4 Replies Latest reply on Mar 21, 2013 1:26 PM by Yammer

    Performance

    frogmike Level 1

      I'm running adobe CS6 Cloud suite, with an i7 cpu, 16GB Ram, decent GPU, etc... I'm not sure if I'm just expecting too much or whatever, but my D800 RAW files seem to take a bit long to process/edit in Camera Raw. Its especially noticeable when applying spot removal (waiting for the effec to take place, then have the lag when moving the spot around), and also when I'm running scripts through photoshop. About 7-8 seconds per photo it takes to process. Does that sound fair? Is there a way to adjust my performance better? I'm already letting photoshop use 11GB of RAM, I'm just wondering if there's anything else I can do to boost my performance.

       

      Thanks.

        • 1. Re: Performance
          Yammer Level 4

          I have found that noise reduction and lens correction are the biggest slow-downs. Try an image without using these, and tell us if it's just as slow.

          • 2. Re: Performance
            Noel Carboni Level 7

            It is a VERY compute-intensive process, and to be fair the D800 has quite a large number of pixels.

             

            That said, Adobe seems to be struggling a bit to get all your processor cores working as efficiently as possible in tandem on the task.  It's no small feat to get multi-threading just right.  Beyond that, I don't think they're using GPU acceleration in the process yet.

             

            You might want to have a glance at these threads re: Camera Raw performance:

             

            http://forums.adobe.com/message/4835211  (post 7 discusses D800 conversions specifically)

             

            http://forums.adobe.com/message/4487046

             

            http://forums.adobe.com/message/4426058

             

            It's important to determine whether you have a specific problem or are just seeing the more or less typical computing overhead.  If you have a specific image with specific settings and would like to put the .NEF/.XMP combination online - or just describe in detail what you're doing and precisely how long it takes others could relate their experiences.

             

            -Noel

            • 3. Re: Performance
              frogmike Level 1

              Thanks for the replies. I'm fairly certain its jus the computing overhead that's the problem, slowish for every file I work on. It always seems like its having trouble loading the file, taking so long.

              I took a look at the threads and yeah I'm in the boat as the first guy.

              I guess there isn't any other way of boosting performance options, maybe I'll pray that Adobe gets an update out there, cause right now, its pretty brutal in certain spots when editing.

              Thanks!

               

              Mike

              • 4. Re: Performance
                Yammer Level 4

                That first discussion link is reported missing now. I'm losing track of all these discussions about poor Camera Raw and Bridge performance.

                 

                I'm back after radio silence, having replaced my PC mainboard and reinstalling all of my software. I'm now running an overclocked i7-3770K with 16GB RAM and processing raw D800 files. It certainly feels very snappy. I'm ready to do some more benchmarks.