Spatial/Lossless

[Xeptor]

The complete folder with all images get this message.

"Could not complete your request because reading Spatial/Lossless JPEG files in not implemented."

These photos are important to other people therefore important to me also hopefully not gone forever. Does anyone have a solution?

[c.pfaffenbichler]

Can you open the images in another application like Preview?

With which application exactly were the images created?

[Xeptor]

They were created/edited using Photoshop in 2008 then stored in a folder on the hard drive. Last opened 18 months ago. Have copied the photos to another drive to view on another computer. Same problem. Not more I can add to this.

[c.pfaffenbichler]

Can you open the images in another application like Preview?

[Xeptor]

Unable to preview in Bridge or any windows browser/applications.

Frustrating.

[c.pfaffenbichler]

CC should still allow you to install Photoshop CS6.

In 2008 you should only have had CS4 or lower, but it might still be worth trying.

If that does not work could you post an image for testing on this Forum?

I myself do not have CS4 installed anymore but maybe someone else who has can try.

Though there still might be a chance that the images are actually corrupted …

[Xeptor]

I tried to upload one of the photos & being 24MB wont allow the upload to happen.

[Greg29701045nrbq]

Came across the same thing on images sent to me to use for work. On a Mac, I found out that if you open the jpeg file Preview, you can save it out as a jpeg. This will rewrite the jpeg so that it is readable with PSD. Also did the same with an image conversion app, Pym. I would save out the files either way, at the highest quality. Hope this helps.

[jane-e]

Hope this helps.

By @Greg29701045nrbq

Hi Greg,

You answered a thread from six years ago and the OP has not been online for four years. MacOS Preview was mentioned twice already. Thanks anyway.

Jane

[Nick36230869on9g]

"You answered a thread from six years ago" - this is partly Google's fault. If you search for certain things, it serves up ancient results from time to time - old articles, and also forum posts like this one. It's not really this person's fault who replied to you for not checking every date on every post on every link they click on the internet. Enjoy your re-re-necro'd thread, or whatever you call it when people commit such awful sins.

[Ged_Traynor]

@Nick36230869on9g maybe you should have checked the dates before posting, @jane-e replied to a post from May 2023

[Nick36230869on9g]

Woosh