This content has been marked as final. Show 4 replies
Just curious as to why you need to randomly generate the unused letters? Are
you going to be generating multiple puzzles based on the same set of words?
Sorry I can't offer a solution, but I would think that checking a huge list
of words they way you currently are would take exponentially more time than
it does with a relatively small list of swear words.
> Just curious as to why you need to randomly generate the unused letters?
> you going to be generating multiple puzzles based on the same set of
Yeah, there's a large pool of words to choose from. (180 total) The
program takes 30 of them and arranges them on a 20x15 grid. That part
already works. Problem is what to do with the remaining letters. I also
have a system where I can forbid certain letters. For example, one word on
the list is "Jellyfish". Now, all it takes is an "IT" randomly appearing at
the end of that to make a swear word. So what I do is have the word listed
in all-caps, as "JELLYFISH", with a lower case "it" after it, guaranteeing
that the two letters that appear after the end of the word will be anything
but 'I' and 'T'. Again, that already works. But I've had complaints from
people (really just one person so far, but he claims it will annoy other
people, so I'm doing this to appease his fears) that some other words
appear, which may not be swears like the above example, but are still words,
and not being able to select them is a frustrating distraction. In almost
every case, the words that are accidentally generated involve no more than 2
unused letters. "JELLYFISH" could just as easily have a "op" at the end of
it. Now I don't think it's really that much of a problem, but if there's
easy way to scan through and make sure that doesn't happen, I'd like to try.
Again, it only matters with horizontals, because the eye isn't drawn to
vertical and diagonal words the same way.
> Sorry I can't offer a solution, but I would think that checking a huge
> of words they way you currently are would take exponentially more time
> it does with a relatively small list of swear words.
That's what I'm thinking, and the other solution is to just NOT have the
puzzles be random at all, but I put so much work into my beautiful random
puzzle generator, it would be an awful shame to get rid of it...
Don't get caught up in one person's opinion. While it may seem reasonable at first, let me assure you it is not. Here are the reasons why:
1. Over the years I've done many word search puzzles and I've found countless words in them which are not part of the list. You cannot avoid that. Heck, 'a' is a word by strict definition.
2. Check other word searches online or in books, newspapers, etc. and if you look hard enough you'll find words not in the list.
3. What you may not realize is a word may, in actual fact, be a word. I also play Scrabble so my vocabulary may be better than someone elses'.
4. There are english word lists on the net which contain approx. 125,000 words. Imagine trying to iterate through your 20x15 grid trying to match groups of letters to a word list of 125,000 just to make sure you don't have any other possible words in your grid that are not in your word list?.... that would be prohibitively slow.
5. If your list is not being used or is ignored then make it more prominent... how do you find words in a word search otherwise?... that's sort of the whole point of a word search, I've always thought.. "Let's see, what words am I going to search for in this word search?... ah, there we go; the word list....well, the first word is 'pizza'... hmmmm..."
In short, I think this person who's opinion you are concerned with needs to be educated. He obviously has a different opinion about word searches which hasn't been well thought out. The worst thing you can do is try to accomodate those poorly formed opinions. Educate.
I pretty much agree with you on all points. Only thing I'm concerned about
> 5. If your list is not being used or is ignored then make it more
> how do you find words in a word search otherwise?... that's sort of the
> point of a word search, I've always thought.. "Let's see, what words am I
> to search for in this word search?... ah, there we go; the word
> the first word is 'pizza'... hmmmm..."
Problem is, this program is made to run on a touch-screen kiosk, so I need
to devote as much space to the actual playing field as possible to account
for the innaccuracy that naturally results from using a touch-screen. If I
broke off a chunk in order to make the word-list visible all the time, it
would make the letters too small to be easily manipulable by finger.
However, there is a prominant button right in the middle at the bottom of
the screen marked "WORD LIST". If somebody chooses to ignore that, it's
their perogative. Failing that, there's a "HINT" button which will randomly
highlight the first or last letter of one of the words you haven't found.
One partial fix that has helped a little bit is that I made it so that all
of the randomly placed letters which are not part of words are consonants,
not vowels. So words can only be formed where they cross over vowels in
other words. Other than getting rid of the random factor altogether, I
can't think of anything else I can reasonably do.