• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Adobe stock contribution

New Here ,
Dec 08, 2016 Dec 08, 2016

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I understand that when submitting stock if it is a recognizable monument or building a release is needed.  I have several pictures from Yellowstone National Park and Grand Teton National park of scenery and animals and am wondering would these types of photos also require a release?

TOPICS
Contributors

Views

411

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Adobe Employee , Dec 08, 2016 Dec 08, 2016

It will depend on the image and what is in it. You can review our known image restrictions which includes some national parks at this link: Known image restrictions

With the animals be sure to avoid using the keyword "Zoo" as that will imply the animal is private property and would require a release.

-Mat

Votes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Employee ,
Dec 08, 2016 Dec 08, 2016

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

It will depend on the image and what is in it. You can review our known image restrictions which includes some national parks at this link: Known image restrictions

With the animals be sure to avoid using the keyword "Zoo" as that will imply the animal is private property and would require a release.

-Mat

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 22, 2017 Feb 22, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I have submitted some photos of animals in a zoo, with the word "zoo" among the keywords in all of them, but some of them were accepted, other ones were rejected for intellectual violation. Why this different opinion?

Thank you

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Employee ,
Feb 22, 2017 Feb 22, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

If the image appears to have been taken at a zoo and you have used the keyword zoo, it should have been rejected unless you have provided a property release signed by the zoo.

-Mat

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 22, 2017 Feb 22, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

As I wrote above, images almost identical had a different judgment. For all these images the word "zoo" was present and all the images appeared to have been taken at a zoo, but some of them were rejected and some were accepted. In my opinion the reason is that the ispector that examined the photos was different. Do you agree?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines