• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

small PNG file result in BIG file size

Community Beginner ,
Jan 07, 2018 Jan 07, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I have 2 PNG files, 1 small & the other one is a almost double in size:

820x2188px and 2188x1500px, both 72dpi

both are "save as png" in Photoshop CC 2018

(the file is for printout so I'm not using "save for web" this time)

Logically the 2188x1500 one should get bigger file size, right?

but 2188x1500 results in 772kb, while 820x2188 got 1.51mb, which is unbelievably big

why PNG so big.jpg

the 2 PSD files are made by 2 people, but they both have the same settings.

Does anyone have idea why is the smaller PNG result in bigger file size??

thank you!

Views

4.0K

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Jan 07, 2018 Jan 07, 2018

Please post the two images.

Is the larger one »simpler«, i.e. has less noise, more areas of flat color, …?

Votes

Translate

Translate
Adobe
Community Expert ,
Jan 07, 2018 Jan 07, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Does anyone have idea why is the smaller PNG result in bigger file size??

Aside from the image content itself and how well it compresses a possible culprit is Ancestor Metadata.

Does Save for Web (without the metadata) result in files of expected sizes?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jan 07, 2018 Jan 07, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

just now had tried "save for web" without metadata, file size is the same, still got 1.5mb. I guess metadata is not the reason? but still thank you for your opinion!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 07, 2018 Jan 07, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Please post the two images.

Is the larger one »simpler«, i.e. has less noise, more areas of flat color, …?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jan 07, 2018 Jan 07, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

c.pfaffenbichler  留言

Please post the two images.

Is the larger one »simpler«, i.e. has less noise, more areas of flat color, …?

Sorry due to the confidentiality agreement i have with the company, I can hardly post the 2 images here.
But the larger one is indeed simpler, it contains only 3 colors (green, orange, white) and got more flat color areas.
I tried switching the content in the 2 PNG files and finally got expected file size.

problem solved!

thank you!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Jan 08, 2018 Jan 08, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Compression depends on what is in the original file. Very simple files (all one colour) will be tiny. Files with constant change of colour may not compress at all. So this is entirely normal.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines