Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Ryzen R5 1600X, smt disable
Asrock B350 Pro4
8gb dd4 2400 mhz
7200rpm wd10ezex hdd
GTX 1060 3gb
I have a problem. Looks like a render and the export is very very slow...
Cuda and mercury on.
PPBM Result "1141","127","25","-554",
Guess what? Your system has the absolute minimum amount of RAM that's required just to even run Premiere Pro CC 2017 at all. That, combined with the fact that your system appears to have only a single disk (and a spinning hard disk, at that) that's shared by absolutely everything including the OS, programs, projects and media, really skewed your results, especially the CPU-only MPEG-2 DVD MPE Off score and the Disk I/O score - both of which are substantially longer than they should have been.
As
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Guess what? Your system has the absolute minimum amount of RAM that's required just to even run Premiere Pro CC 2017 at all. That, combined with the fact that your system appears to have only a single disk (and a spinning hard disk, at that) that's shared by absolutely everything including the OS, programs, projects and media, really skewed your results, especially the CPU-only MPEG-2 DVD MPE Off score and the Disk I/O score - both of which are substantially longer than they should have been.
As a result, your system really needs more RAM and at least one more disk in order to function anywhere near what it's supposed to.
Randall
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you Randall!
First time I will try +1 HDD(I have another at home). Later I'll buy a SSD and minimum +8gb memory.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
PPBM results "PPBM Result "1141","127","25","-554","
but if it does not show that tells me you are using and old version of PPBM. Here is my current version URL BillG Video Editing Blog
Good luck on your retest
Bill
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Actually, that 127-second H.264 Blu-ray score is slower than the 100-second result that I achieved with my older (current) main quad-core Intel i7-4790K that has been running at its "stock" (actually, default Turbo'd) speed. (And my system is running the Fall Creators Update version of Windows 10, with all of its 170 background processes running, to boot.) The GTX 1060 in the OP's system has only 3GB of VRAM and only 1152 CUDA cores while the GTX 1060 in mine has 6GB of VRAM and 1280 CUDA cores - and that difference accounts for part of that deficiency. The deficiency in both the RAM amount and the CUDA core count put together really hurt the H.264 Blu-ray score but didn't affect the MPEG-2 DVD score much.
And even so, if that "-554" result is really 554 seconds, that puts the OP's system below the 520-second result from my system.