1 person found this helpful
Your system's DPI setting in the display settings.
I have just installed CS5 and am having same problem. Also Win 7. The menu titles and icons in title bar are so tiny they are unreadable. Adjusting dpi size doesn't affect this program atr all. It seems as if Adobe doesn't respond to the usual Windows adjustments? Any ideas? I just can't see the menu titles. It is awful
I have always had my system appearance/display setting set at "Larger" (150%). I did go to the control panel and changed the screen resolution from 1920 x 1080 down to 1360 x 768. That made the tools and menus the correct size. But then all my other programs(and desktop) had huge menus and tools. They were so large that it would be hard to work in those programs. So I set it back to 1920 x 1080 and I'm back to the microscopic tools and menus in Photoshop. Is there anything else that you could recommend? Thanks for your help.
Do you have the trial version of CS5? That is what I am using and I will be getting the disks today. I'm hoping once I install the disks that my tools and menus will get bigger. I did read where you can manually set the dpi to 149% or 151% in your display settings. That didn't help with making the tools any bigger but it did take away the triple cursor problem that I had in Photoshop Elements. If you find a solution, let me know.
I have the full version of CS5. Nothing will change the title bar text. If I play around with my Win7 display settings I can increase the size of everything else, slide bars, menus themselves, palettes, but not Adobe menu titles. Dreamweaver seems the same, it has teeny weeny text and is nearly unreadable.
I am very cross about this, every other program is amenable to being changed within Windows - why not this one?
You can make your other programs stay small by setting your appearance/display setting to 100% when you change the resolution to 1360 x 768
1 person found this helpful
It is a mistake to use any other setting than the monitor's native resolution if you are a serious Photoshop user.
Amen. I have a 30 inch monitor and 66 yr old eyes (and Windows 7). My workflow is constantly interrupted by having to change my seated position and thrust my head forward so that I can read the icons. It's like buying a Ferrari but being unable to adjust the seat. I find it a gross oversight and sleight to users who spend a lot of money to use their product, which supplies multiple options to manipulate the workspace and photographs but no way to adjust the fonts in the workspace.
Have you tried making the menu options larger? Not idea I know, as the menu titles remain ridiculously small.
I used Control panel - App and Personalise - Personalize - change window glass colour - Adv application settings.
Then select from list of Items - Menu and make it larger font type and size (Verdana is nicely spaced for reading on screen). It does make the menu items list much larger.
I also tried Edit/prefs/Interface. UI text = large and I think it made the palette size a bit larger.
The real issue here is why does Adobe not conform to Windows accessibility options. I thought most companies now had to allow for reading problems on screens - I guess they just forgot it!!
Adobe software has the rare characteristic that it is built for BOTH Windows and Apple environments. Under the covers, Adobe has "rolled its own" controls, coded in a system-nonspecific manner.
This has both good and bad sides.
The good side is that it's one of the most consistent products between the platforms that you will find. If you are good at using Photoshop on a Mac and you are placed in front of a Windows system, chances are you'll be good at using Photoshop on that system as well.
That bad side is that Adobe may not keep up with the latest "trends" in window management by Microsoft. To their credit, Microsoft has been working to make the Windows environment more usable by creating things like the ability to size up virtually everything on the display. This is not accomplished in one fell swoop, but by making the myriad different controls and visual elements sensitive to the chosen settings.
See where I'm headed here?
Adobe, while creating an environment that has certain advantages for them, has also created an environment that has certain assumptions built in - like what size things will be rendered on the display, and this environment is also very vast, embodying all the Adobe products.
Adobe apparently has not chosen to migrate their UI controls along with the new Microsoft directions - which by any measure aren't consistent even in themselves (just look at the UI for WordPad in Windows 7 if you want an example). Adobe might also have made the judgment that if they were to tweak their controls they'd unleash a whole new realm of user problems, both because they had to touch a lot of code, and because now there's a whole new layer of complexity that covers virtually everything.
Even today on some systems people report not being able to see all the numbers in the edit boxes. Imagine if all those UI elements were made variable...
I'm not justifying Adobe's approach, but I can say (as a developer myself) I do understand it.
1 person found this helpful
Big mistake by Adobe – and maybe illegal.
Aren't there accessibility requirements for commercial software?
Illegal? You're kidding, right? Commercial software user interfaces are not regulated by law, no more than law requires a novel to be printed in large type.
You might be confusing with laws governing access to telephone services, or something like that.
Now, it might be that Adobe could sell better into certain markets (e.g., the Federal Government) by being able to say they conform to certain requirements for accessibility (e.g., section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973) on a response to a request for bid. That could make it commercially attractive to add those features.
But an illegal UI?
Maybe someday... Give the lawyers time.
Disclaimer: I am no lawyer; I've just done a little research.
Well, I, for one, only purchased CS5 when I was assured by the sales rep on the phone that I was going to be "very happy" with the improvements Adobe has made in terms of accessibility. I was told that they finally did conform to the Windows accessibility practices and that I would be able to use these programs as I do any other (including Paint Shop Pro, which I have been using for decades partly because the Adobe products were not accessible.
And to add insult to injury, I now have a project with a deadline, and Adobe says I have to pay for telephone support. But I see here that it's not just me that is having these issues.
I have now resorted to changing my screen res to 1280 x 960 and I can now (just) read everything on PS screen.
What a ridiculous situation though. I have not read any reviews that mention this lack of compatibility with Windows yet it is a very important point. And I don't know how to even start complaining to Adobe - any ideas?
I have written, called, and now I am about to really try to raise the roof
because I bought the whole CS5 Suite based on being told that it was
accessible. I have limited vision and I already have my windows fonts
tweaked and sized up. To have to change the screan resolution is not only a
PITA, as someone pointed out, it's a waste of an expensive monitor to use it
in something other than its native resolution. And I never use just PS--I
always have all sorts of applications open at once so changing the
resolution is not a resolution for me.
I'll have to look when I get home, but I don't think I've noticed this Problem at all! Win 7, 64 bit. Could it have something to do with the Video Card?
I have a brand new machine. What I am noticing is that the full version of
Acrobat 9 is accessible, at least when it is used through the browser. So
they have made some progress but unless there is something really well
hidden in PS, there is still no way to make it fully accessible. The menu
items are accessible but not the menus or the palettes or the dialogue
I am like the rest of you. I have 30 inch screens and have to roll my chair up to the screen to see it, I have tried large in settings, it didn't make a difference. Please if they are any fixes other than resetting screen please post.
Could one of you with the problem please photograph or capture your screen, and post the image here?
What's impossible to be sure of, from the text above, is whether some folks are seeing larger fonts than others, or whether the single somewhat fixed display setup is simply too small for some eyes.
Is this the same size as what you're seeing? Make sure you click on these images to see them full size:
One thing I can suggest, for those of you running Windows 7, is to run the ClearType Tuner. You can make choices that will make small characters seem darker and easier to read.
This is as large as I can get the text in windows 7 ultimate 64 bit.
Yup. Mine is just a tad larger because I have my type set at 125%.
I can get the menu items themselves to be larger by going to the display
settings, Advanced tab, but I cannot get the menu names or the diolog boxes
or palettes to be any larger.
It would help if you would also list your desktop size, in pixels as well as your physical monitor sizes.
From the one image posted just above, it looks as if you're seeing the same sizes and proportions of the Photoshop UI elements that the rest of us are, but with larger characters in the edit boxes.
I consider myself lucky because from where I sit everything's crisp and clear, and I don't crave larger UI elements. However, not everyone has good eyesight and the whole idea of accessibility is to make the UI accessible to more users.
My monitors are dell 30 inch.(3008wfp) The resolution is set at 2560x1600 which is recommended. All other software I am running is very easy to read. In photoshop all pictures are great, but trying to read the menus text etc is very difficult unless I move closer like 18 inches from the screen. I do not have bad eyesight. (this is the only program I am using that has this small text) I have the photoshop Suite, Encore is like it should be,The others like after effects, soundbooth, flash have large menu bars but all other text is very small.
If failing to meet accessibility standards is not illegal, it should be.
And I have a Dell Ultrasharp 24" with resolution 1920x1200 and custom text
sized at 182%.
My monitors are dell 30 inch.(3008wfp) The resolution is set at 2560x1600 which is recommended.
trying to read the menus text etc is very difficult unless I move closer like 18 inches from the screen. I do not have bad eyesight.
Nice sounding monitor setup, but I wonder if it's got problems. I have to differ with you a bit in your assessment...
The 3008 WFP has about 100 dpi pixel resolution, which is not different from what I see on my LCD monitors.
With 100 dpi monitors and good eyesight you should not be needing to increase the size of the UI elements nor moving closer to see them clearly - they are QUITE easy to see when they are sharply rendered. Either your monitors are not crisply displaying your pixels, or your eyesight is worse than you think - or both.
My normal viewing distance is about 28 to 30 inches (I can just touch my screen with an oustretched arm), and I have NO problems seeing the Photoshop UI elements at this size. In fact, I can easily see them out to 4 feet or more - until my glasses get beyond their usable limit.
I'm not criticising you here, not at all, but trying to provide some observations that could help you.
1. You need to critically check your monitor hardware setup. It's possible the UI elements are not being rendered as sharply on your system as they should be. With LCD monitors you should see every pixel sharply rendered at 100% size. Even tiny 1 pixel dots on the tops of lower case i characters should be crisply visible. Do not settle for less!
2. I suggest you have an eye exam. You can, if it turns out your eyes are a little weak, get your optometrist (e.g., Lenscrafters) to create a special pair of glasses specifically for computer use. Ask for Computer Glasses, and go in armed with your normal viewing distance. That's what I've done, and being able to see small detail on the computer is WAY better than not being able to see them. UI elements aside, your WORK will be better for it.
Hope this helps in the interim while Adobe (hopefully) works up a more accessible new version for the future.
little more information on my photoshop setup. I use photoshop a lot, my only complaint is in this version with my set up the UI is very small as seen in prev posted picture. I can live with the small print, but it would be nice to have larger print. I was hoping someone else had solved the small print problem and could advise me some trick to get it larger. I have already tried all the crisping largest text settings etc. Maybe in the next version it could be addressed. All the older versions before 4 worked great. I do set my monitors with spyder elite for exact color, and the monitors drop about 10 % brightness from factory set up. I set back about 36 inches from my screen, And for the last several years have my eyes checked yearly and have prescription glasses set for 36 inches. So I do not have a eye problem, usually I do not even need the glasses for most programs but even with the special glasses it is eye straining to see the little boxes and print, and as mention before all other aspects of photoshop works great. It would be nice to be able to use it like the encore interface. After I find the menu button the menu options are plenty large, it is just a little eye strain to see the little menu and tool boxes. I have a very large screen and wonder how someone with a smaller screen interacts. It would be great for adobe to have a fix for this sometime, I am very satisfied with the adobe products, it would just be nice not to have to strain.
I am sorry, Noel, but I really think your answer is over the top. I do, in
fact have limited vision, but even so, I am able to adjust EVERY other
program that I run so I can easily use it. Even if I had perfect vision,
which dhwant6 might have, the relative size of the menu and dialog fonts is
TINY and cannot be changed. I thought, when you were asking all those
questions, that perhaps you worked for Adobe, and were trying to get a
handle on what our environments were. But it appears that you were just
trying to let us know that we were the problem and not the software.
Perhaps I am overstepping in answering something you sent to someone else,
but I have never seen anyone on a board address a post the way you have.
It's not constructive or respectful at all. Obviously we are all
experienced, knowledgeable people or we would not be using this software or
these monitors. Please treat us with the respect that you would want to be
Did you read the same thing I wrote? I'm sorry that I have offended you.
I'm not saying you shouldn't want or have the ability to resize your UI elements. Far from it, I hope Adobe fixes this. I don't happen to believe it should be a law as John suggests, but I'm all for accessibility as long as it's made configurable. I like the direction Microsoft has taken with Windows 7, and Adobe is less well integrated with Windows 7 than many other packages.
I'm not an Adobe employee, though from their past policies I can say there's virtually no chance they will change Photoshop CS5 in a way that will satisfy those who wish to see larger UI elements. So I'm trying to suggest workarounds that might make the current software easier to use.
As I do design software user interfaces I'm very interested in perceptions that differ significantly from my own. I use multiple large monitors myself and I honestly haven't felt the need to increase the size of Photoshop's UI. If anything, I strive to minimize the UI elements and chrome so as to maximize workspace.
I have a VERY sharp set of displays myself, and I can only guess those of you who say Adobe's UI elements are hard to see aren't seeing them nearly as clearly as I am - that's only logical. Everyone's displays can and should work this well. Not everyone knows that, because they haven't seen what I see.
I would love to see what you see. I cannot imagine that getting a display
to show this teeny font crisper could mitigate the fact that it is, indeed,
teeny font. I am very glad that you have wonderful equipment and that you
have no problems with it. Some of us, on the other hand, seem to have very
good equipment and Windows7 cleartype, which is a big improvement over the
way XP scaled and displayed fonts, and yet we still find the font very teeny
and almost impossible to read.
And, yes, Adobe makes a very strong case for building Accessible web sites
and applications, but it does not follow that advice for itself in
Photoshop. I find that disturbing and has been one of the main reasons I
have stuck with Corel Paint Shop Pro for decades, and will continue to do
so. Corel costs much less that PS, and I can accomplish the same things
with it. It's not the "industry standard" but that does not make it an
inferior product and, in fact, I find it very capable and it has Always Been
Accessible. The lack of accessibility is not an industry standard either
Noel Carboni wrote:
It's not about you Noel, it's about people less well endowed than you who have problems with miniscule type.
My post is definitely about me trying to learn something, ultimately to make my own products better. I'd like to get something out of this forum too.
So... Do YOU (John) feel that the Photoshop UI elements are too small? Or do they work for you?
By the way the girl with the two 30 inch monitors has me beat by a country mile, mine are only 20 inches.
Noel Carboni wrote:
Yes they are definitely too small.
(Although I don't have a problem reading them myself. )
I have this same problem. I am using Windows 7 on a Dell Laptop... brand new equipment.
Everyplace else I go the fonts are size, I go into Photoshop CS5 and menu names, dialog boxes, palettes
, etc... the fonts are so tiny. Adobe knows about this problem and you can get something from them for this problem. I had CS4 and it did the same thing. They told me they never heard about this and I told them to check online to see how many people have this problem. That stopped them dead in their tracks and they sent me CS5 hoping the problem was fixed and to keep me satisfied as a customer. I had CS3 and I loved it. CS5 was no better. They need to fix this font problem. I can't find the number that I had called before but I will call the sales number at Adobe and will not get off the phone with them until they can give me a fix for this problem (which I don't think they have) or return my money to me. And if they don't I WILL be going to my local papers and to my local news channels to tell them about the problems that Adobe has with their software and that they are not giving their customers their money back. And to the idiot who thinks it's peoples eyes... all I can say is that you shouldn't even bother replying to posts if you only have something idiotic to say. We get on these posts to help us solve problems with our software not to hear stupid insults from people like you. Everyone with this problem should start dialing Adobe. Don't let large corporations take our money and give us merchandise that is defective. They will be hearing me loud and clear in just one moment.
Update: I spent over an hour on the phone with different departments within Adobe. I started off with Tech Support 1-800-642-3623, then to Customer Service 1-800-833-6687, then back to Tech Support for Photoshop and then finally back to Customer Service. To answer this problem....there is no fix for PC users if you have a half decent resolution on your screen. This is unacceptable. I am waiting to hear about getting a full refund. My request has gone to a higher power within and should hear today. All employees that I spoke with admitted knowing about this and saying there is no good fix to it. If you can not use your software because of this I would suggest calling them and complaining at least. If you can not use it like I can't since I am not going to lower my resolution on my screen for their fix. I bought a good monitor with high resolution and then paid big money for what I considered one of the best softwares a photographer can use and now it's not usable. Do not wait and do not take no for an answer if you want a refund for this software. If you are like me we need a software that can be used in a reasonable manner. One that we can atleast see on our screens.