2 Replies Latest reply on Mar 7, 2013 1:52 PM by mcallit82

    Insert Carriage Return/Line Feed in Glossary Definition

    mcallit82 Level 1

      I'm not sure if this is possible in Robohelp 10 or not, but I really have a need to insert a carriage return/line feed in a definition. For example, the definition could be like the following:


      1. Initial definition as used in one part of the application.

      2. Second definition as used in another part of the application.


      I don't want to run the two lines together as it makes it more difficult to read (especially since we can't specifically format the text of the definition).


      I tried inserting 
 in the definition, but when the project is output as Webhelp, it is converting those characters to non-breaking spaces ( ). I figured that would work since the GLO file is XML, and XML 1.0 supports the use of those ASCII characters. However, it seems that Robohelp doesn't. When I added those ASCII characters to the glossary file, Robohelp changed them to 
. When I directly change the characters to 
 in the XML and save it, then return to Robohelp, the glossary is completely gone since, apparently, Robohelp can't read those character.


      Does anyone have a work around for this? Or is there another way to insert the line breaks?

        • 1. Re: Insert Carriage Return/Line Feed in Glossary Definition
          Willam van Weelden Adobe Community Professional & MVP



          As far as I know, RoboHelp will just remove line breaks.


          To get what you need, I can only think of these options:

          - Add two terms to the glossary, each which indicates the definition applying to the term in that specific context.

          - Add an HTML file with your glossary to the project





          • 2. Re: Insert Carriage Return/Line Feed in Glossary Definition
            mcallit82 Level 1

            I figured that would be the case. I played around with all sorts of possibilities, but it just doesn't stick.


            Although I don't want to include a glossary as a specific topic in the output, I may have to. It is just convenient to have a glossary to the side that can be viewed while not leaving the specific topic.


            I have been experimenting with CSS pop-ups for glossary terms by making each glossary term a variable with the necessary calls to the CSS included within the variable value. That seems to have possiblities, but it could become a little over the top, I'm afraid.