not really sure what i meant by the testing. i know, pretty
nebulous.
must've been drinking.
here's what i'm wondering. with java, spring is gold. hundred
times better
than struts, and doesn't seem to be on a mission to make
everything super
complicated, which i always thought was the biggest problem
with struts.
over-java-izing it, if you follow me. Spring is much more
sensible.
but one of the things that Spring and other java frameworks
attempt to solve
is database handling, either b/c the "plumbing" of a java
database
connection is a pain in the butt, or because they want to
remove sql
entirely, via object-relational mapping, or whatever. i could
do without the
hibernate stuff, but Spring definitely makes db access almost
ColdFusion
easy (not quite, but almost). But with coldfusion, that's not
a problem
that needs to be solved. DB connectivity is braindead simple,
which I like.
My worry about some of these frameworks is that they make
easy stuff
complicated. some of the people on my team would latch on
instantly. but for
some, they'd have a really hard time. i mean, it's bad enough
when half of
your configuation is stored in the DB and you're used to just
searching in
code for what you need to fix. but to add onto that
parameters and such into
xml files, and that would seem to make things even more
complicated.
So...have you found that to be true at all? for a bunch of
guys who've been
doing straight old CF for 5 years, how would the framework
"fit", as it
were?
thanks matt. good talk.
"mpwoodward *ACE*" <mpwoodward@gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:e4kdi4$rsd$1@forums.macromedia.com...
> Marc E wrote:
>> anyone using coldspring? what's the concensus so far
on how stable it is,
>> how useful, etc? increasing productivity, lending
itself to better
>> testing of coldfusion apps, etc?
>>
>> anyone finding it's just not worth the learning
curve?
>>
>> all opinions most welcome.
>
> I'm using ColdSpring on several applications and
absolutely love it. Even
> though it's still pre-1.0 I've had no problems with
stability. I use it
> in conjunction with Mach-II. Here's some general
opinions on it from my
> blog:
>
http://mattwoodward.com/blog/index.cfm?commentID=212
>
http://mattwoodward.com/blog/index.cfm?commentID=215
>
> Regarding your comment about lending itself to better
testing of CF apps,
> ColdSpring isn't a testing framework. Not sure if that's
what you meant.
>
> Learning curve is actually pretty small--once you get
the hang of what it
> does, it just does its job and does it darn well.
>
> Matt
>
> --
> Matt Woodward
> mpwoodward@gmail.com
> Adobe Community Expert - ColdFusion