Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello,
I hope a few folks can offer some guidance on Lightroom cc editing speed, and to a lesser extent Photoshop editing speed, on a new desktop PC that I had built for photo editing. See specs below.
I had been using a four year old mid-range laptop to do the photo editing and was tired of waiting for previews to load, brush strokes, spot healing and other tasks to process, and generally lethargic photo editing. Regarding Lightroom, which is my primary editing software, I know that in theory at least, the first local edit (brush stroke, spot, etc) is faster than the hundredth or thousandth; that there is a cumulative hardware resource burden. But, I notice this from the start of a new import and new file.
I am quite disappointed that the new machine is rather comparable in photo editing speed and I don’t know how to pinpoint the problem.
My primary frustration has to do with editing in Lightroom, in the develop module. Sure, I’d like the importing to be lightning fast – it isn’t – but I have my coffee then. Also, I don't use Photoshop very often.
Using Windows Resource Monitor and Task Manager my CPU never has gone above 35% and usually is in the single digits, and the Ram is almost always at about 15% utilization.
I ran GPU-z and it shows the GPU load to be single digit and all other graphic displays on it are very low.
I installed all software on the M.2 drive, placed all actively edited photos on the Samsung 850 EVO SSD. I’ve set LR & PS cache and ‘scratch disks’ to the SSD.
The M.2 is only about 30% used, the 850 EVO is about 60% used (but I had the same lackluster performance when it was only 30% full).
What has been puzzling (besides the slow processing speed):
I have tested the read/write speeds between disks by moving about 100 gigs of photos from drive to drive:
One of the reasons I wanted to upgrade the hardware was to better match the camera: I primarily use a Nikon D810 and file sizes average about 75,000 MB.
The shop that built the machine says only that I can send it back and they’ll have a look. The downside there is that’s 1000 miles away and I’m not so impressed with their service to date. I’ve trouble shot some of their assembly issues myself after they couldn’t provide useful assistance.
I’ve also checked the hardware, and unless some of it is counterfeit, it all seems to be as ordered.
Any and all suggestions on how to research this issue more thoroughly would be greatly appreciated.
Dan
Desktop specs:
Intel® Core™ Processor i7-7700K 4.20GHZ 8MB Intel Smart Cache LGA1151 (Kaby Lake)
ASRock Z270 Extreme4 ATX w/ USB 3.1, 2 PCIe x16, 3 PCIe x1, 6 SATA3, 2 M.2 SATA/PCIe
40GB DDR4/2400MHz Dual Channel Memory GSKILL Ripjaws V
EVGA GeForce® GTX 1050 Ti Superclocked Gaming 4GB GDDR5 (Pascal) (Single Card)
650 Watts - Corsair CX650M CX Series Modular 80 PLUS BRONZE Modular Power Supply
M.2 SSD: 256GB Plextor M8Pe Series PCIe NVMe M.2 SSD - 2000MB/s Read & 900MB/s Write
500GB Samsung 850 EVO Series SATA-III 6.0Gb/s SSD - 540MB/s Read & 520MB/s Write
2TB SATA-III 6.0Gb/s 64MB Cache 7200RPM HDD
Windows 10 Home (64-bit Edition)
Using two 1920x1200 monitors, both plugged into the 1050 video card
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Turn off the GPU acceleration. It won't help with a monitor that is 1920x1080. (Preferences->Performance->uncheck "Use Graphics Processor")
The only experiment I can think of to try is to disconnect one monitor and see if the problem improves.
I’ve always felt that my LR Catalog folder was too big. Even if I don’t include the backups the folder is 32 Gigs. My impression is that the previews never get deleted even though I have them set to be saved for only 30 days. I’m not sure how to safely do anything about that or if it is even advisable.
There's no such thing as a catalog that is too big, or a catalog folder that is too big; and even if there was such a thing, it would have no impact on editing speed.
As long as I’ve had this machine, about three weeks now, the highest write speed I’ve seen when editing is about 100 mb/sec. As already mentioned, I can’t find any ‘bottle neck’ that should explain the slow speed.
Unless you are exporting, Lightroom doesn't write a lot of information to the disk, and so it's unlikely you'd need faster write speeds.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The following won't solve your problem, but it may be of interest:
FYI... Tom Hogarty is in charge of LR at Adobe.
John
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I have a problem too, where Lr is so slow, even though being freshly installed and never used, that even opening and collapsing panels lag. While I'm running Lr, my whole machine works really slow. CPU loads aren't climbing, memory usage is very manageable (I have 12gb and no other heavy apps running, browser closed). When I quit Lr, everything goes back normal again.
Disabling GPU acceleration or other gimmicks do nothing.
At it's current state, Lr is unusable for me. And I did get CC mainly for photo and video work.