• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

AE / Prem Rendering Vector Files Blurry & Pixelated

New Here ,
May 10, 2017 May 10, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I've never had this issue in 5 years and I'm perplexed.

So I edited a simple animation in After Effects using an EPS vector file. In After Effects, it looks perfect. "Continuously Rasterize" is on. I exported it to "Lossless with Alpha" which still looks 100% smooth, exactly like AE. Then I put it at the end of my video in Premiere and export to H.264 > YouTube 1080 preset and just the logo portion of the animation becomes blurry. Not the text. Here are two samples. The top one is a screenshot from Premiere looking super crisp. The second screenshot is after exporting to H.264 > YouTube 1080 preset. As you can see in the 2nd image, the Sonic logo is blurred slightly while the text and Instagram logo remain super crisp.

Here are two samples. The top one is a screenshot from Premiere looking super crisp. The second screenshot is after exporting to H.264 > YouTube 1080 preset. As you can see in the 2nd image, the Sonic logo is blurred slightly while the text and Instagram logo remain super crisp.

Screen Shot 2017-05-10 at 1.57.07 PM.png

Screen Shot 2017-05-10 at 1.58.55 PM.png

Things I've tried:

  • Verified the EPS was a vector and changed it to an Ai file to animate in AE... Same result.
  • Exported the EPS vector as a large PNG to animate in AE... Same result.
  • Export a lossless version and use Adobe Media Encoder to render... Same result
  • Updated Adobe to the most recent everything... Same Result.
  • Sent AE file to a friend on another computer to render... Same result.
  • Removed all effects from the Vector layer in AE... Same result.

I know the difference isn't that noticeable but it's driving me bonkers.

Views

2.0K

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

LEGEND , May 10, 2017 May 10, 2017

It's the red in the logo combined with the black background.

H.264 does a crummy job with reds anyways, but it only gets worse at an edge with a sharply-defined edge and high contrast.... and you have both of those conditions.

But all things considered, it doesn't look too bad.  It's just not razor-sharp.

Votes

Translate

Translate
LEGEND ,
May 10, 2017 May 10, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

It's the red in the logo combined with the black background.

H.264 does a crummy job with reds anyways, but it only gets worse at an edge with a sharply-defined edge and high contrast.... and you have both of those conditions.

But all things considered, it doesn't look too bad.  It's just not razor-sharp.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
May 10, 2017 May 10, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

What Dave said. Bright reds are the worst kind of color for any MPEG-based compression and slumping it on a black background simply causes an extreme pedestal in contrast, bringing the algorithms to their limits. You can see that on your color scopes (if you care to use some). Unless you change the design, this won't improve further.

Mylenium

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines