• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Why were these puctures rejected?

Community Beginner ,
Sep 04, 2017 Sep 04, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Good morning all together,

I have two images uploaded which were declined due to technical reasons.

I could understand the description of technical reasons for different kinds of pictures, but not for these illustrations.

All colour settings were selected to receice this interesting look.

Please have a look and share your opinion.

IMG_4472.JPG

And without the raves.

IMG_4468.JPG

Many thanks

Ben

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

907

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Explorer , Sep 05, 2017 Sep 05, 2017

Could be the artefacts in the image. But in that case they normally give you this as a reason. The second reason could be that they don`t see a market for this image (art).

Votes

Translate

Translate
Explorer ,
Sep 05, 2017 Sep 05, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Could be the artefacts in the image. But in that case they normally give you this as a reason. The second reason could be that they don`t see a market for this image (art).

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Sep 05, 2017 Sep 05, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

OK, I could follow if they decide to say that there would be no market. This might be understandable.

But the reason was clearly technical reasons, which is linked to wight balance or colour settings.

it makes no sense for me for this kind of pictures.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Contributor ,
Sep 06, 2017 Sep 06, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

A: Low commercial value.  The "background" is odd, and the subject is unlear.
2: You didn't submit it with your watermark in the lower left, did you?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Sep 06, 2017 Sep 06, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Good morning,

1. OK, if you are right, they can tell it to me. And they accepted the pure background. No commercial value is OK and understandable, but not with the reason for rejection as technical issues.

2. No, of course not. I used the smartphone for the post. I just have the internet version on it  , and they are watermarked.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines