Copy link to clipboard
Copied
hiii guysss..
i am facing a problem while applying graphics style.. that is when i selected multiple object(rectangle) and i apply graphics style, then its turn all rectangle with same image..( pls check the images.. first one is before applying graphics Style ) actually i need to apply same graphics style to all those rectangle. how to do that..
Your "images" aren't placed images. You are using images as a fill of a rectangle. A fill is an attribute of a container and therefore is is – like every attribute (stroke, background colour, corner radius, opacity, …) – taken over into a graphic style.
If you place images, a graphic style doesn't adopt the image, because in this case it is not an attribute, but a content.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I tried the same and also failed.
But, what do you need a graphic style for? If you select all pictures you can set all settings you need
size of the frames, etcetera, at once for all frames and that´s it.
Does this help?
Best Regards,
Uwe
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Your "images" aren't placed images. You are using images as a fill of a rectangle. A fill is an attribute of a container and therefore is is – like every attribute (stroke, background colour, corner radius, opacity, …) – taken over into a graphic style.
If you place images, a graphic style doesn't adopt the image, because in this case it is not an attribute, but a content.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
its right.. when I place image its working perfectly..
but my doubt .. when I place an image and also fill a rectangle fill(F), 'the Current selection type' will be same (showing as Image Frame) why its like that ?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yes (and no):
A fill has nothing to do with the object type. You can fill image containers, rectangles, buttons, text frames, composition targets, composition triggers, menu backgrounds, and …, and …, and …)
Placed images need (or already have) an image container. This is the „crossed out“ rectangle tool in the toolbar.
You may nevertheless fill an image container with a background image, which will be visible, if no image is placed into it.
You can create a „normal“ rectangle, which can be filled with an image. But you can’t place an image into such a rectangle. (Filled) Rectangles can be scaled unproportionally, image frames can’t – or better: only, if they (a) don’t contain a placed image or (b) only contain a fill image.
The disadvantages of filling a frame with image:
The advantage of filling a frame with an image:
Sounds complicated? Just try it and ask, if there are further questions.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
thanks dearrrr