I agree as well. We've been using Extended CRM fields with clients and need to be able to utilize the API's to further enhance their experience.

Re: Does CRM API v3 support Extended CRM fields at this time?

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Sun, 09 Nov 2014 17:35:27 GMT

I just wanted to add my support for this as well. The extended CRM fields feature is one of the most powerful things about BC and one of those things that makes it stand out compared to other options. So I hope better support for it is planned as a top priority.

Re: Bug List thread

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:20:04 GMT

Doesn't look like you can currently pass the data source Id into a module web app tag through a collection. When I inserted the same module tag but hard coded the ID in then it works and If I try to just output the data source id outside of the module tag it works but not within the module tag. See below:

{module_webapps id="Properties" filter="all" hideEmptyMessage="true" collection="map" template=""}

{% for item in map.items %}

{{item.['Property Type_id']}} DOES WORK

{module_webapps,25542,i,{{item.['Property Type_id']}},,,,,true template="/ModuleTemplates/WebApps/PropertiesTypes/name.tpl"} DOES NOT WORK

{module_webapps,25542,i,7439185,,,,,true template="/ModuleTemplates/WebApps/PropertiesTypes/name.tpl"} DOES WORK

{% endfor %}

Also, I second what Liam said about having an option not to choose a selection from the data source in the web app. I have brought this up several months ago as what would seem like an easy update that is very crucial.

Re: Bug List thread

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Fri, 07 Nov 2014 14:14:14 GMT

{module_webappscount id="Properties" filter="classified" itemId="/Properties/States/Texas" collection="collectionName" template=""} DOES NOT WORK

{module_webappscount id="Properties" filter="classified" itemId="123456" collection="collectionName" template=""} DOES WORK

I know you can just do this {module_webapps id="Properties" filter="classified" itemId="/Properties/States/Texas" collection="collectionName" template=""} {{collectionName.items | size}} or {{collectionName.items.size}}

But again the documentation is inaccurate and indicates the above should work So should add the ability to put named categories for {module_webappscount} or on the documentation should indicate that you can only use ID for classified as and or give the preferred method of getting a web app count which now might be just outputting the {module_webapps} and do either {{collectionName.items | size}} or {{collectionName.items.size}}.

Re: BC.Next Requests

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:21:13 GMT

You have all the page json stuff if you remember Gary. Any page can be set to show its contents as JSON.

faq limit issue when selecting from a specific category.

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:01:33 GMT

Hi,

I am struggling with putting a limit onto FAQ listing when I select it from a category.. the module doesn't give an option to limit when category is selected, it shows all the listing of FAQs when categoty is selected

Please help or if you have an idea to workaround it please let me know.

Thanks

Re: BC.Next Requests

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Fri, 07 Nov 2014 07:12:18 GMT

Is there any possible way have a flag or something to push the page's {{this|json}} && {{globals|json}} to something like localStorage from the server?

This would allow us to access the data array in external JS files without have to render the json data in html on the page.

Or is there currently another trick to achieve the same effect?

Re: Bug List thread

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Fri, 07 Nov 2014 05:40:45 GMT

JSON issue:

Pages you create and set as json do indeed render a json output.

But there are some issues with this:

1. jQuery Ajax call where you specify the dataType will fail because the headers are still in html

2. If you have no datatype specified with your jQuery Ajax call it will try to consume the data as json but will again fail because the headers are still html

3. Modules in a page as part of the json do not render, the { is converted into its html entity at the start preventing it to render (BC seems to be escaping it before it realises it is a module and needs to be rendered)

The only way to pass the json is to set the dataType as html.

Re: BC.Next Requests

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 06 Nov 2014 06:44:22 GMT

Paramater passing:

You can pass a parameter into a module list layout, but this will not come through in the detail.

Is it possible to have passed paramaters in the list & Detail view?

Re: Looping and storing into arrays

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 06 Nov 2014 06:00:38 GMT

Well Rob, you have {module_data... So if you want to go even further You can turn to that and you can defiantly do the where. I think bringing that to all modules would be some serious overkill work, you would be basically replicating that functionality.

That is how I am classing _data - This is your hardcore module to use when you want to do some serious s*** but as I have said in other threads, We should not be turning to that all the time when we just need something like categories in list view. That would also be over kill in those situations.

But then when you do use _data it would be good to get some results, map it to an array and then use that for something else.

Re: Looping and storing into arrays

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 06 Nov 2014 05:37:39 GMT

Those would be great.

What I'd really like to see, is basic filters on module_ tags, so we can reduce the set of returned elements before the infernal pagination limit is hit. (Wasn't this already mentioned somewhere?)

E.g., in your example, only the first x hundred webapp items can be looped over to test for classification/name/whatever. We should instead be able to say something like {module_webapp collection="myitems" where="item.classificationName EQ foobar"}, so we'll get matching items even though they wouldn't have appeared in the first page of unfiltered results.

Re: Bug List thread

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 06 Nov 2014 05:33:54 GMT

{module_webapps id="12312" filter="all" resultsPerPage="30" hideEmptyMessage="true" render="collection" collection="myCollection" template=""}

When you run a module as a collection it creates white space markup in your code.

Html:

It has not been used yet but you can see it renders a white space which effects your markup appearance.

Looping and storing into arrays

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 06 Nov 2014 05:27:12 GMT

Anyone managed this yet, or BC team - you got any thoughts....?

There could be cases and situations like this one and in this case either a solution or just having a loop array filter would be nice also...

Issue:

You have a web app with classifications. You want to people in a company. You want to show board members (Classification) in one section and the rest of the team in another.

The Rest of the team will show the board members because you do not have classifications in list view.

Solution 1:

BC to provide classifications in list view liquid/collection

Solution 2: (And something we probably may need too)

It would be great to loop through a collection and store into an array

{% assign myarray = [] -%}

{module_webapp collection="myitems"}

{% for item in myitems-%}

{% myarray | map: item.name-%}

{% endfor -%}

It would be handy to be able to store items in an array. You can already map an array, have a manually made array you can loop through, have a string you map into an array via a cookie etc.

Re: Bug List thread

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 06 Nov 2014 04:47:20 GMT

Collection Item issue:

You can get the size of a collection - theCollection.items.size - Like with other things though this returns a string. You would expect a number so you can use it and apply math to it.

Re: Bug List thread

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 06 Nov 2014 04:25:58 GMT

Admin / Collection conflict issue:

When you grab a module in the admin and insert it, the field for number of items is set to 10.

When you insert the module by default it does not include the property for resultsPerPage. It only does when you put in a new value into the field.

When you try using collection/render etc no items are returned because it requires resultsPerPage.

Fix Suggestion:

by default results PerPage should include a value, this would save some hassles.

Re: Bug List thread

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 06 Nov 2014 03:24:26 GMT

Another solution would be to use the following:

{module_secureurl includeProtocol="true" URLencode="true" collection="my_custom_collection_name" template=""}

Re: Bug List thread

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 06 Nov 2014 03:10:40 GMT

Hi, hope this hasn't been mentioned before but here goes...

Found a bug when adding new {module} tags into HTML tag attributes and editing inside the online editors.

When passing {modules}:

{module_secureurl includeProtocol="true" URLencode="true"} << --- correct

{module_secureurl includeProtocol='true' URLencode='true'} << ---- incorrect

When passing modules inside an HTML tag attribute such as <form action="">:

<form action='{module_secureurl includeProtocol="true" URLencode="true"}/FormProcessv2.aspx'> << --- works

<form action="{module_secureurl includeProtocol='true' URLencode='true'}/FormProcessv2.aspx'> << --- broken

However, when a customer edits the form or page or contentholder etc (I may end up using {% include %})

You cannot have use single quotes for attributes in the online editors where clients visit as the editor converts <form action='/FormProcessv2.aspx'> to <form action="/FormProcessv2.aspx">

So you have to use old school {module_secureurl,includeProtocol,URLencode} instead of {module_secureurl includeProtocol="" URLencode=""}

Proposed solutions:

Either allow {module_secureurl includeProtocol='true' URLencode='true'} to render correctly, or

Allow single quotes in the new editor. <form action='/FormProcessv2.aspx'> or

Both.

Thanks

Stephen

Re: BC.Next Requests

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Thu, 06 Nov 2014 01:39:05 GMT

Re: Bug List thread

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:11:40 GMT

I have a web app with two image custom fields.

This is the output:

You can see that the second custom image field has basically spazzed out and it just renders html and set's its source as the first one. It was not doing this before, this appears to be a new bug.

- This occurs if the second custom image field is blank

- If the secondary custom field has an image it renders normally.

What I expect to be happening:

- Custom image field values should be blank (empty)

Re: BC.Next Requests

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 05 Nov 2014 22:00:57 GMT

mything="{{company.phone}}" then in the module..

Re: BC.Next Requests

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 05 Nov 2014 22:00:21 GMT

You can pass as a variable into those modules scott

Re: BC.Next Requests

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 05 Nov 2014 21:36:06 GMT

Can we get the {module_json} file to render inside content holders/modules from placing it on the template. For example we have a json file that is storing all company information like phone, adddress, etc. Would be great to be able to add {module_json json="/_System/Json/company.json" template="" collection="company"} to each template then from anywhere we can call {{company.phone}}

Right now it only works to call {{company.phone}} from on the template itself or within a page. Not from within content holders or modules.

Re: BC.Next Requests

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:23:29 GMT

It is documented Scott, but like the BC module date, BC actually does not expose the server date in the system. I am not sure why, I forgot what Cristinel told me now. As you know the module just renders some javascript and string date for the users date / time.

What do you think of the type idea though Scott, that should solve a heap of issues I think.

Trying to use Liquid to filter a Webapp by another Webapps data

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 05 Nov 2014 19:35:29 GMT

Here's the scenario. I have a customer who wants me to build a very simple task system for their employees, where the employer can assign HR related tasks to an employee. The employee would login and see only the tasks assigned to them.

I have a Webapp "Intranet - Employee" and another Webapp "Intranet - Employee Tasks". In the "Intranet - Employee Tasks" Webapp, I have a field with the datasource linked to the Webapp "Intranet - Employee". I have an Secure Zone called "Intranet". I have a page in the Secure Zone titled "Intranet - "Employee".

On the page "Intranet - Employee", I have the following module using Liquid:

{module_webapps id="23727" filter="all" render="collection"}

In the "Intranet - Employee Tasks" Webapp layout, I have the following:

<div class="intranet-task-list-item">

{% for item in items %}

<div class="name">{{item.name}}</div>

<div class="intro">{{item.['task intro']}}</div>

<div class="type">{{item.['task type']}}</div>

{%endfor%}

</div>

This works fine. It shows all of the tasks, not just the ones assigned to the logged in employee. Now I want to filter by the user that's logged in.

This module call gets the Item Id I want to filter by:

{module_webappscustomer id="23725" filter="all" useBackupTemplate="true"}

In the "Intranet - Employee" Webapp backup template, I have one tag: {tag_itemid}.

Now, how do I filter the second Webapp "Intranet - Employee Tasks" by the Item Id. Here's how I started, but it's not working:

On the page "Intranet - Employee":

{module_webapps id="23727" filter="all" render="collection" emplid="{{module_webappscustomer id="23725" filter="all" useBackupTemplate="true"}}"}

In the "Intranet - Employee Tasks" Webapp layout, I have the following:

<div class="intranet-task-list-item">

{% for item in items %} {%if {{item.['employee_id']}} == this.params.emplid %}

<div class="name">{{item.name}}</div>

<div class="intro">{{item.['task intro']}}</div>

<div class="type">{{item.['task type']}}</div>

<div class="employee">{{item.['employee']}}</div>

<div class="employee id">{{item.['employee_id']}}</div>

<div class="testing for id">testingfor: {{params.emplid}}</div>

{%endif %} {%endfor%}

</div>

Is something like this possible? I've very new to Liquid, so maybe I'm missing something big. If I take out the if statement, I can see that the parameter gets passed to the layout. Also, if I pass a text variable, instead of using the module_webappscustomer ..., the if statement works. But, I cannot get them both the work together.

Do I need to assign a variable first? Is there a better way to link the two Webapps?

Thanks in advance for the help!

Re: BC.Next Requests

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:37:54 GMT

Awesome if this is already possible but if not I would like to request the ability to get the current date and time in globals. Something as simple as getting the current date and filtering out the year for the copyright would be great. I'm sure there are many more use cases for grabbing this kind of information but that is just a small one. I know shopify allows it buy doing something like this {{ 'now' | date: "%Y" }}

Re: New Editor (redactor) On Admin Bugs List

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:28:13 GMT

Thanks Cristinel.

Re: New Editor (redactor) On Admin Bugs List

forums_noreply@adobe.com — Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:25:10 GMT

Nope, but in the same time don't want to duplicate content. We're following all discussions.

Cristinel