Copy link to clipboard
Copied
We push out latest versions of Flash Player to the enterprise using a patching management suite. Every time a flash patch goes out, it rolls over (and updates) our computers that have a need to run the Flash ESR branch. Is there a registry key or specific file in the file system that indicates that the Flash Player version installed is the ESR branch and not the latest branch?
Hi Maria,
Finally got around to doing this - the Bug ID is: 3853583
Thx,
Adam
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi Adam,
The way to identify if the version installed is ESR or not is by the major version number, which is '13' at this, whereas the current version is '14'.
The Flash Player files themselves have the version number in the file name. The files are located in \Windows\System32\Macromed\Flash and \Windows\SysWow64\Macromed\Flash (if you have 64-bit OS). On Mac, the version number is in the Flash Player.Plugin Info.plist file.
For registry entries, Flash Player creates the following entries with version number:
If on 64-bit OS, additional entries are created in the Wow64Node for the 32-bit player version (since both 32- and 64-bit versions of Flash Player are installed on 64-bit OS).
HTH.
--
Maria
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Unfortunately, my company is on a search and destroy mission for old versions of flash player. When they see "13" they assume it's old and then upgrade it. I was hoping for a regkey value to the effect of "Release=ESR", either in the Uninstall key (which is where my company looks for version info), or the above mentioned FlashPlayer keys. Can you put in an enhancement request to the development/packaging team for this?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi Adam,
I can certainly file the request for you, however, if you file it yourself (at https://bugbase.adobe.com) you can keep track of the progress and provide comments to the team. If you file the bug, post the bug number here and I'll go ahead and process it to the triage folks for consideration.
--
Maria
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi Maria,
Finally got around to doing this - the Bug ID is: 3853583
Thx,
Adam