Johnny852 wrote:
> In my opinion when I select a column that is let's say
timestamp type - the
> object in a query is CF's date/time object. I've checked
the query by
> getMetaData() and it looks like each column has its own
database type (eq.
> varchar2, date, etc).
if you already know cf is returning a datetime from a
datetime in the db, what's
the question?
> My concern comes from a fact that I've heard that
Coldfusion is treating the
"fact"? unless the datetime is stored as a string, that's not
a "fact".
> Example:
> Locale of database EU: yyyy/mm/dd
> Locale of Coldfusion US: yyyy/dd/mm
btw neither of your example "locales" are in fact locales.
> The date like 1st of February 2007 stored in a database
would look then in
> Coldfusion like: 2nd of January 2007
if you pass a numeric string representation (2/1/2007 for
instance) of a date to
cf, it will be interpreted via the cf server's "default"
local (ie en_US,
month/day/year) unless you use one of the LS functions like
LSParseDateTime() &
specifically set the the locale (like setLocale("th_TH")) or
make the date
non-ambiguous (2-feb-2007) or build the date yourself from
user input using
createDate() or createDateTime(). you just need to convert
the user's string
representation to a valid cf datetime object (or i guess
force to database to
follow the user's locale date mask).