LOL, hey there again Mr. Shouty
May I please respectfully disagree with some of the points
you made?
You said:
The problem is that Macromedia (Adobe ... whatever) are
obstinately not working together to sort out the bugs between Flash
& Captivate (and god knows what else).
It's all Adobe now. To be totally fair, they are dealing with
an influx of many new software applications. I'm confident that
they do actually care a great deal about interoperability. To get
there will simply take time. I'm also confident that they would
never intentionally cause applications to misbehave or not work
correctly otherwise. Many have voiced complaints about Captivate
not working well with Flash. But you have to understand that
Captivate was never created initially to do this. Yes, prior to
being known as Captivate, it was known as RoboDemo. And was
massaged and edited and sold by the folks at eHelp corporation. But
even THEY acquired the technology from a different company.
RoboDemo was formerly known as a product called FlashCam. It's come
a long way and has a ways to go yet. I'm sure we'll get there.
Your statement:
I'm sorry it is such a cop-out to hide behind the "it was never
designed to do that", because it was. may sound to you like a
cop out. It further seems to imply that you feel the Adobe
Community Expert group are Adobe employees. We aren't. We are
simple users the same as you. We have just been recognized for
sharing our knowledge and being helpful.
Sorry, but I would have to respectfully disagree that
Captivate was
designed to capture full motion. I would think if this were
the case, it would simply behave in much the same manner as
Camtasia Studio, where it simply begins from the onset as full
motion video. Simply because it worked fine in this manner for
other projects is not really a valid indication. I would contrast
that with using a car as a transport to haul cement. Can it work?
Sure, technically speaking. So simply because it will allow cement
to be poured through the window and it can be driven to a different
location doesn't mean it was designed to do this.
I'm not trying to argue with you, simply offering up an
alternate view of things. And if you honestly feel it's a bug,
please
click
here and report it as such.
Sincerely... Rick